The values look about right in the table. Your pipeline looks ok,
thought the last step uses fa_FOLDER-NAME.mask.nii instead of the output
of mri_vol2vol (fa_FOLDER-NAME.nii).
doug
On 03/17/2013 02:16 AM, Rotem Saar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I run into somthing that seems odd to me and want
2013/3/5 Rotem Saar
> Hi
>
> Attached is some pictures that might help ? Is this what you meant ?
> Looking at this again - something is weird but I can't say what...
> I can ZIP the data of one subject and send it to you but I don't feel
> comfortable asking you to personally examine it...
> Hop
Hi Rotem
that's always a problem with FA estimation (the partial volume stuff I
mean). It's hard to diagnose this without seeing some images. Can you send
some of the registration?
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Rotem Saar
wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your answer and sorry about the
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your answer and sorry about the delay in mine.
Registration seems fine, but I came up with some questions regarding it -
1) When testing the registration, using the "compare" button, I can see
both the diffusion and what is suppose to be the anatomical slices - but
why do the
Hi Rotem
that does sound high. Have you checked the registation between your
diffusion data and the anatomicals?
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Rotem Saar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I run into somthing that seems odd to me and wanted to consult -
> I run the following script for getting the FA
Hi all,
I run into somthing that seems odd to me and wanted to consult -
I run the following script for getting the FA values from my DTI scans:
1) dt_recon --i /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/FOLDER-NAME/DTI/I1.dcm
--s FOLDER-NAME --o /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/FOLDER-NAME/DTI --b
/usr/lo
