Hi Pradeep,

is this the result of a single subject? In a single subject lot's of things can happen (e.g. motion artefacts can affect a single time point, other imaging or measurement noise will have effects). Also how far are the time points apart? Run the same thing with 20 subjects and you should see significantly reduced variablility in the longitudinal stream vs the cross sectional one.

Best, Martin

On 04/16/2015 01:12 PM, Pradeep wrote:
Hello All,

I have pre-processed a subject that has T1 scans at 3 time points using the freesurfer cross-sectional and longitudinal methods. The results show a lot of variability. I have attached the plots. Any advice would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Pradeep

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Pradeep <tprad...@gmail.com <mailto:tprad...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Hello All,

    I have pre-processed a subject that has T1 scans at 3 time using
    the freesurfer cross-sectional and longitudinal methods. The
    results show a lot of variability. I have attached the plots. Any
    advice would be much appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Alexandru Hanganu
    <al.hang...@yahoo.ca <mailto:al.hang...@yahoo.ca>> wrote:

        Thank you very much for your answer Bruce !

        have a nice evening,

        Alex.


        Le 3 juin 14 7:6, Bruce Fischl a écrit :
        > Hi Alex
        >
        > I would think that longitudinal analysis is still the way to
        go as we try
        > to improve both reliability and sensitivity using the fact
        that we have
        > multiple scans/subject.
        >
        > cheers
        > Bruce
        > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Alexandru Hanganu wrote:
        >
        >> Hello Everyone,
        >>
        >> could someone please give us an advice about which method
        you consider is
        >> the best for our study ?
        >>
        >> we have two groups with MRI at Time 1. Each group received
        medication. After
        >> this we performed another MRI at Time 2 after 2 weeks.
        >>
        >> The best method for this study is a longitudinal one or a
        cross-sectional
        >> GLM ?
        >>
        >> We consider that the distance between the time points is
        too small, and the
        >> longitudinal method is not the best choice. Hence, this
        study should be
        >> treated as a cross-sectional one. In this case we think
        about performing a
        >> simple GLM with the contrasts:
        >> 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
        >> or 1 -1 -1 1
        >>
        >> for the groups:
        >> 1) grp 1 time 1
        >> 2) grp 1 time 2
        >> 3) grp 2 time 1
        >> 4) grp 2 time 2
        >>
        >> we are searching to see whether medication had any impact
        on the cortical
        >> morphology in each group and between the groups.
        >>
        >> Thank you !
        >> Best regards,
        >> Alex.
        >>
        >>
        > _______________________________________________
        > Freesurfer mailing list
        > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
        <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
        > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
        >
        >
        > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
        person to whom it is
        > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
        error and the e-mail
        > contains patient information, please contact the Partners
        Compliance HelpLine at
        > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
        sent to you in error
        > but does not contain patient information, please contact the
        sender and properly
        > dispose of the e-mail.
        >
        >

        _______________________________________________
        Freesurfer mailing list
        Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
        <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
        https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer





_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

--
Dr. Martin Reuter

Instructor in Neurology
  Harvard Medical School
Assistant in Neuroscience
  Dept. of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital
  Dept. of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital
Research Affiliate
  Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab,
  Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,
  Massachusetts Institute of Technology

A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301
Charlestown, MA 02129

Phone: +1-617-724-5652
Email:
   mreu...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   reu...@mit.edu
Web  : http://reuter.mit.edu

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to