Just following up on this - thanks!
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 1:29 PM, Morenikeji Adebayo
> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I’m running into difficulty executing the “selexavg3-sess” command for a few
> participants. For example, when I run the command:
>
> foreach c(lh rh mni305)
> selxavg3-sess -anal
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [Freesurfer] PVE correction tool within the V 6 beta
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 17:08:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: m.ba...@ulg.ac.be
To: Freesurfer support list
Dear Greve,
Thank you for your answer. Steps 1 and 2 are ok but in step 3 the
Hi Doug,
Thanks for checking the data!
I just removed the output volume, ran the command again and got the same
weird output.
Since it worked for you, I tried it again… no change.
However, then I noticed that the mri_vol2label uses the SUBJECTS_DIR path
and this was not set to this folder (I was t
not really - that's the price you pay for voxelizing. I guess you could
thicken it a bit or fill the ribbon and do some type of morphological
erosion
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Kevin Aquino wrote:
Ah sorry for not being clear,
Basically I would like the output from mris_surf2vol with the mask option
Try removing -ba_labels (it will do that with -all anyway)
On 9/29/15 9:02 PM, 葉丁瑞 wrote:
Dear All,
I ran the following script:
recon-all -i /Volumes/yang/S002_AD1118_20090116/NCKU-0003--1.dcm -s
S002_ba -sd /Volumes/yang/S002_AD1118_20090116/ -all -ba_labels
and got the error below at
I'm at a loss here. I run the exact same command with the same version.
I get the same terminal output, but my output volume looks ok. The only
thing I can think of is that there is an old version that output volume
that is not getting overwritten. Can you name the output file
differently and m
Hi,
Thank you very much for your response. The output of that command was:
tle7@sni-vcs-gotlib:~$ ls -l /home/tle7/freesurfer/bin/mri_convert
-rwxrwx--x 1 tle7 stanford 1672136 Aug 15 2010
/home/tle7/freesurfer/bin/mri_convert
tle7@sni-vcs-gotlib:~$
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:39 AM, dgw wrote:
It is probably changing the data type from short to float. Try adding
-odt short --no_scale 1
You can also look at the data type with
mri_info --type file.nii
On 10/1/15 10:52 AM, Shaun Patel wrote:
> I noticed after running slice-time correction with SPM, the resulting Nifti
> files do not
I don't think I would use "DTI Morphometry" to describe it. I'm not sure
what term I would use. It is basically a FA ROI analysis
On 10/2/15 1:28 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thank you very much for your answers!
Kindly I have one more question:
At the end of DTI analysis using the
What you use depends on what you are trying to do. Starting with the
sig.mgh is good because it has not been corrected for multiple
comparisons. You have a pretty high threshold (4, which means p<.0001).
Try lowering it to 2 or even 1.3 to see if any activation pops out. At
some point you'll ne
Sorry, as I am quite new to this type of analysis, does the sig.mgh show
any significance? if so how can I report it? I mean are they saved
somewhere in SUBJECTS_DIR?
Also, it seems the corrected one does not show anything, am I true?
The last thing about this, shall I use sig.mgh or F.mgh?
Many
Timothy,
What is the output of this command:
ls -l /home/tle7/freesurfer/bin/mri_convert
?
hth
d
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Timothy Quang-Tin Le wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried the chmod command, but it did not work. How I check that I've
> downloaded the correct version?
> Thank you very much
>
Hi,
I tried the chmod command, but it did not work. How I check that I've
downloaded the correct version?
Thank you very much
Timothy
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> can you try chmod a+x on one of them and see if it can then be executed?
> e.g.:
>
> chmod a+x /home/tle7/f
Hi Doug,
Thank you very much for your answers!
Kindly I have one more question:
At the end of DTI analysis using the tool “dt_recon” we will have “ stats”
file including the FA value for every segment and parcellate in the brain.
Depending on this output can we use the term “ DTI morphometry” t
Try using Method 1 from this version of mri_surf2vol
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/mri_surf2vol
On 10/2/15 11:38 AM, Kevin Aquino wrote:
Ah sorry for not being clear,
Basically I would like the output from mris_surf2vol with the mask
option to be less speckled
what about them?
On 10/2/15 1:20 PM, Ali Radaideh wrote:
Thanks Douglas,
The second line worked fine, but can I show you the results attached
to this email?
Thanks,
Ali
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Douglas Greve
mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
I notice from the image t
Try
cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subject/scripts
mris_anatomical_stats -mgz -cortex ../label/lh.cortex.label -f
../stats/lh.yeo.stats -b -a ../label/lh.yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot
-c ../label/aparc.annot.ctab subject lh white
On 10/2/15 12:19 PM, Ali Radaideh wrote:
I am trying to extract the cort
I notice from the image that the overlay is turned off. Try turning it
on. Also, you can try
tksurferfv fsaverage lh inflated -aparc -ov sig.mgh
If that does not work, then
tksurfer fsaverage lh inflated -aparc -ov sig.mgh
On 10/2/15 12:08 PM, Ali Radaideh wrote:
Hi,
I am running a group a
I am trying to extract the cortical volume, thickness, and area based on
these 17Networks cortical parcellation.
