Dear Freesurfers.
I am trying to run trac-all on one subject and have a problem with the bvecs
file at the -prep stage.
After dtifit is started an error massage occurs: Error: bvecs and bvals don't
have the same number of entries.
I checked the dmri/bvals and dmri/bvecs. There seems to be a prob
Hi All,
I am running a retinotopy analysis, and when I look at the fieldsign
image all I see are a bunch of red and blue speckles.
Is this normal?
I am trying to figure out the horizontal and vertical meridians and am
not sure how to use the fieldsign image to do this. It's for my
thesis, i
Have you tried including the flag -cw256 with the recon-all command?
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:18, Sarah Rappaport - UoB` wrote:
> Hi!,
>
> I am new to FreeSurfer and I am having some difficulty with the T1
> reconstruction. My MRI files were Par Rec and converted to nii. I
> successfully conver
Hi Ignacio,
the thickness is definitely affected by factors such as sequence type,
field strength and acquisition parameters (not to mention age, maybe
gender, etc...) so I think you need to acquire your own control(s) on a
matched acquisition.
cheers.
Bruce
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Ignacio Let
Freesurfer experts,
I emailed last week with an error using recon-all. This problem has still
not been resolved. The summary of the problem should be shown below:
Thanks,
Ryan
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Ryan Hutten <
ryanhutten2...@u.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded mess
Then, and finally is this method the best way to determine whether exist any
cortical thickness anomaly, I mean, to use a normal control acquisition as
comparisson?
Thanks in advance
Ignacio.
2011/7/5 Bruce Fischl
> Hi Ignacio,
>
> the thickness is definitely affected by factors such as sequenc
Hi FS experts:
I have run a group analysis with Local Gyrification Index (LGI) and obtained
some statistical significant areas.Now I want to extract the information (lgi)
of each area.Based on the QDec Group Analysis page, the following command is
ran to examine cortical thickness:
mris_an
I can't say whether it's the best way, but it should be relatively unbiased
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Ignacio Letelier
wrote:
Then, and finally is this method the best way to determine whether exist any
cortical thickness anomaly, I mean, to use a normal control acquisition as
comparisson?
Thanks
Hello FS'users,
I'm trying to do an histogram of cortical thickness for 2 cases in matlab,
but the problem is that I have Installed matlab in a computer (windows) and
FS in another one (ubuntu)
Can I configure something to use the FS commands in matlab in order to
obtain some graphs?
And also, whe
Hi,
I have a couple of questions about Tksurfer's time course correlation option.
First, what type of correlation does it show? Does it use Pearson's r or
something else? Second, is there any way to get the same output from the
command line? From previous list discussions, it looks like it migh
Hi,
I am running freesurfer on 64 bit Fedora 10 linux.
I am using version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v4.3.0.
Can anyone point me to a reference web page listing what steps I need to
type to process
a series of MRI dicom slices and use FreeSurfer to measure cortical
thickness for
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FreeSurferBeginnersGuide
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 13:14, John Drozd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running freesurfer on 64 bit Fedora 10 linux.
> I am using version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v4.3.0.
> Can anyone point me to a reference web page l
Hi Carolina
There is a directory freesurfer/matlab which contains several matlab-based
scripts for reading and writing (after modified) surface- and volume-based data
generated in freesurfer.
Transport files from Linux to Windows will be tedious and things may not work
properly, therefore,
Hi Carolina,
the thickness in each region can be obtained either from the aparc.stats
file or in matlab by loading the thickness using read_curv.m and the
various label files with read_label.m. Make sure to account for the indices
being one-based in the return from read_curv.m, but zero-based i
recon-all \
-i \
-s \
-sd \
-all
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, John Drozd wrote:
Hi,
I am running freesurfer on 64 bit Fedora 10 linux.
I am using version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v4.3.0.
Can anyone point me to a reference web page l
Hello again.
I dug into the code and could locate the problem (I don't have a solution,
though. My coding skills are quite amateurish.) I think the problem somehow
lies in the format of my bvecs file.
flip4fsl is not able to read it correctly:
---
if (-e $inbvecs) then
echo "INFO: found
Hi All,
I am running a retinotopy analysis, and when I look at the fieldsign
image all I see are a bunch of red and blue speckles.
Is this normal?
Thanks.
Michelle
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.e
no, it's definitely not normal. Do you see any error messages? Can you
explain exactly what you did?
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Michelle Umali wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am running a retinotopy analysis, and when I look at the fieldsign
> image all I see are a bunch of red and blue speckles.
