I have tried eLinks on Linux. I was unaware of the full edition
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:09 PM Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
> Have you tried the more recent compiles that incorporate JavaScript?
> Indeed, there is a text only edition of links, but the full edition for
> the most part works rather well
Have you tried the more recent compiles that incorporate JavaScript?
Indeed, there is a text only edition of links, but the full edition for
the most part works rather well.
Speaking personally one thing I find frustrating about it is the fact it
seems not to support cookies.
Just my take,
Kar
In my experience, Links is not very compatible with modern web pages.
I use it and like it, but it is a text browser. It does not have very
much CSS support. My understanding is that the two most
feature-complete browsers for DOs are Dillo and Arachne. Maybe someone
knows of some more advanced ones
Hello Andrea and all others in the group:
Thank you all for your replies regarding Dillo Web Browser.
I had been under the impression Dillo was a better web browser and may
be worth the effort to get functioning, but there appears to be more
negative reports, along with the fact it is not real
Il 07.12.2020 00:35 Thomas Mueller ha scritto:
>> Ciao a tutti,
>
>> Ho installato il browser web Dillo alcune volte e non è nemmeno mai
stato avviato. Ho corretto la variabile del percorso in DILLO.BAT ma
senza successo.
> Qualcuno pu
>
>>
> span> La mia esperienza con Dillo
in NetBSD è c
Il 06.12.2020 22:38 Dean Galloway ha scritto:
> Hello all,
>
>
I've installed Dillo web browser a few times and it's never even
>
started. I corrected the path variable in DILLO.BAT but no success.
>
>
Can someone let me know if there are certain "tricks" that need to be
>
performed befor
I just realized the importance of setting up a cross compiler on my linux
machine while I was unzipping the source for openssl and remembered of the
limit of 8.3 filenames :/
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 18:08, Jamie Le Tual wrote:
> what was the error when it failed to compile?
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020
what was the error when it failed to compile?
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 18:07, Louis Santillan wrote:
> That's one thing that has troubled me about Links2. I've been able to
> compile it for Mac and Linux but not DOS.
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:35 PM Jamie Le Tual
> wrote:
> >
> > I would be cur
That's one thing that has troubled me about Links2. I've been able to
compile it for Mac and Linux but not DOS.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:35 PM Jamie Le Tual wrote:
>
> I would be curious to know which tool chain they used to compile it
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:26, Jose Senna wrote:
>>
>> T
I would be curious to know which tool chain they used to compile it
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:26, Jose Senna wrote:
> The only Web browsers for DOS with TLS support I
> know of are recent versions of Links.
>
>
>
> ___
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Fre
The only Web browsers for DOS with TLS support I
know of are recent versions of Links.
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
> Hello all,
> I've installed Dillo web browser a few times and it's never even started.�
> I
> corrected the path variable in DILLO.BAT but no success.
> Can someone let me know if there are certain "tricks" that need to be
> performed before I can get it going?
> Thanks,
> Dean.
My exper
I have had success with dillo before in a VM. Could you give us more
details? Does it give any information? Does it silently execute? Does
it freeze? It sounds like it is frozen.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 1:39 PM Dean Galloway wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I've installed Dillo web browser a few times an
Hello all,
I've installed Dillo web browser a few times and it's never even
started. I corrected the path variable in DILLO.BAT but no success.
Can someone let me know if there are certain "tricks" that need to be
performed before I can get it going?
Thanks,
Dean.
_
> NO. Arachne supports 8086, Dillo never will.
Will Arachne actually run an an 8086? I ran it on a 80486 and even then
it was slow...
-Original Message-
From: dos386
To: freedos-user
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2011 2:10 am
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo web browser for DOS - beta2
>
> Honestly, I wanted one of these days to start a thread here about
> Arachne. Last I heard, Glenn had (mostly) stopped working on it
completely in 2008-Dec, 3 years ago, R.I.P. :-(
> but there's at least one other fork (EDIT: rayandrews ??) that has
> some updates and rewrites
most is from BEFO
> does this DOS port of DILLO make Arachne obsolete?
NO. Arachne supports 8086, Dillo never will.
Arachne has bugs and Dillo has bugs, but they have DIFFERENT
code origins and different WATT code, so they have DIFFERENT
bugs ... so if one doesn't work just try the other one (and some more).
> Al
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Op 26-11-2011 18:32, nospam schreef:
>
>> http://nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos.googlecode.com/files/DILLODOS_beta2.zip
>
> does this DOS port of DILLO make Arachne obsolete?
I doubt it, though it's probably easier to rebuild as
Hi Georg Potthast & Benjamin Johnson,
Thanks for Dillo-DOS beta2!
--
Marcos Fávero Florence de Barros
Campinas, Brazil
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructu
Hi Bernd,
whether Arachne is obsolete I leave to the users to decide. My objective is
to provide a better browser than Arachne. However, Dillo will never be able
to really compete with Firefox or Chrome.
I compressed dillo.exe as you described and gained a file that is 300k
smaller. I did not
Op 26-11-2011 18:32, nospam schreef:
> http://nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos.googlecode.com/files/DILLODOS_beta2.zip
Hi Georg,
does this DOS port of DILLO make Arachne obsolete?
Also would using UPX (best mode) on the executable have any advantage?
