Re: [Freedos-user] Grr ... (Was: Re: mTCP-2011-10-01 is available

2011-10-06 Thread Ralf A. Quint
At 10:51 PM 10/5/2011, bloger wrote: >÷ ÏÔ×ÅÔ ÎÁ ÓÏÏÂÝÅÎÉÅ ÔÏ×ÁÒÉÝÁ Michael B. >Brutman, ÄÁÔÉÒÏ×ÁÎÎÏÅ 5-Oct-2011 19:39: > On >10/5/2011 7:27 PM, Alain Mouette wrote: > > I >had problems with networking in dos for a few >users, a short time > > ago. After a lot of >headache, I discovered that

Re: [Freedos-user] Grr ... (Was: Re: mTCP-2011-10-01 is available

2011-10-06 Thread Ulrich Hansen
Thanks for the suggestions. I tested mTCP ftpsrv again *) with these values: MTU 1472 FTPSRV_FILEBUFFER_SIZE 16 FTPSRV_TCPBUFFER_SIZE 16 FTPSRV_PACKETS_PER_POLL 2**) Now look at the results! Upload from Mac to DOS server real machine virtualbox EZ-NOS 2

Re: [Freedos-user] Grr ... (Was: Re: mTCP-2011-10-01 is available

2011-10-05 Thread bloger
В ответ на сообщение товарища Michael B. Brutman, датированное 5-Oct-2011 19:39: > On 10/5/2011 7:27 PM, Alain Mouette wrote: > > I had problems with networking in dos for a few users, a short time > > ago. After a lot of headache, I discovered that those were > > conections via ADSL that used PP

Re: [Freedos-user] Grr ... (Was: Re: mTCP-2011-10-01 is available

2011-10-05 Thread Alain Mouette
Em 05-10-2011 21:39, Michael B. Brutman escreveu: > On 10/5/2011 7:27 PM, Alain Mouette wrote: >> So now I use >> MTU=1472 >> and I had no more problems ever since. I recommend to anyone, use 1472 >> to avoid problems. > Ah, interesting! I should put that tip in the user notes. > > I set a

Re: [Freedos-user] Grr ... (Was: Re: mTCP-2011-10-01 is available

2011-10-05 Thread Michael B. Brutman
On 10/5/2011 7:27 PM, Alain Mouette wrote: > I had problems with networking in dos for a few users, a short time ago. > After a lot of headache, I discovered that those were conections via > ADSL that used PPPoE, which has a 28 bytes overhead. > > So now I use > MTU=1472 > and I had no more pro

Re: [Freedos-user] Grr ... (Was: Re: mTCP-2011-10-01 is available

2011-10-05 Thread Alain Mouette
I had problems with networking in dos for a few users, a short time ago. After a lot of headache, I discovered that those were conections via ADSL that used PPPoE, which has a 28 bytes overhead. So now I use MTU=1472 and I had no more problems ever since. I recommend to anyone, use 1472 to a

Re: [Freedos-user] Grr ... (Was: Re: mTCP-2011-10-01 is available

2011-10-05 Thread Michael B. Brutman
Excellent, and you are welcome! I am glad it is working this time around - I get embarrassed when I let broken code out. Some questions: For best performance the following should be set in the mTCP config file: MTU 1500 FTPSRV_FILEBUFFER_SIZE 16 FTPSRV_TCPBUFFER_SIZE 16 FT

Re: [Freedos-user] Grr ... (Was: Re: mTCP-2011-10-01 is available

2011-10-05 Thread Ulrich Hansen
Thanks for this nice DOS FTP server! I installed it under FreeDOS 1.0 in VirtualBox 4.1.4 (32 MB RAM) and on a real machine (Compaq Contura Aero 4/33 20MB RAM). I then compared the performance of mTCP ftpsrv with other DOS FTP-servers. The competition was: EZ-NOS 2 [1], Datalight sockets ftpd

[Freedos-user] Grr ... (Was: Re: mTCP-2011-10-01 is available

2011-10-04 Thread Michael B. Brutman
Sorry everybody .. the FTP Server was tragically broken under FreeDOS. I have coded a workaround for some bad drive detection code that I put in and uploaded a new release of mTCP. Thanks go to Ulrich, Eric and Ralf for reporting the problem and helping me debug it. (I don't fully understan