hmmm, no idea. Can you send me the recon-all.log file for that subject?
On
Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Angel Wong wrote:
> Hi Bruce
>
> I have downloaded the latest version (v4.5.0) and tried again. But
> unfortunately, I cannot reproduce the results same as yours. The new
> generated results are similar t
Hi Bruce
I have downloaded the latest version (v4.5.0) and tried again. But
unfortunately, I cannot reproduce the results same as yours. The new
generated results are similar to the results generated by the older version.
The command I used is
recon-all -i -s -sd
-all
and I viewed the images
Hi Nick
Thanks for your suggestion. I will look at it in detail later.
Angel
2009/10/10 Nick Schmansky
> Angel,
>
> I noticed you have problems with some remaining dura in your images. you
> might want to try a new utility that is being tested for inclusion in a
> future release. Its from a g
Angel,
I noticed you have problems with some remaining dura in your images. you
might want to try a new utility that is being tested for inclusion in a
future release. Its from a group in Singapore, and does a good job
removing dura. Its called:
mri_gcut
and can be downloaded for the linux and
My version is 4.3.0. I will download the latest version and try again.
Thank you.
2009/10/10 Bruce Fischl
> I didn't do anything but run recon-all with the latest version. Remind me
> what version you were running?
>
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Angel Wong wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce
>>
>> Thank you very mu
I didn't do anything but run recon-all with the latest version. Remind me
what version you were running?
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Angel Wong wrote:
> Hi Bruce
>
> Thank you very much. The result looks much better than mine. How did you do
> that? Please let me know so that I can modify the other data
Hi Bruce
Thank you very much. The result looks much better than mine. How did you do
that? Please let me know so that I can modify the other datasets if I face
the same situation again.
Cheers
Angel
2009/10/10 Bruce Fischl
> Hi Angel,
>
> I'm just about done running the dataset and the results
I see. Your TR is quite short and your TE relatively long, so this is
probably pretty poor CNR between gray and white. If you send me the
orig.mgz I'll take a look and see if it's fixable
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Angel
Wong wrote:
> Hi Bruce
>
> Attached please find the parameters for acquiring the
eek, that looks pretty bad. Can you tell us what the acquisition
parameters are?
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Angel Wong wrote:
> Dear all
>
>
>
> Actually I would like to perform automated reconstruction for my T1 image
> and then obtain anatomical labels after cortical parcellation. I have done
> fully
