Thanks! But there is nothing like a number I could pull from the registration process, e.g. the distances of the vertices in registration space? Caspar
2014-11-04 11:51 GMT-05:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>: > oh, I see. I would paint the folding patterns on the sphere.reg and > toggle back and forth between them to see if they look right. > Alternatively you could draw some sulci onto one of your datasets (this > is easy to do in tksurfer) and use mri_label2label to map it to others > and see if they land in the right place (central sulcus, calcarine, > sylvian, etc...) > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote: > > > Hi Bruce and Matt, > > I should specify that I am working with non-human primate data, so > > unfortunately, looking at the parcellations would not work. I am aligning > > individuals to a a custom template that I made. > > I was wondering whether there is maybe an output file that has something > > numerical on how much one surface had to be transformed to be aligned to > the > > other. > > I could alternatively compute the square difference between the two > > surfaces, or something like that. > > Thanks! Caspar > > > > 2014-11-04 11:19 GMT-05:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>: > > Hi Caspar > > > > the easiest way it so look at the parcellations and see if they > > are > > accurate. Note that we do subject-to-atlas alignment, not > > subject-to-subject (you get the latter by composing two atlas > > transforms) > > > > cheers > > Bruce > > On > > Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote: > > > > > Hi Freesurfers, > > > I was wondering whether there is a good way to assess post-hoc > > how well the > > > alignment between two surfaces was. I wouldn't like to run the > > alignment > > > again, but I could, if necessary. I would like to compare this > > alignment to > > > a bunch of other alignments to see whether it was worse than > > the others. > > > Thanks, Caspar > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Freesurfer mailing list > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom > > it is > > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > > e-mail > > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > > HelpLine at > > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you > > in error > > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender > > and properly > > dispose of the e-mail. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
