Hello,
When I run the function recon-all -subjid s00x -autorecon1 -autorecon2
-nonormalization I've got an ERROR message:
Skull Stripping
/root/trabajo/freesurfer/subjects/c1prueba/mri
mri_watershed -T1 -brain_atlas
/root/trabajo/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.gca
Dear all,
I am encountering a problem with 'recon-all -all' with one subject using
freesurfer version 4.5 which I did not encounter when using version 4.4.
With the older version, the stream ran without error, whereas the
processing produces the following error with version 4.5:
##
did you run out of disk space? Is the file
aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt writeable in the subject's dir?
On
Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Narly A Golestani wrote:
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am encountering a problem with 'recon-all -all' with one subject using
> freesurfer version 4.5 which I did not e
Hi Bruce,
There is plenty of disk space, and the
'aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt' file *has* successfully been
written to the subject's 'mri' directory.
best,
Narly.
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> did you run out of disk space? Is the file
> aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensi
if you run it again does it fail in the same place? If so, send us the
subject and we'll take a look.
Bruce
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Narly A Golestani wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> There is plenty of disk space, and the
> 'aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt' file *has* successfully been
> written to
Dear Julie,
The easiest way to preserve your data type would be to ask your Philips
representative to switch DICOM export to 16 bit representation of the data.
Alternatively, if you have access to an EasyVision console, you could try
converting your .PAR/.REC into Analyze files with Philips' own
Hi,
I've made an average of my subjects using make_average_volume. I've
registered each subject's orig.mgz with native-space diffusion images, and
created a label-like binary image (1 for included voxels, 0 for everything
else) which is in diffusion-space. I can register this back into the
subjec
1. No, if the surface is correct you are fine.
2. Not positive what you mean, but it looks fine to me.
3. The green is usually the "orig" surface, not the ?h.white one. This is
also a non-cortical region, so I wouldn't worry about it
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009,
Lena
Palaniyappan wrote:
I had got the same error output with v4.50 but not v4.01 for one of my
subjects. I guessed that something might be wrong with the skull-strip
process. So, I ran this step with different wsthresh values (from 20 to 30,
increased by 1), and found that the brainmask looked very similar if the
wsthresh
Hello all,
When I run the function recon-all -subjid s00x -autorecon1 -autorecon2
-nonormalization I've got an ERROR message:
Skull Stripping
/root/trabajo/freesurfer/subjects/c1prueba/mri
mri_watershed -T1 -brain_atlas
/root/trabajo/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.
Hi Africa,
-nonormalization flag skips the step where T1.mgz is generated which is
causing the error, as you mentioned. 001.mgz initiates the recon-all, but
there are several other steps and files generated in the process.
Please refer to this wiki to see which steps and the output at each st
Freesurfer users,
We are looking for new and experienced brain imagers with a background
in signal processing to work in our UCSF-affiliated research lab.
Please apply at the following link if interested:
http://jobs-ncire.icims.com/jobs/1448/job
thank you,
Brian
_
Hi all,
Does anyone have any recommendations for testing anatomical similarity
between 2 different subjects?
Jared
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Africa,
even if the script completed I doubt that it would generate reasonable
results without intensity normalization. You are better off using the
expert options to make it a gentler normalization (e.g. running
mri_normalize with -b $n -g $g
where n < 10 (the default) and g < 1. This wi
Hi Xiangchuan,
so you found recon-all stopped in the same place (writing
aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt)?
Bruce
On Wed, 18 Nov
2009, Xiangchuan Chen wrote:
> I had got the same error output with v4.50 but not v4.01 for one of my
> subjects. I guessed that something might be wrong with
15 matches
Mail list logo