Re: [Freesurfer] graph average ROI

2009-02-18 Thread Nick Schmansky
Jenifer, The line is stddev (of the mean line in the plot). Nick On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 12:05 -0600, Juranek, Jenifer wrote: > Hi, > > I’m running fsv420 on RHEL4. Within the qdec module (v1.2) menu > options, View, Graph the ROI à generates average +/- SD or SE? > > > > Many Thanks, > > J

Re: [Freesurfer] volume changes

2009-02-18 Thread Nick Schmansky
Jared, Try adding the flag -ns 1 to your mri_convert command. Nick On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 11:33 -0500, Jared Price wrote: > Dear gurus, > when running mri_convert -rt nearest -ot nii -rl 001.mgz seg_edited.mgz > seg_edited_axial.nii to reslice from coronal to axial space we are > seeing some s

FW: [Freesurfer] Group Cortical Thickness

2009-02-18 Thread Jeff Sadino
Thank you for your quick reply Doug. After looking, I think you are referring to the mri_glmfit tool? Is this the webpage to look at first to get started learning about how to do cortical thickness group analysis? http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/GroupAnalysis Thank you, Je

Re: [Freesurfer] permutation / mc-z simulation failure?

2009-02-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
All those clusters are pretty small, so it does not surprise me that they are not sig. Your command-lines look ok. I don't think the results will change with more iterations. dogu Burmicz, Ryzarda wrote: Hello, I have just run a number of permutation and mc-z on data that was previousl

Re: [Freesurfer] Group Cortical Thickness

2009-02-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
If this is just a thickness study, then you dont need fsfast. There are examples/tutorials of this type of analysis in the wiki. Look through that and see if you still have questions. doug Jeff Sadino wrote: Hello, I want to run group statistics on the cortical thickness for a study with 3 g

[Freesurfer] Group Cortical Thickness

2009-02-18 Thread Jeff Sadino
Hello, I want to run group statistics on the cortical thickness for a study with 3 groups, each with about 30 subjects. To do this, I need to create an average cort thickness map for each group. We are interested in basic statistics, so nothing too advanced. I am wondering what would be the

[Freesurfer] mris_divide_parcellation with same area

2009-02-18 Thread Jose Luis Cantero Lorente
Dear FS Team, I used mris_divide_parcellation to create a new parcelation with smaller regions, but they result in different sizes. I would need to get smaller cortical parcellated regions, but all of them with similar areas. How can I get it? Could I decide the area size of each new parcellate

Re: [Freesurfer] Manual segmentation

2009-02-18 Thread Kelly Silva
Hi, Douglas     I´m making changes in aseg.mgz and I need to know how is the comand to save the changes in the new segmentation (in tkmedit: File - New segmentation, or File - Save segmentation or if there is another comand in the menu to save the changes).   

[Freesurfer] graph average ROI

2009-02-18 Thread Juranek, Jenifer
Hi, I'm running fsv420 on RHEL4. Within the qdec module (v1.2) menu options, View, Graph the ROI --> generates average +/- SD or SE? Many Thanks, Jenifer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailma

Re: [Freesurfer] permutation / mc-z simulation failure?

2009-02-18 Thread Pratap Kunwar
Hi Rysia, Your commands looks fine to me, and 5000 iterations is good enough to see significant cluster. You might want to try lowering your threshold to 1.3 (0.05 p value). thanks pratap > Hello, > > > > I have just run a number of permutation and mc-z on data that was > previously analysed us

Re: [Freesurfer] getting vertex numbers

2009-02-18 Thread Rudolph Pienaar
Lars M. Rimol wrote: Hi, I've done a glm model fit comparing cortical thickness between two groups, and have certain areas ("blobs") on the cortical surface that are above sig. threshold. I'd like to get a list of the vertex numbers for each of these significant areas, which do not correspond

[Freesurfer] permutation / mc-z simulation failure?

2009-02-18 Thread Burmicz, Ryzarda
Hello, I have just run a number of permutation and mc-z on data that was previously analysed using qdec. Unfortunately none of my clusters reach significance (in some cases there are no clusters found at all) and I am unsure as to what I am doing wrong. I am running freesurfer v4.1.0 on Cent

Re: [Freesurfer] Manual segmentation

2009-02-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
can you be more specific? What are you using to create the manual segmentations? Kelly Silva wrote: Hello, I´d like to know what´s the comand to save the new manual segmentations of the subcortical structures. Thanks, Kelly --

Re: [Freesurfer] volume changes

2009-02-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
Undoubtedly, your 001.mgz has larger voxels, and so there will be some changes in seg volumes. A better way to do this is with mri_label2vol. First, you'll need the right registration file. Get that with: tkregister2 --mov 001.mgz --targ orig.mgz --regheader --reg reg.001.dat --noedit Now ru

Re: [Freesurfer] getting vertex numbers

2009-02-18 Thread Pratap Kunwar
Hi, Try like this, Click inside your blobs. Then click on the Custom Fill botton and then select "upto functional value below threshold". This will select the cluster above the given p value (1.3 in our case). Then click "fill". Then click file->label->save selected label this should work. pr

[Freesurfer] Manual segmentation

2009-02-18 Thread Kelly Silva
Hello,    I´d like to know what´s the comand to save the new manual segmentations of the subcortical structures.   Thanks, Kelly Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com___

[Freesurfer] volume changes

2009-02-18 Thread Jared Price
Dear gurus, when running mri_convert -rt nearest -ot nii -rl 001.mgz seg_edited.mgz seg_edited_axial.nii to reslice from coronal to axial space we are seeing some significant volume changes in the segmentation. Anyone know why or how to fix it. Jared __

[Freesurfer] getting vertex numbers

2009-02-18 Thread Lars M. Rimol
Hi, I've done a glm model fit comparing cortical thickness between two groups, and have certain areas ("blobs") on the cortical surface that are above sig. threshold. I'd like to get a list of the vertex numbers for each of these significant areas, which do not correspond to the parcellations in FS

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec area measure

2009-02-18 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Mike, we haven't looked at them a lot, but we have found them to be biologically meaningful at least in one case that I can think of. cheers, Bruce On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Michael Harms wrote: Here is a question related to this whole discussion (prompted by what Darren wrote): As a practi

RE: [Freesurfer] Qdec area measure

2009-02-18 Thread Don Hagler
It seems to me that vertex areas in the native subject space are not meaningful. The orig surfaces should be uniformly tesselated; however, topology correction and final surface finding should introduce complicated and probably uninteresting variation. But, if a subject's surfaces are resampl