back from vacation. Thanks ever so much for this Pedro. It will keep me
on track.
Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior wrote:
Matt,
I have a table I use sometimes. It contains 12 references I believe
are the most important and their role in recon-all process.
Regards,
PPJ
2008/9/12
Pedro,
That was a really helpful organizational tool for the rest of us - Matt, I
also hope you found it helpful. Thanks!
Margaret
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt,
> I have a table I use sometimes. It contains 12 refer
Hi Matt,
the Segonne paper is the current skull stripping (the hybrid one), although
it's evolved somewhat since then (unpublished). The segmentation is both
those papers (the first one is the segmentation methodology, the 2nd is the
addition of a nonlinear warp), plus the more recent one with
Hi Bruce,
for sure, I didnt expect it to all be in one place!
For example, what I believe are the original papers (Neuroimage 9 1999,
and the 1993 Cognitive Neuroscience paper), describe the first method,
then we have all the other subsequent papers. So for example, does the
current methodolo
Hi Matt,
the methodologies are described in those papers. Sorry, I don't think
there's any one or two paper summary - it's just too much stuff over the
years (topology correction, segmentation, surface analysis, morphing,
etc).
Bruce
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Matt Clarkson wrote:
Dear ever
Dear everyone,
Hopefully someone can help me. If I do "recon-all --help" i can see a
list of 31 steps for the main cortical thickness pipeline. Does anyone
have a list that links each of the 31 steps to the most current
methodology paper?
I've been reading most of the methodology papers re
