Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-25 Thread Keri Woods
External Email - Use Caution Good thing it's not the software :) Also makes it easier for me to fix. In my script there was one tiny mistake - the anatomical image for one subject was repeated each time instead of using the files for different subjects. I ran recon-all 100+ times o

Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-25 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Yes, that file is the only thing linking the functional to the anatomical. It's too bad you messed up the files, but I'm relieved it was not my software:). On 1/25/19 5:09 AM, Keri Woods wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hi Douglas Thanks very much for getting back to me. I created n

Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-25 Thread Keri Woods
External Email - Use Caution Hi Douglas Thanks very much for getting back to me. I created new separate directories and re-processed one of the problem subjects individually, and the registration worked well. So the problem is that the anatomical and functional images come from di

Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-24 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Can you tar up the anatomical and functional analyses and send them to me through our filedrop? https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/ when it asks for an email of the recipient, use gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On 1/23/19 5:57 AM, Keri Woods wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution >

Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-23 Thread Keri Woods
External Email - Use Caution I meant some are nearly perfect. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:49 AM Keri Woods wrote: > Hi Douglas > > Thanks for the response. > > No, some of the registrations are fine. Some are close, but not perfect, > while others are very bad. > > I've checked t

Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-23 Thread Keri Woods
External Email - Use Caution Hi Douglas Thanks for the response. No, some of the registrations are fine. Some are close, but not perfect, while others are very bad. I've checked the subjectname file for some subjects with poor registration (eg 20_101), and they are correct. Tha

Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-22 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Are you saying that all of them have bad registrations? Some of them (eg, 20_1, 20_10) look like they should be good. Others (eg, 20_101) look like they could be bad. For the bad ones, are you totally sure that the subjetname file has the correct name of the subject? On 1/21/19 3:19 AM, Keri Wo

Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-21 Thread Keri Woods
External Email - Use Caution Hi Douglas Thank you for your reply. I'm using freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.1-f53a55a I am using whole brain data. The functional and structural images were acquired in different sessions on the same day, I don't know if that compl

Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-18 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
What version of FS are you using? version 6 initializes with mri_coreg (the FS equivalent of spm_coreg). On whole-brain data, I've found this to be very robust. Is your data whole-brain? On 1/18/19 5:10 AM, Keri Woods wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hi I have a problem very simila

[Freesurfer] FSFAST poor registration

2019-01-18 Thread Keri Woods
External Email - Use Caution Hi I have a problem very similar to this one: https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg23206.html I've tried the suggestions given there, but it didn't fix my problem. I'm running the FSFAST preproc-sess stream and the quality