Re: [Freesurfer] Running TRACULA

2019-01-16 Thread Ainara Gomez
External Email - Use Caution Hi Anastasia, In the past days, we have obtained the original T1s from the original study and we are running Freesurfer in all of the subjects in order to run TRACULA correctly so we can avoid all the problems you mention. TRACULA is running in some of

Re: [Freesurfer] Running TRACULA

2019-01-11 Thread Yendiki, Anastasia
Have you checked the registration between the structural and diffusion? The concern here would be that some of your subjects' brains could look more like bert's brain than others, and the registration could be better for the former than the latter. You would have to ensure that this doesn't intr

Re: [Freesurfer] Running TRACULA

2019-01-11 Thread Ainara Gomez
External Email - Use Caution Hi Anastasia, thank you for your rapid response. Since I do not have the T1 of my subjects, I have not run the recon-all. Instead of that, I have copy-pasted the "mri" folder (including the aparc+aseg.mgz file) located in $FREESURFER_HOME/freesurfer/su

Re: [Freesurfer] Running TRACULA

2019-01-11 Thread Yendiki, Anastasia
Hi Ainara - What do you mean by default freesurfer files? Can you describe how you created each subject's recon-all style directory under SUBJECTS_DIR? TRACULA looks for $SUBJECTS_DIR/$subjectid/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz for each subject ID. a.y On Jan 11, 2019 8:30 AM, Ainara Gomez wrote:

[Freesurfer] Running TRACULA

2019-01-11 Thread Ainara Gomez
External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer experts, I am trying to run TRACULA as a complementary analysis on a patients and healthy controls sample. I have read in the tutorial that it is assumed that FreeSurfer has already been run on all the subjects' T1-weighted data because

Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula on a cluster

2014-03-13 Thread Anastasia Yendiki
. Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > > Emily > > - Original Message - > From: ebell...@uwm.edu > To: "Anastasia Yendiki" > Cc: "freesurfer" > Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 3:25:00 PM > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula on a cluster > > Hi Anast

Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula on a cluster

2014-03-13 Thread ebelleau
25:00 PM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula on a cluster Hi Anastasia, We use SLURM. I have not personally yet run bedpost off of the cluster, but one of my colleagues was able to run his data off of our cluster ( the whole pathway including bedpost) without any problem. However he

Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula on a cluster

2014-03-05 Thread ebelleau
for every subject and then made sure each one got assigned to a different processor in another script. Thanks, Emily - Original Message - From: "Anastasia Yendiki" To: ebell...@uwm.edu Cc: "freesurfer" Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 3:02:14 PM Subject: Re: [Freesur

Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula on a cluster

2014-03-05 Thread Anastasia Yendiki
Hi Emily - Which job management system does your cluster run on? Have you ever tried to run any of the FSL parallelized programs, like bedpostx, on your cluster? a.y On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote: > > Hello, > > I plan on running a batch of subjects (around 80) on a computer clus

[Freesurfer] Running Tracula on a cluster

2014-03-05 Thread ebelleau
Hello, I plan on running a batch of subjects (around 80) on a computer cluster. I am assuming that in the dmrirc configuration file, I can enter all of the subjects in subjlist? However, do I have to add something to it to make sure that each subject gets sent to a different processor on the

Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula: trac-preproc exited with ERRORS

2012-12-07 Thread Anastasia Yendiki
Can you please send the text files instead of pasting them in the email? Thanks! On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, s0675204 wrote: Hello I think I spoke to soon! It ended with errors again. I get the error message: "bvecs and bvals don't have the same number of entries" I saw on some older messages on

Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula: trac-preproc exited with ERRORS

2012-12-07 Thread s0675204
Hello I think I spoke to soon! It ended with errors again. I get the error message: "bvecs and bvals don't have the same number of entries" I saw on some older messages on the mail-base you said that we need to check that the number of entries in the bvals is same as and bvecs is 3 times as muc

Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula: trac-preproc exited with ERRORS

2012-12-07 Thread Anastasia Yendiki
Hi Prerona - You need to uncomment the bvecfile and bvalfile definitions in your configuration file. Hope this helps, a.y On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, s0675204 wrote: Hello I am trying to run Tracula on a set of dicoms files. I have run recon-all previously. I am getting a message trac-preproc exit

[Freesurfer] Running Tracula: trac-preproc exited with ERRORS

2012-12-07 Thread s0675204
Hello I am trying to run Tracula on a set of dicoms files. I have run recon-all previously. I am getting a message trac-preproc exited with ERRORS Please can anyone advise me on this? I have listed all the details (command, error/output, config file) below Thank you so much for your help best w

Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula -bedpostx and -path

2012-04-24 Thread Richard Binney
Thanks - appears as if all is well. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Anastasia Yendiki < ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > > Hi Richard - I'd check your bedpostx output files, run mri_info on them to > make sure they have the right number of slices. The monitoring script that > produces the

Re: [Freesurfer] Running Tracula -bedpostx and -path

2012-04-24 Thread Anastasia Yendiki
Hi Richard - I'd check your bedpostx output files, run mri_info on them to make sure they have the right number of slices. The monitoring script that produces the "slices processed" messages checks only every once in a while, so you won't see a separate message for each slice. The warnings f

[Freesurfer] Running Tracula -bedpostx and -path

2012-04-24 Thread Richard Binney
Hi Anastasia, I ran bedpost directly: bedpostx dmri It seemed to run fine, not exiting with any errors. the only thing that concerned me was that the last output in the terminal was 50 slices processed [when I have 54] queing post-processing stage then it exited. It seemed to run rather quicke