>
> Is this norma
Hi Franz,
Please refer to the following page:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/Tracula
Specifically Step7.2 for the format in which bvals/bvecs files should be
given as an input.
If your input bvals/bvecs are in the right format flip4fsl should not give
you an error.
Also if
Hi All,
I have run
recon-all -s -localGI
Now I want to get the gyrification Index of a particular label. Is there a way
to do that ?
Please let me know
Thanks
Ri
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.har
Hi Franz,
Sorry I just saw your previous email now. The problem could be due to the
variable decimal places you've used in your input bvecs file. I've
modified your bvecs file from the previous email to 3 decimal places
constantly for all the gradient values (See Attached!!). Can you check to
see
Hi Bruce and Pedro,
Thank you both for sending me your suggestions.
Just to let you know, because my .dcm (dicom) files had a space and two dots
in the filenames:
(e.g. "2008_12_08.ek -0035-0001-1.dcm" )
(and using quotes around the file name or "\ " within the filename without
the quotes did
sorry, but the majority of the time is required. We're working to speed
things up, but it is complicated software with multiple nonlinear warps,
segmentation procedures, etc
Bruce
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, John Drozd wrote:
Hi Bruce and Pedro,
Thank you both for sending me your suggestions.
this command can be used:
mri_segstats --annot my_subject_id lh aparc \
--i $SUBJECTS_DIR/my_subject_id/surf/lh.pial_lgi \
--sum lh.aparc.pial_lgi.stats
i've updated the lGI wiki page to include this as well.
n.
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 14:15 -0400, Ritobrato Datta wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I hav
Hi Ritobrato,
Nick already answered your query. Just a small add: the gold standard to use
local gyrification index is to compute vertex-wise analyses rather than
parcel-wise comparisons. Indeed, lGI at each point already quantifies the
gyrification in the surrounding region. As a result, the
Hi Bruce,
Okay, thank you. I understand and can see that to do an accurate job, the
pipeline must be complicated.
I have eight processors on my linux desktop computer.
Maybe some parts of recon-all are multi-threaded which could speed things up
for me :-)
Thank you,
John
2011/7/5 Bruce Fischl
and to further this, i added a section on the wiki page on how to use
qdec to perform a surface-based lgi analysis. basically, you just do
this:
To perform a vertex-wise analysis in QDEC of the lgi surface data, first
sample the results to the average template subject 'fsaverage':
recon-all -s
Sorry, that won't help a single subject much, although there are options to run
the hemis in parallel. You can run multiple subjects at the same time, which is
what we usually do. Or you can use cuss
On Jul 5, 2011, at 5:11 PM, John Drozd wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Okay, thank you. I understand
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the suggestion, Bruce. I'll run 8 different subjects at once.
Take care,
John
2011/7/5 Bruce Fischl
> Sorry, that won't help a single subject much, although there are options to
> run the hemis in parallel. You can run multiple subjects at the same time,
> which is what we
Hi Franz - Which of the files that you sent us are the original files (the
bvalfile and bvecfile from your dmrirc)? I could not find any files that
had 33 lines among your attachments so I'm not sure what your input files
look like.
Thanks,
a.y
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Franz Liem wrote:
> Hello a
how much ram do you have? You'll need at least 2G/subject if not 3
On Tue, 5
Jul 2011, John Drozd wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the suggestion, Bruce. I'll run 8 different subjects at once.
Take care,
John
2011/7/5 Bruce Fischl
Sorry, that won't help a single subject much, although the
mri_anatomical_stats will do that for you.
see mri_anatomical_stats --help
it would be something like:
mris_anatomical_stats -l ../label/lh.V1.label \
-t ./lh.beta.mgh \
-f lh.beta.stats \
my_subject_id lh
note that the column name will say 'ThickAvg' and 'ThickStd', whi
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for pointing this out to me about the RAM.
I have 8 Gb of RAM. So I guess I can safely run 3 or 4 subjects simultaneously
if each subject requires 2 to 3 Gb of RAM.
Thanks,
John
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011-07-05, at 6:08 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> how much ram do you have?
hi, expert,
How could I obtain the surface area of each region on the Desikan template?
How can I obtain this area in both native space and the average template space?
In the surf folder of each subjects, I noticed there is lh.area file, what is
meaning of this file? Do I need ?h.area for calcul
Hi all,
I'm trying to register two brain volumes using Freesurfer. I need to find a
mapping for each voxel of the MR image to the reference image. I tried using
mri_register with the option -vf as the wiki documentation suggests that it
outputs a vector field. Instead it expects a variance volume.
35 matches
Mail list logo