FWIW, my final lists of regions that I think can be returned by default
recon-all for the '2000' and '2009' parcellations are attached.
Lists come from the FreeSurfer LUT, with an extra TISS__TYPE column of
(grep-able) tissue labels compiled from mri_binarize.c and also just by
checking names. (T
Hi-
Just gently re-bumping this question/thread.
Noting that the previous thread with recommendations about non-GM ROIs,
which I used in the coming up with the GM list above, is here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg50005.html
Thanks,
pt
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at
And, a minor clarification on one of the ROIs in question--
I should have phrase the comment about ROI #80 as follows:
80 non-WM-hypointensities ---> *should be in list of FS_nongm?
... since the name clearly implies that it is non-WM.
Basically, I am first wanting to check that the ab
Hi, Doug-
I've looked more into my earlier question of identifying FS-returned
regions, in particular:
1) which regions of the whole FreeSurferColorLUT.txt seem to get returned
by default recon-all calls (for either the 2000- or 2009-parc+segs); and
2) which of those regions are GM and non-GM (WM
