Hi Jürgen,
a defect with 48000 vertices is huge (1/3 of the cortex). Check to make
sure that the skull and cerebellum aren't attached to the filled volume and
that the hemispheres are properly separated.
cheers,
Bruce
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Jürgen Hänggi wrote:
Dear FS experts
I tried to re
Dear FS experts
Is there any possibility to show only some and not all of the parcellations
of the lh.aparc.a2005s.annot annotation file?
We have looked for in the archives but did not find any answer
Thanks
Regards
Jürgen
Hi Juergen,
we supply matlab scripts for reading and writing the annot files, so it
should be easy enough to do - just set all the ones that you don't care
about to 0.
cheers,
Bruce
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Jürgen Hänggi wrote:
Dear FS experts
Is there any possibility to show only some and no
Hi,
In tksurfer, when I have loaded an overlay and then try to add a color bar,
I get this error message:
freeglut ERROR: Function called without first calling
'glutInit'
I'm using freeglut v 2.4.0. I don't know if this is caused by a bug in
freeglut (I think it's the latest version).
Anyone kno
Hello all,
I have recently been running some scans with very few defects, but have been
encountering a particular error message on occasion when I try to run it
through autorecon2 and autorecon3 after a bit of manual correction. The error
output is:
MRI_fill: could not read segmentation from
you can also use mris_annotation2label to convert the annotation to a
label, then use mri_label2annot to recombine only the ones you want
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Juergen,
we supply matlab scripts for reading and writing the annot files, so
it should be easy enough to do - just set all the ones
Which freesurfer version are you using? The recent builds are built
against a local glut lib, so it shouldn't be using the system glut lib.
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:06 +0100, Lars M. Rimol wrote:
> Hi,
> In tksurfer, when I have loaded an overlay and then try to add a color
> bar, I get this err
What version of freesurfer are you using now and what version was used
to process the data? I suspect mixed versions were used. You can rerun
with the -clean-aseg flag to start again.
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:43 -0500, Dankner, Nathan (NIH/NIMH) [F] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have recently been
Yes, the versions are different. I am not sure of the exact version numbers,
but I believe they are the 2 most recent releases. Do I need to run the scans
from autorecon1 with the clean-aseg command, or can I run them from later
processing steps? Thanks for your help,
Nathan
-Original
they can be started from the -autorecon2 stage (also include -
autorecon3).
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 12:05 -0500, Dankner, Nathan (NIH/NIMH) [F] wrote:
> Yes, the versions are different. I am not sure of the exact version numbers,
> but I believe they are the 2 most recent releases. Do I need to
Hi there,
I'm trying to copy the dlpfc label I've made using mri_label2label , but
keep getting the following error. I've tried putting in paths in the
command line, but haven't been able to rectify the problem. I was
wondering if this might be a permission issue with the freesurfer
folders. Any h
Are the labels in the subjects' 'label' directories? If not, then this
is usually fixed by putting the full path to the labels. Can you double
check that that failed?
Prapti Gautam wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to copy the dlpfc label I've made using mri_label2label , but
keep getting the foll
Yes, the labels are in the subjects' label directories; putting the full
path to the labels solved the problem. Thank you,
Prapti
-Original Message-
From: Douglas N Greve [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 8:39 AM
To: Prapti Gautam
Cc: Nick Schmansky; Fr
I attempted to re-run using the -clean-aseg flag, but this time got an error
which said:
ERROR: cannot find [subject path]/mri/aseg.mgz
Is the underlying problem that I used two different versions? Should I sync up
the two versions (one is on a server and one is on my desktop) in order to
avo
If you make use of the estimated Total Intracranial Volume (eTIV)
calculation found in the aseg.stats file of your subject data, then you
should be aware that we have recently found a more accurate way to make
this calculation. We have found that using the talairach.xfm transform
instead of the ta
this is probably stuff labeled as choroid in the aseg.mgz and won't
matter (it's not near cortex in any case).
cheers,
Bruce
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Dankner,
Nathan (NIH/NIMH) [F] wrote:
Hello,
In many of the surfaces that I have made, a frequent error seems to center
around the ventricles.
16 matches
Mail list logo