Thank you, Martin!
Mihaela
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Martin Reuter
wrote:
> Hi Mihaela,
>
> probably you are trying to run the localGI on a longitudinal directory. As
> the help text output says, you need to make sure you tell that to recon-al
> by passing the original command again (incl
Hi all,
I have a problem maybe relevant to the orientation of images in freeview. I
have two images, one is fMRI and one is MRI. They are produced from the
same machine at the same time. I loaded both of them in freeview and it
showed they are matched very well, even they have different resolution
Hi - Running topup is not a problem. Just make sure that there's as many
entries in the gradient table and b-value table as there are frames in the DWI
file. So if with topup you're combining 2 sets of DWIs (collected with opposite
phase-encode directions), you also have to combine the correspon
Hello Freesurfer, I played around with mri_normalize for control point section by changing the parameters using -b 20 or 23 and writing it in an expert file. However, when I ran recon-all -autorecon2-cp -autorecon3 -expert expert.opts, the command showed "mri_normalize - mprage -noconform ) se
Hi,
I would like to preprocess my dti data with topup (from FSL) before running
trac-all. Is this a sensible approach? When I tried running trac-all -prep
with the output file from topup (*_hifi_nodif.nii.gz) I got an error message:
mv -f /usit/abel/<>/topuop/146/dmri/bvecs
/usit/abel/<.
The same thing happened to me on my mac when I changed the FREESURFER_HOME
variable in the terminal, but not in the .bashrc file that I source when the
terminal opens.
Hope this helps!
Thanks,
Doug
Douglas Merkitch
Neurological Sciences
Rush University Medical Center
On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:4
Hello Juhyoung,
If its complaining about "RB_all_2008-03-26.gca" then something must have
happened where you still have portions of the old freesurfer installed, or
your mixing versions because Freesurfer v6 has no mention of
RB_all_2008-03-26.gca. Please try completely removing the
/Applications/
Thank you, we did that, and it was indeed an issue with the way we ran it.
Diana
> El 9 feb 2017, a las 18:19, Douglas Greve
> escribió:
>
> It says that it was "Killed" which sounds like the job exceeded some resource
> on the supercomputer. You should contact the administrators to see what
hello antonin,
Thanks for the correction.
Best,
Paul
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Antonin Skoch wrote:
> Dear Paul,
>
> for the most recent version 6.0 the default is 10.
>
> Looking at the help of mris_inflate binary and also to the source code.
>
> Antonin
>
>
> Hello Falk Chris and Antoni
Dear Paul,
for the most recent version 6.0 the default is 10.
Looking at the help of mris_inflate binary and also to the source code.
Antonin
Hello Falk Chris and Antonin,
The default is 55 https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_inflate.
Best,
PaulOn Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Falk
Computational Neuroscience Research Position
The Division of Psychiatric Neuroimaging in the Department of Psychiatry and
Behavioral Sciences at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, has an
opening for talented candidates with strong computational and programming
skills. The successful c
It says that it was "Killed" which sounds like the job exceeded some
resource on the supercomputer. You should contact the administrators to
see what the limits are and whether you exceeded them. You can also run
the same subject on a regular computer and see if it dies in the same place.
On
Hi,
I used following command to extract LGI values from a set of subjects:
recon-all -s -localGI
Output stats is saved in lh.aparc_lgi.stats file. By default, its
calculating LGI values of 35 areas using *Desikan-Killiany Atlas *but I am
interested in calculating LGI values using Yeo atlas of 7
Hello Falk Chris and Antonin,
The default is 55 https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_inflate.
Best,
Paul
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Falk Lüsebrink
wrote:
> Dear Chris and Antonin,
>
> I found in some archived message or in the wiki that the default used to
> be 50 iterations at s
Hi Chris
the smaller the voxels the more you will need to inflate. I'm hoping to
find some time to make this adaptive as in principal it's all computable,
but haven't gotten to it yet.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 9 Feb
2017, Christopher Markiewicz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I'm reading this
>
Dear Chris and Antonin,
I found in some archived message or in the wiki that the default used to be 50
iterations at some time in previous releases of FreeSurfer for standard
recon-all. Therefore, I changed it to 50 as default for every resolution in the
recent release. This works fine for exam
Dear Chris,
I have found that -n 15 is for our 0.7x0.7x0.7mm3 data not enough.
I determined optimal value -n 30, empirically, by looking at the shape of
inflated surface with various number of iterations. Over -n 30 there was almost
no further progression in inflation.
I suppose that better m
Hi all,
If I'm reading this <
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SubmillimeterRecon> correctly,
the current best practice for `-hires` is to include an expert file
containing "mris_inflate -n 15", and that this should work for all voxel
sizes (0.75mm)^3 - (1mm)^3? Or do we need to empirical
Hi Mihaela,
probably you are trying to run the localGI on a longitudinal directory. As the
help text output says, you need to make sure you tell that to recon-al by
passing the original command again (including the -long ….) and instead of -all
you specify -localGI.
Renaming hides from recon
Hi Tamara,
that depends on where you edit. Cross or base or long. Generally when editing
in the longitudinal stream you always use the same recon-all command that you
used initially, and only replace the -all with the new flag to tell it to start
later in the process (here -autorecon2-noaseg )
Hi Matthieu,
sorry for the late reply. Yes you should be able to do that (as long as it is
consistent for all subjects). Test it for one subject and then run the rest.
Best, Martin
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 16:51, Matthieu Vanhoutte
> wrote:
>
> Dear experts,
>
> Does anybody could answer my la
Hello Freesurfer team!
Having gone through the instructions for making use of the parallelization
in Freesurfer v6, I'm confused as to how exactly the calls for fine grained
and coarse grained paralleization differ. As per the release notes,
following is stated -
*Parallelization: a new flag was
Dear FreeSurfer developers,
I am a new FreeSurfer user and I am trying to run it in a supercomputer
for the first time.
Recon-all finished with errors (see log attached) during skull stripping.
I have searched the archives and only found that it could be a memory
problem, but I am unsure ab
23 matches
Mail list logo