Re: [Freesurfer] Advice - best method, longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

2015-04-18 Thread Pradeep
Thanks you for the reply. Martin, the scans are 0,14 and 21 days a part. I will run a few more subjects and check the results as you suggested. On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > you should also plot them on the same axes (or at the very least with the > same limits) > > On

Re: [Freesurfer] Advice - best method, longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

2015-04-17 Thread Bruce Fischl
you should also plot them on the same axes (or at the very least with the same limits) On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Martin Reuter wrote: Hi Pradeep, is this the result of a single subject? In a single subject lot's of things can happen (e.g. motion artefacts can affect a single time point, other imagi

Re: [Freesurfer] Advice - best method, longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

2015-04-17 Thread Martin Reuter
Hi Pradeep, is this the result of a single subject? In a single subject lot's of things can happen (e.g. motion artefacts can affect a single time point, other imaging or measurement noise will have effects). Also how far are the time points apart? Run the same thing with 20 subjects and you

Re: [Freesurfer] Advice - best method, longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

2015-04-16 Thread Pradeep
Hello All, I have pre-processed a subject that has T1 scans at 3 time points using the freesurfer cross-sectional and longitudinal methods. The results show a lot of variability. I have attached the plots. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks, Pradeep On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Pra

Re: [Freesurfer] Advice - best method, longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

2014-06-04 Thread Alexandru Hanganu
Thank you very much for your answer Bruce ! have a nice evening, Alex. Le 3 juin 14 7:6, Bruce Fischl a écrit : > Hi Alex > > I would think that longitudinal analysis is still the way to go as we try > to improve both reliability and sensitivity using the fact that we have > multiple scans/subj

Re: [Freesurfer] Advice - best method, longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

2014-06-03 Thread Martin Reuter
te:06/03/2014 6:15 PM (GMT-05:00) To: FS Mailing List Subject: [Freesurfer] Advice - best method, longitudinal vs. cross-sectional Hello Everyone, could someone please give us an advice about which method you consider is the best for our study ? we have two groups with MRI at Time 1. Each

Re: [Freesurfer] Advice - best method, longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

2014-06-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Alex I would think that longitudinal analysis is still the way to go as we try to improve both reliability and sensitivity using the fact that we have multiple scans/subject. cheers Bruce On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Alexandru Hanganu wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > could someone please give us an adv

[Freesurfer] Advice - best method, longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

2014-06-03 Thread Alexandru Hanganu
Hello Everyone, could someone please give us an advice about which method you consider is the best for our study ? we have two groups with MRI at Time 1. Each group received medication. After this we performed another MRI at Time 2 after 2 weeks. The best method for this study is a longitud