Dear all,
I'm new on FreeSurfer.
I want to calculate cortical thickness, hippocampus volume from MRI images
(obtained from ADNI).
After installation, I tried recon-all. >> Only this process, can I obtain
cortical thickness and hippocampus volume?
And someone told me that I have to set origin
Hi Anastasia,
One of Tracula's output is the "pathstats.overal.txt" and in this file we have
a list of numbers. Kindly what is the difference between the metrics average
and the metrics average center also which one do you recommend to do statistic?
Thanks,
Mohamad
_
Hi
I’ve previously encountered the same error. I’ve also tried to change
permission but that didn’t really work out for me. I have fixed it by
installing libjpeg62-dev: Maybe the following command could fix your problem
too?
sudo apt-get install libjpeg62-dev
Hope this might work for you?
Ch
Dear FS-experts
Is there any command that I can use for caching my preprocessed data in the
recon-all longitudinal stream, since this is possible through adding the
-qcache option in the cross-sectional pipeline. Or maybe this is already
automatically done without adding any option to the comma
I recently downloaded and installed
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-table-pub-v5.3.0.tar.gz .
I had been running this version previously but had to reload everything due to
a disk crash.
recon-all -all goes to completion with no errors.
freeview starts up fine but fails on loading a volume file
thank you. which labels are normally included as prefrontal cortex for
freesurfer purposes?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
>
> You can use mri_annotation2label to break up the annotation into
> individual labels, then use mris_label2annot to recombine selected
> labels i
Hi Ngoaka
no, you don't need to set the origin of the image. Just point recon-all at
a single slice from the correct dicom series (of a highres T1-weighted
scan) with the
-i -all -s
and you should be good to go
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, CHONNIKAN JONGKREANGKRAI wrote:
Dear all,
Hi Freesurfers,
I was wondering whether there is a good way to assess post-hoc how well the
alignment between two surfaces was. I wouldn't like to run the alignment
again, but I could, if necessary. I would like to compare this alignment to
a bunch of other alignments to see whether it was worse th
Dear Bruce,
Thank you for quick answer.
I can use .nii file instead of dicom, right?
Best Regards,
Ngoak
> On 4 พ.ย. 2557, at 22:06, Bruce Fischl wrote:
>
> Hi Ngoaka
> no, you don't need to set the origin of the image. Just point recon-all at a
> single slice from the correct dicom series (
You could also add a lot more voxels to the wm.mgz (beyond what is wm) and
depending on the source of the problem, that could fix it.
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Christina
it's tough to tell from just a single image, but it looks to me like you are
missing a bunch of white mat
Hi Robby,
depends on what you are trying to achieve.
The first stats model we implemented was the 2-stage model (with a
linear fit inside each subject and then a cross sectional comparison of
the atrophy rates, ie. slopes of the fit). For the first step the
surface data (within-subject) is al
What criteria would you use to determine one alignment was better than
another?
Peace,
Matt.
From: "Caspar M. Schwiedrzik"
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list
Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 at 7:17 AM
To: "Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
Subject: [Freesurfer] Quality of surface-based alig
Hi Doug,
Just wondering if you saw my response to your questions. Haven't heard anything
from anyone else yet about my questions. Thanks in advance. In case you
didn't see my response it is below:
I made the ROI on an individual subject basis, not from fsaverage. Not sure if
the labels I ma
Hi Caspar
the easiest way it so look at the parcellations and see if they are
accurate. Note that we do subject-to-atlas alignment, not
subject-to-subject (you get the latter by composing two atlas transforms)
cheers
Bruce
On
Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
> Hi Freesurfers,
> I
yes, that's fine
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, CHONNIKAN JONGKREANGKRAI wrote:
Dear Bruce,
Thank you for quick answer.
I can use .nii file instead of dicom, right?
Best Regards,
Ngoak
On 4 พ.ย. 2557, at 22:06, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Ngoaka
no, you don't need to set the origin of the image. Just poi
I don't know. Maybe someone else can weigh in.
doug
On 11/04/2014 07:38 AM, Anna Jonsson wrote:
> thank you. which labels are normally included as prefrontal cortex for
> freesurfer purposes?
