Hi Bruce,
I will. Thanks!
Best, Silas
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 13:20:30 -0400
From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FW: FW: Functional group analysis
Hi Silas
Doug (who normally answers this kind of question) is on vacation. Can you
repost
Sorry, I didn't have access to my CentOS machine, the 32-bit libraries use the
suffix i686 instead of i386, so try
sudo yum remove libXp.i686
By removing the 32-bit version you essential ensure only the 64-bit version is
available when the application tries to load libXp. Hope that works. My
Hi Freesurfer Experts!
I'm looking to find the 2D co-ordinates for a vertex in the fsaverage
surface
I can find their 3D volume co-ordinates using read_surf but I'd like the 2D
coordinates.
I'll explain:
I would like to study properties of the inflated STS.
For each of the vertices I can find the 3
Hi Jonathan
sure. The sphere.reg acts as a lookup table for this. For the vertex you
want, just compute it's spherical coordinates from the sphere.reg file and
you should be all set.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, jonathan oron wrote:
Hi Freesurfer Experts!I'm looking to find the 2D co-
Dear freesurfer experts,
I'm performing a study about the variability of the execution time of
recon-all. I noticed that the execution of recon-all in Freesurfer 5.3 for
two identical MRIs (two copies of the same MRI), takes different execution
time.
I'm performing the execution using GPUs capabi
Hi,I keep getting an error when I run recon-all and can’t figure out what is wrong. I would really appreciate your help. I’ve attached the log file.Thank you so much,Emad
Emad Ahmadi, MD---Research FellowDepartment of RadiologyMassachusetts General Hospit
Not the fastest approach, but for each vertex, you could find the neighbors
and then test if the vertex is the maximum. There are matlab functions for
getting the list of neighboring vertices.
Best Regards, Donald McLaren
=
D.G. McLaren, Ph.D.
Research Fellow, Department of Neurolo
Hi Clara
are you sure you put the control points in the interior of the WM? If you
want to upload the subject we will take a look
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Clara
Kühn wrote:
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I've had this problem now a couple of times: after setting a few (in this case
2)
Dear FS experts
I extracted the vertex indices of several subjects. But unfortunately I did not
extract the corresponding Vertex RAS values. Is there a command to translate
the Vertex Index into a Vertex RAS so that I do not have to scroll through all
the subjects again?
I would like to script
Hi Christopher
mris_info --v
will print out the surface RAS coords of the vertex (plus some other
stuff that you probably don't care about)
Bruce
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Milde,
Christopher wrote:
Dear FS experts
I extracted the vertex indices of several subjects. But unfortunately I
How have your processed the fMRI data? If you have beta maps in the
native functional space, then you'll need to run bbregister on a
template from the native space, then run mri_vol2surf, the mri_concat,
then mri_glmfit
doug
On 6/28/15 1:17 PM, Silas wrote:
Dear all,
Can anyone help me with
Hi all,
We are currently using SMS3 scans for our resting state data. In order to
preprocess this scan, we are using the preproc-sess command which includes
slice-time correction. Since SMS3 is a multi-slice sequence that is
interleaved, do we need to use a different slice-time correction speci
Hi Stefano, sorry for the delay, I was traveling. It sounds like you
just need to run fcseed-config and specify -seg ROI_MASK.mgz and -segid
1 (assuming your ROI_MASK is in $SUBJECTS_DIR/subject/mri). If the mask
is in the orig.mgz space, then everything should work ok, but you can
look at it w
Hi David, did you resolve this?
doug
On 06/12/2015 04:56 PM, David C. Zhu wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thanks.
>
> I can see that the “mris_preproc” command reads the header information
> in “register.dat”.
>
> I set the “.” as the $SUBJECTS_DIR, and thus it seems that
> “mris_preproc” cannot locate
you can do something like this
mri_vol2surf --mov func.nii.gz --hemi lh --reg register.dat --projfrac
0.5 --o func.lh.mgh
tksurfer subject lh inflated -t func.lh.mgh
doug
On 06/13/2015 03:27 AM, jonathan oron wrote:
> Hi,
> In tksurfer I would like to be able to see the timecourse (Percent
>
Hi try starting out on this web page
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsFastIndividualRetinotopyAnalysis
On 06/16/2015 02:04 PM, lucas hosse wrote:
>
> Hi FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I have to construct the retinotopic mapping of angle and eccentricity.
>
> I have created with FreeSurfer the
I don't have a way to do SMS stc in 5.3 (it is there for 6.0). You might
not need it for 1.15s TR. How long are your stimuli?
On 06/29/2015 04:41 PM, Rodriguez-Thompson, Anais wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are currently using SMS3 scans for our resting state data. In order to
> preprocess this scan, w
I'm not sure what you mean. Why not use isxconcat-sess? Is your data
already on the surface in fsfast?
On 06/19/2015 08:26 AM, Silas wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer team,
>
> I'm currently doing a functional group analysis using FreeSurfer by
> following your tutorial:
> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard
You can probably use the csdbase.y.ocn.dat file. Run mri_glmfit-sim
--help to get more info
On 06/19/2015 10:18 AM, Andrew Schoen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have run some analyses using the GLM and cluster wise correction for
> multiple comparisons outlined here:
> http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/FsTutori
What version of mni152reg are you using?
On 06/22/2015 05:17 AM, OKADA NAOHIRO wrote:
> Hello Freesurfer Experts,
>
> I am trying to create a registration matrix from subject space to MNI152:
>
> mni152reg --s bert
>
> However, this error appeared:
>
> fslregister --mov
> /usr/local/fsl/data/stan
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your reply. It's for our resting scan, so we don't have any stimuli
present.
Best,
Anais
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 6:46 PM, Douglas N Greve
> wrote:
>
> I don't have a way to do SMS stc in 5.3 (it is there for 6.0). You might
> not need it for 1.15s T
oh, then I certainly would not worry about it. FC is really slow, so STC
won't make much of a difference
On 06/29/2015 07:01 PM, Rodriguez-Thompson, Anais wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thanks for your reply. It's for our resting scan, so we don't have any
> stimuli present.
>
> Best,
> Anais
>
> Sent fr
22 matches
Mail list logo