Hello FS experts,
I would like to to convert binary images from size 256,256,256 voxels to size
256, 256, 256.
Is there any FreeSurfer's module to make it?
Thank you very much
Andrea ___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://ma
Dear freesurfer,
I'm trying to perform parcellation on the cerebellum. After reading closely
freesurfer wiki and the questions related to this topic on the mailing
list, my understanding is that there is no way to perform fully automted
cerebellar parcellation on structural mri with freesurfer.
Co
Hi Charles
that is true at the moment, although we are working on something that
should be ready relatively soon.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, charles laidi wrote:
Dear freesurfer,
I'm trying to perform parcellation on the cerebellum. After reading
closely freesurfer wiki and the que
Hi Andrea
I think there is a typo in your email as your sizes are the same. If you
have a volume you would like to reslice it like you can use the -rl
option to do what you want.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Andrea Tateo
wrote:
Hello FS experts,
I would like to to convert binary i
Hi,
I am setting up freesurfer on a pc laptop for a colleague. I have
installed Oracle VM virtual box, Neurodebian, and FreeSurfer.
Freesurfer is now running, but when I try doing recon-all I get the error
message:
ERROR: FreeSurfer license file /usr/local/freesurfer/.license not found.
If
Hi Eva
is the file readable?
Bruce
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Eva Hilland wrote:
Hi,
I am setting up freesurfer on a pc laptop for a colleague. I have
installed Oracle VM virtual box, Neurodebian, and FreeSurfer.
Freesurfer is now running, but when I try doing recon-all I get the error
message:
I have seen this a few times and always something was wrong, either a line of
white space or so in the file / not enough truncated or some changes to the
file name like license.txt or so.
Hth,
Denis
--
Greg,
one of the -qcache outputs is named 'fwhm0', which will be unsmoothed.
you can also specify creation of just that file by adding '-fwhm 0' after
the -qcache flag.
Nick
> Hi ,
>
> I have winkler variety surface area data that is already smoothed and
> converted to vertex wise data on my a
Hi Freesurfer Experts,
Just to make it sure i have a question about correcting for cranial size.
I compared two groups, 100 patients versus 50 Controls. I entered a discrete
variable 'groups' (Patients: 1 and controls:2) in qdec. For cortical thickness
difference between these groups, do i
Hi Chris, if you want the detrended time series, use --eres-save which
will save a volume called eres.nii.gz
doug
On 12/09/2012 11:07 PM, Chris McNorgan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question regarding the yhat.mgh file generated from some
> resting-state functional data after running:
> mri_glmf
Hi Julia, that command is fine. It will not use the fieldsign or eccen.
doug
On 12/10/2012 10:17 AM, Julia Foecker wrote:
> Dear Doug,
>
> I tried version 5 with the commands suggested on the webside and this is
> working
> (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsFastIndividualRetinotopyAnaly
Soory if I bother you again,
actually I would like to convert from 256,128,256 to 256,256,256 and from
181,145,181 to 256,256,256.
Can you tell me the complete command and not just the option.
thanks immensely
Andrea
Messaggio originale
Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Data: 10-dic-201
do you want to increase the field of view and keep the same voxel size
or keep the same field of view and reduce the voxel size?
doug
On 12/10/2012 12:27 PM, Andrea Tateo wrote:
> Soory if I bother you again,
> actually I would like to convert from 256,128,256 to 256,256,256 and
> from 181,14
Hello,
Our data set has two T1 weighted scans for some subjects but only one for
others. Would you recommend running all subjects with no motion correction (1
scan input)? Also can files be mixed in the analysis that have had motion
correction with those who have not? Thanks!
-Andrew
___
Hi Summer, there is some documentation in mkanalysis-sess -help. It's
not very much documentation, so I just wrote a little bit more which I
have included below. Let me know if you still have questions.
doug
-abblocked PeriodSec
Design is AB-Blocked (ie, periodic, two condition). Specify the p
Hi,
when reconstructing the brains including manual edits, does the step that
incorporates control points "come before" the white matter edits? Ie so if
I do both control points and white matter edits, will the white matter
edits be take into account even if I just use -autorecon -cp , and not -wm
Hi Stan, I don't think you have to correct thickness for head size or
grey matter volume, but you should do so for subcortical volumes.
Whether you use ICV or GM volume or brain volume depends on what you
believe is happening and what hypotheses you want to test. Check out the
paper by Randy B
Hi Catherine,
Using the -autorecon-cp will take care of both cp and wm edits. Be sure
to run -autorecon3 afterwards if you are satisfied with the edits you
made.
-Louis
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Catherine Bois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when reconstructing the brains including manual edits, does the step th
In addition to the Buckner article, for other literature on the topic of
adjusting for volumes you can see:
O'Brien et al., Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 193:113-122 (2011)
Sanfilipo et al., Neuroimage 22:1732-1743 (2004)
I'll also mention that people sometimes use global global thickness as
Hi Shige, those are fine, but there is a warning here about performing
the mri_surf2surf step. You need to make sure that you are doing this
properly because it will run and complete even if you are not doing it
properly:).
to map the left hemi, run something like:
mri_surf2surf --srcsubject su
Hi Cathy
yes, control points come first, so autorecon2-cp will do the wm stuff
also
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Catherine Bois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when reconstructing the brains including manual edits, does the step that
> incorporates control points "come before" the white matter edits? Ie
Hi Jorge,
Thank you very much !! It worked !!
I used the new versions: /lme_mass_F1; lms_mass_fit1
/and/lme_mass_fit_vw1/, which you sent me for the old Matlab.
Additionally, I uploaded in Matlab - /lme_fit_init; lme_FSfit;
lme_Gradient; vec; lme_E1/; /fs_write_fstats; fs_write_Y;/
it ended
Hello
My trac- preproc has completed. However, I am confused about the
status message. It says:
#-
trac-preproc finished without error at Mon Dec 10 16:32:20 EST 2012
ERROR: cannot find /home/canlilab/SBU/data/recon_output/00387
Does this mean it was completed
I'm guessing that this shows up in the scripts/trac-all.log of a
particular subject? Then it applies to that subject.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, s0675204 wrote:
Hello
My trac- preproc has completed. However, I am confused about the
status message. It says:
#-
24 matches
Mail list logo