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Douglas N Greve
> mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>
Hi Bruce and Matt,
I should specify that I am working with non-human primate data, so
unfortunately, looking at the parcellations would not work. I am aligning
individuals to a a custom template that I made.
I was wondering whether there is maybe an output file that has something
numerical on how m
You can look at how well the curvature and/or sulcal maps from your
template overlay on the individual.
doug
On 11/04/2014 11:46 AM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
> Hi Bruce and Matt,
> I should specify that I am working with non-human primate data, so
> unfortunately, looking at the parcellation
oh, I see. I would paint the folding patterns on the sphere.reg and
toggle back and forth between them to see if they look right.
Alternatively you could draw some sulci onto one of your datasets (this
is easy to do in tksurfer) and use mri_label2label to map it to others
and see if they land i
In that case, can you just use the mean thickness values as listed in
subject/stats/?h.aparc.stats ?
On 11/04/2014 10:33 AM, Smith, Michael wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Just wondering if you saw my response to your questions. Haven’t heard
> anything from anyone else yet about my questions. Thanks i
Thanks! But there is nothing like a number I could pull from the
registration process, e.g. the distances of the vertices in registration
space? Caspar
2014-11-04 11:51 GMT-05:00 Bruce Fischl :
> oh, I see. I would paint the folding patterns on the sphere.reg and
> toggle back and forth between t
Dear all,
I would like to draw a ROI on a group average surface (template) and map it
back to the surface of individual subjects. For this, I would like to create
the template based on my subjects, rather than using fsaverage. As far as I
understood, I should first create the template by using:
- This is a repost. It seems it did not come trough yesterday.
Apologies if this becomes a double post -
Hi all,
I noticed that during skull stripping the standard recon-all pipeline
uses option "-brain_atlas" in the routine "mri_watershed". However
documentation of this argument cannot be foun
use --trgsurfreg sphere.reg.myAvg
On 11/04/2014 12:27 PM, Roberta Santoro wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to draw a ROI on a group average surface (template) and
> map it back to the surface of individual subjects. For this, I would
> like to create the template based on my subjects, rat
Hi Tom
I'll cc Flo who wrote this code (a long time ago!). I think the
-brain_atlas flag takes a gca atlas and uses it to avoid large-scale
errors, while -atlas uses some built-in statistics about the shape and size
of e.g. the cerebellum to avoid erasing it accidentally. Flo can correct me
if
Dear Freesurfers,
I would like to mark the brain surface (fsaverage) for an illustration
of stimulation areas (TMS).
I have calculated coordinates in Vertex RAS and Vertex Talairach. They
are correctly located on the fsaverage surface in tksurfer.
Is there a way to create labels of equal sizes a
Hi Bastian
you should be able to do this with a tcl script in tksurfer. Take a look
at the ones we distribute for some examples
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Bastian
Cheng wrote:
> Dear Freesurfers,
>
> I would like to mark the brain surface (fsaverage) for an illustration
> of stimulation
Hi Bruce, thank you!
I looked up all commands here:
http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/TkSurferGuide/TkSurferScripting/TkSurferScriptingReference
I guess what I should do is
1) mark vertex at coordinate
2) create label at marked vertex
3) maybe dilate the label.
does this sound right?
On 4 November
yes, exactly
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Bastian Cheng wrote:
> Hi Bruce, thank you!
>
> I looked up all commands here:
> http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/TkSurferGuide/TkSurferScripting/TkSurferScriptingReference
>
> I guess what I should do is
>
> 1) mark vertex at coordinate
> 2) create label at marked ver
Hi Anastasia,
I started recently using Tracula to do tractography for my DTI data. I did the
analysis exactly as mentioned in wiki. The problem is that when I am repeating
the third step (trac-all -path -c ) for the same subjects to generate the
statistics; Tracula is updating all the informatio
you can try downloading our nightly 'dev' build of freeview, from here:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Download
or here's a quicker way (this is a one-line command... wget ):
wget
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/freeview/linux_centos6_x86_64/freeview.bin
and copy
31 matches
Mail list logo