If your OS is also 64bit, then you can use the x86_64 dist of freesurfer.
You can confirm this by typing:
uname -m
and you should see:
x86_64
4GB is plenty of RAM and 320GB is plenty of disk-space.
Nick
> Hi,
> I want to use freesurfer to quantify cortical thickness, and I want
> t
Hi,
I want to use freesurfer to quantify cortical thickness, and I want
to use the software under Linux fedora core 4. My computer's equipment is
Quad-Core processor Intel Q6600, DDR2 memory 4GB, Sata2 disks 320G,
GeFORCE8600. Which version do you recommend? i386? or x86_84?
Thanks
__
I can unpack these without a problem locally. Nick is preparing a new
minor stable release in which these fixes will be present.
doug
ps. If you just can't wait, you can get new versions of the following
(linux) binaries
mri_convert
mri_parse_sdcmdir
mri_probedicom
here:ftp://surfer.nmr.mg
Is this data on line here at the NMR center? Can you point me to it?
Dan Dillon wrote:
Dear FreeSurfers,
Our group has encountered an error while unpacking the first set of
data we acquired on Bay 2 since the upgrade. Here's our command line:
unpacksdcmdir -src 07120620/ -targ . -generic -
Dear FreeSurfers,
Our group has encountered an error while unpacking the first set of data we
acquired on Bay 2 since the upgrade. Here's our command line:
unpacksdcmdir -src 07120620/ -targ . -generic -scanonly SUBJ.out
We then modify the .out file from
1localizer ok 512 51
You should be able to use mri_convert for this.
mri_convert --in_type mgz --out_type analyze INPUT.mgz OUTPUT.img
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mri_5fconvert
Thanks.
Mithra.
On Dec 10, 2007 2:54 PM, Anca-Larisa Sandu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question about conversion
Can you try running it with:
-volid orig.mgz
let me know if that works
doug
anisha narula wrote:
Hello,
I am doing a retinotopy study, and when I view the slices using the
sliceview-sess command I obtain activation in the regions desired.
However, when I view results on the flattened patc
mri_convert file.mgz file.img
should do it
cheers,
Bruce
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anca-Larisa Sandu wrote:
I have a question about conversions.
Is it possible to convert a file with the extension
".mgz" from Freesurfer to a file with the extension
".img", which can be read for example in SPM? If i
Try something like
mri_convert orig.mgz orig.img
Anca-Larisa Sandu wrote:
I have a question about conversions.
Is it possible to convert a file with the extension
".mgz" from Freesurfer to a file with the extension
".img", which can be read for example in SPM? If it is
possible how should I do
I have a question about conversions.
Is it possible to convert a file with the extension
".mgz" from Freesurfer to a file with the extension
".img", which can be read for example in SPM? If it is
possible how should I do this conversion?
Thank you in advance!
Anca Sandu
__
Fantastic. Thanks for the speedy responses.
Jim Porter
Graduate Student
Clinical Science & Psychopathology Research
University of Minnesota
Nick Schmansky wrote:
Jim,
There is a way to insert special flags into the recon-all command stream
for a particular binary. See the section 'E
Jim,
There is a way to insert special flags into the recon-all command stream
for a particular binary. See the section 'EXPERT OPTIONS FILE' in
recon-all --help. So you would create a file called expert.opts
containing:
mris_make_surfaces -fix_mtl
and then add the string '-expert expert.opts'
yes, although the white matter volume that comes from mris_wm_volume is
affected by the aseg (since non-wm voxels that are interior to the
?h.white surface are removed from the volume calculation)
cheers,
Bruce
On Mon, 10 Dec
2007, Chris Watson wrote:
Hi,
So if the volumes are estimated fro
Hi,
So if the volumes are estimated from the surfaces and not aseg.mgz, does
this mean it is unnecessary to edit aseg.mgz? Or is it still necessary,
but only for the subcortical structures? Is it best to make pial
surface/wm.mgz edits and control points for grey and white matter, and
aseg.mgz
Hi Jim,
yes, I think that should be fine
Bruce
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, James N. Porter wrote:
Hello Bruce-
From the wiki, I gather that I would rerun recon-all from -finalsurfs onward,
as that is the step that calls make_final_surfaces. In order to insert the
fix_mtl flag I'll have to run that
Hello Bruce-
From the wiki, I gather that I would rerun recon-all from -finalsurfs
onward, as that is the step that calls make_final_surfaces. In order to
insert the fix_mtl flag I'll have to run that section via a separate
command line outside of recon-all. Are there any other subsequent step
Hi Bruce,
Thanks a lot! This one does work as described and provides me with
information I need.
--
Sergey
Hi Sergey,
here's read_annotation.m. It should also return the embedded colormap
that's in the .annot file, including structure names. Not sure why
it's not in your distribution.
c
Hello,
I am doing a retinotopy study, and when I view the slices using the
sliceview-sess command I obtain activation in the regions desired. However,
when I view results on the flattened patches, activation is messed up.
I tried running the tkmedit-sess command.
tkmedit-sess -analysis rtopy -cont
18 matches
Mail list logo