Thank you doug for you answer.
So now I have two other question.
1- how can I check the inter hemisphere registration quality? e.g. can I
check if the parcellation for the two hemisphere are matched well? or there
is other ways?
2- how can I correct for multiple correction for single subject? cal
We are pleased to offer a 2-year post-doctoral position at the Reina Sofia
Foundation Alzheimer's Disease Centre in Madrid, Spain.
The successful applicant will be involved in neuroimaging analyses of a
5-year longitudinal study (currently in year 4) of 1200 healthy elderly
individuals (aged 70-85
Thank you for your prompt reply.
2016-02-18 18:58 GMT+01:00 Douglas N Greve :
> You should not be using 5.2. Use 5.3 instead, that will have fsaverage_sym
>
> On 02/18/2016 12:06 PM, Ilaria Mazzonetto wrote:
> > Hi Freesurfer experts,
> > I'm using freesurfer v5.2.0.
> > If I use surfreg --s $sub
Hi,
We would like to process 1.5 T GE dicom scans for over 200 individuals. It
is unclear how to import these into FreeSurfer and process in batch.
Each subject folder consists of several subfolders. Each subfolder
consists of all the images of a single pulse sequence, e.g. sagittal spgr,
axia
Hi Marta
A 2D surface (like the cortical white or pial models) has two principal
curvatures at each point - one in the direction of maximum curvature and
one in the direction of minimum curvature - typically denoted k1 and k2.
The mean curvature is the average of these H=(k1+k2)/2 and the Gaus
Hi Angel
the time1/time2 correlation of eTIV is pretty worrisome. Are you sure
that there aren't outliers/failures in that set?
Bruce
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, angela.fav...@unipd.it wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
> I have a question about eTIV (FS 5.3) which I use as a covariate where
> approp
Hi Corinna
can you send us your full command line? Sounds like you are using a
surface overlay as the cover_seg parameter instead of a volume one. Try
running mri_info on it to make sure it is a volume (i.e. 256x256x256). If
not, you will need to sample it into the volume with mri_surf2vol
tha
this was :
Van Essen, D.C., Drury, H.A., 1997. Structural and functional analyses of human
cerebral cortex using a surface-based atlas. J Neurosci 17, 7079–102.
Cheers
—
Christophe Destrieux,
Unité « Imagerie et Cerveau » UMRS INSERM U930, Université François Rabelais de
Tours
Service de Ne
Hi Peter
can you send us the command line you used and the entire screen output
and recon-all.log file? Otherwise it's not possible for us to help you.
cheers
Bruce
On
Sat, 20 Feb 2016, pda...@westol.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We would like to process 1.5 T GE dicom scans for over 200 individuals.
thanks Christophe
Bruce
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016, Christophe Destrieux wrote:
this was :
Van Essen, D.C., Drury, H.A., 1997. Structural and functional analyses of
human cerebral cortex using a surface-based atlas. J Neurosci 17, 7079–102.
Cheers
—
Christophe Destrieux,
Unité « Imagerie et Cervea
Hi again,
While our "building from source" discussion is "hot" I wondered to ask
if there was an attempt or may be plans for to switch to using dynamic
linking (and collect functionality within a few internal
libraries) instead of static duplication of binary code across
binaries.
At some point M
hmmm, the only thing that worries me about dynamic linking is that it
will add variability to the outputs. Zeke has spent endless amounts of time
tracking down e.g. mac vs. pc differences in math libs and such. Won't
dynamic linking just make that a much more prevalent problem?
Bruce
On Sat,
I'm sorry but I do not understand my error.
Stefano
>Messaggio originale
>Da: Douglas N Greve
>Data: 19-feb-2016 18.05
>A:
>Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] R: Re: R: FS-FAST using MRS voxel or .label as seed
>
>Yes, that is expected given your command line.
>
>On 02/18/2016 06:52 PM, std...@virgi
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> hmmm, the only thing that worries me about dynamic linking is that it
> will add variability to the outputs. Zeke has spent endless amounts of time
> tracking down e.g. mac vs. pc differences in math libs and such. Won't
> dynamic linking just make th
On 20 February 2016 at 17:28, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> hmmm, the only thing that worries me about dynamic linking is that it
> will add variability to the outputs. Zeke has spent endless amounts of time
> tracking down e.g. mac vs. pc differences in math libs and such.
What sort of differences were
15 matches
Mail list logo
