hello antonin, Thanks for the correction. Best, Paul On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Antonin Skoch <a...@ikem.cz> wrote:
> Dear Paul, > > for the most recent version 6.0 the default is 10. > > Looking at the help of mris_inflate binary and also to the source code. > > Antonin > > > Hello Falk Chris and Antonin, > The default is 55 https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_inflate. > Best, > Paul > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Falk Lüsebrink <falk.luesebr...@ovgu.de> > wrote: > > > Dear Chris and Antonin, > > > > I found in some archived message or in the wiki that the default used to > > be 50 iterations at some time in previous releases of FreeSurfer for > > standard recon-all. Therefore, I changed it to 50 as default for every > > resolution in the recent release. This works fine for example for up to > > 0.5x0.5x0.5mm3 data. > > > > I'd also say, more is better and I have not experienced any drawbacks. > > Processing time doesn't seem to increase noticeably, too. > > > > Best, > > Falk > > > > ------------------------------ > > *Von:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh. > > harvard.edu]" im Auftrag von "Antonin Skoch [a...@ikem.cz] > > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2017 16:20 > > *An:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > *Betreff:* Re: [Freesurfer] Expert file for recon-all -hires > > > > Dear Chris, > > > > I have found that -n 15 is for our 0.7x0.7x0.7mm3 data not enough. > > > > I determined optimal value -n 30, empirically, by looking at the shape of > > inflated surface with various number of iterations. Over -n 30 there was > > almost no further progression in inflation. > > > > I suppose that better more than less. But maybe experts can correct me or > > provide better suggestion. > > > > Antonin > > > > Hi all, > > > > If I'm reading this > > <https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SubmillimeterRecon> correctly, > > the current best practice for `-hires` is to include an expert file > > containing "mris_inflate -n 15", and that this should work for all voxel > > sizes (0.75mm)^3 - (1mm)^3? Or do we need to empirically determine the best > > value for a given voxel size, and if so, what should be the criteria for > > making this determination? > > > > Thanks, > > Chris Markiewicz > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it > is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in > error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. > >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