Thanks,
Ali
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Douglas Greve
wrote:
> You should not use both --seg and --annot. What are you trying to
> accomplish?
>
> On 10/2/15 3:34 AM, Ali Radaide
Ah sorry for not being clear,
Basically I would like the output from mris_surf2vol with the mask option
to be less speckled.
For example, in the image attached:
http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~aquino/example_mri_surf2vol.png
there are some voxels missing. Is there an option to fill these voxels?
Your best bet I fear might be to try and build FreeSurfer yourself on
your specific distro of Ubuntu.
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReadOnlyCVS
While not impossible (we have done this), it does require some detailed
knowledge of Linux in general and Ubuntu in particular as you
You should not use both --seg and --annot. What are you trying to
accomplish?
On 10/2/15 3:34 AM, Ali Radaideh wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I have used the following command line:
mri_segstats --seg scz01/mri/aseg.mgz --annot scz01 lh
lh.yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot --sum scz01.aseg.sum
and got the
Thanks for you reply, Rudolph.
We have a cluster environment in our university, and the best Ubuntu
version to us for now is Ubuntu 12.04 (in a closest future we will update
to a newer version, but not now...).
In the download page there is only FreeSurfer for CentOS, Mac and a Virtual
Machine of
Hi Kevin
I'm not clear on what you need. Would mri_surf2vol --fillribbon do what
you want? I don't really know what else "voxelize" means
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Kevin Aquino wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to "voxelize" the cortical surfaces generated in freesurfer and
I am a little st
Hi Alberto
1. No, this is not the same. The control points are used to estimate the
bias field, which can affect an entire regions. Replacing a voxel in the
brainmask with a 110 will only affect that voxel.
2. You can do this if you want but you have to be careful how you edit.
When we turn
Hi Trinh
can you just attach the images? Your link didn't work for me. You can check
the topology of the surface computationally using mris_euler_number. You
might also try moving backwards/forwards a few slices to try to understand
what is going on.
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 2 Oct
2015, Thục T
Hi,
Thanks for the great FreeSurfer Course this past week.
After running through Tracula and extracted the path stats (by voxel) across
all subjects, can I apply mri_glmfit to test the group differences using the
generated txt file that has all subject's diffusion meassure (e.g., FA) along
part
Hi all,
I am trying to "voxelize" the cortical surfaces generated in freesurfer and
I am a little stuck.
I have been using mris_surf2vol with the --mask option however this
generates a very speckled representation of the cortical surface on the
voxels. What I would prefer would be the level sets
Alberto,
I included detailed replies below, but I have a question before you get
to those. Why don't you want to follow the FreeSurfer techniques for
reconstruction? You suggested several other ways, but I don't understand
your motivation for not wanting to follow the instructions for FreeSurfe
Dear developers/users?
When I load a *mgh.sig* file in *TkSurfer* and I go on *Configure
Overlay Display* and want to change the *min Threshold on 1.3* or
wathever number I can't edit or do that?
did somebody encounter the same problem?
How can you solve it?
Thank You.
--
Oana Georgiana Rus
That's super Eugenio,
Thanks so much. Exactly what I needed.
Cheers
Erik
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Eugenio Iglesias [e.igles...@bcbl.eu]
Sent: 02 October 2015 10:57
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurf
Hi Erik,
one possible way of doing this:
1. For a single subfield: set the color map to Lookup Table. Tick "show as
isosurface in 3d view". Tick "label volume". Then, set both values of the range
to the numeric code of the subfield you want to display (e.g., for CA1, it
would be 206).
2. For
I have some questions about how to manually correct the white matter regions
.
It's the same manually edit the volume "brainmask.mgz" and use control
points? Would I get the same result? My intention is not to use control
points, but directly replace the voxels that have not been classified as whi
Hi Freesurfer experts,
I've run the subfield analysis with Dev v6 and am just wondering if it is possible to display only certain subfields (say the CA1 and Subiculum rendered in 3D using freeview? Can I also render the entire hippocampus that is basically the addition of all
the subfields gi
Hi Bruce,
I have used the following command line:
mri_segstats --seg scz01/mri/aseg.mgz --annot scz01 lh
lh.yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot --sum scz01.aseg.sum
and got the following:
# ColHeaders Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName
1 0 15766121 15766121.0 Seg
2 2182848
35 matches
Mail list logo