Compression-wise it takes a while due t
Hi,
Benjamin Johnson added file downloads and loading web pages from disk to
Dillo. Great! To make these major enhancements available on my website I
uploaded a new beta version:
http://nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos.googlecode.com/files/DILLODOS_beta2.zip
I added support for extended c
On Nov 23, 2011, at 11:58 PM, dos386 wrote:
>> I wonder if a "workaround" would be to detect Dillo on the web site
>
> Please don't do it like that ... it's just recycling this B.S. "technology":
>
> if (detectIE5)
> make IE5 happy
> else
> if (detectIE5.5)
>make IE5.5 happy
> else
>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:58 PM, dos386 wrote:
>
>> I wonder if a "workaround" would be to detect Dillo on the web site
>
> Please don't do it like that ... it's just recycling this B.S. "technology":
>
> if (detectIE5)
> make IE5 happy
> else
> ...
> endif
Most sites dropped IE6 already.
> I wonder if a "workaround" would be to detect Dillo on the web site
Please don't do it like that ... it's just recycling this B.S. "technology":
if (detectIE5)
make IE5 happy
else
if (detectIE5.5)
make IE5.5 happy
else
if (detectIE6)
make IE6 happy
else
if (detectO
I have not tested dillo for DOS; just the win32 port (on wich DOS port
is based)
Win32 port have problems with code pages on non-english texts. See this
example:
http://tinypic.com/r/2exmpgi/5
Was this solved on DOS version
--
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Marco A. Achury
Tel: +58-(212)-6158777
Cel: +5
Thanks!
Looks like Dillo doesn't support background images in CSS, and/or the
display:none directive, so it's displaying the word "FreeDOS" in the
H1 instead of an image. I can fix that on the web site.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Marco Achury wrote:
>
> Here is a screenshot of freedos.o
the FreeDOS pages are examples of pages Dillo will not render
>> properly.
>>
>> Provided you have a packet driver running on your PC, just look through the
>> Dillo.bat file and after that you should be able to run DILLO.
>>
>> Georg
>>
>> -
; Georg
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "jhall"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 4:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo web browser for DOS
>
>
>> Thanks for posting a screenshot of Dillo visiting www.freedos.org. Just
>>
.
- Original Message -
From: "jhall"
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo web browser for DOS
> Thanks for posting a screenshot of Dillo visiting www.freedos.org. Just
> curious, does the rest of the FreeDOS site render corre
> Just curious, does the rest of the FreeDOS site render correctly on Dillo?
The stuff on the left side is far below (bad, not visible on the
shot), no further tests.
FASM forum (php-BB2) looks good (as long as no big images inside) but
produces warns after posting ... php-BB3 looks a bit messy.
Thanks for posting a screenshot of Dillo visiting www.freedos.org. Just
curious, does the rest of the FreeDOS site render correctly on Dillo? I use
standard HTML & CSS, but does Dillo have support for the CSS directives I'm
using?
I haven't had time to tinker with Dillo yet, but maybe you could
> Here is a screenshot of Dillo for DOS running
Another one (shot in DOS but uploaded in Windaube):
http://board.flatassembler.net/files/d_948.png
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains
Thanks :-) It does something ... upload doesn't work (in Win32 version
it works with minor trouble) ... HTTPS doesn't work ... posting in
FASM forum works (without attachments only) ... FTP is "strange" ...
and there are hangers (temporary and permanent) ...
---
t; To:
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 5:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo web browser for DOS
>
>
>>I have spotty Internet service right now (traveling, again) so I may have
>>to wait until tomorrow to post this on the FreeDOS web site. Sounds
>>exciting!
>
The only part of this I will answer is the last,
No none of that is true for the screen reader.
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi Karen,
>
>> At the risk of seeming like a baby, may I have a direct link?
>
> www.bttr-software.de/forum/board_entry.php?id=10797&page=0&order=time&categor
Hi Karen,
> At the risk of seeming like a baby, may I have a direct link?
www.bttr-software.de/forum/board_entry.php?id=10797&page=0&order=time&category=0
mentions at least two builds:
http://nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos.googlecode.com/files/DilloDos-beta1-SFN.zip
and
http://nanox-m
This is the direct link:
http://nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos.googlecode.com/files/DilloDos-beta1-SFN.zip
Georg
- Original Message -
From: "Karen Lewellen"
To:
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo web browser for DOS
At t
jhall"
To:
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo web browser for DOS
I have spotty Internet service right now (traveling, again) so I may have
to wait until tomorrow to post this on the FreeDOS web site. Sounds
exciting!
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:15 P
"
To:
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo web browser for DOS
>I have spotty Internet service right now (traveling, again) so I may have
>to wait until tomorrow to post this on the FreeDOS web site. Sounds
>exciting!
>
>
>
> On Nov
I have spotty Internet service right now (traveling, again) so I may have to
wait until tomorrow to post this on the FreeDOS web site. Sounds exciting!
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:15 PM, "Marcos Favero Florence de Barros"
wrote:
> Hi Georg,
>
>> The Dillo web browser has been ported to DOS now.
Hi Georg,
> The Dillo web browser has been ported to DOS now.
This came as a complete surprise to me. Thanks very much! This is
great news for us DOS users.
Dillo worked immediately in my Pentium 166 under FreeDOS.
Marcos
--
Marcos Fávero Florence de Barro
В ответ на сообщение товарища nospam,
датированное 17-Nov-2011 21:27:
> Here is a screenshot of Dillo for DOS running:
>
Nice! I will try it.
--
bloger
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
Here is a screenshot of Dillo for DOS running:
http://code.google.com/p/nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/wiki/Dillo_Web_Browser_Screenshot
Georg
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
co
The Dillo web browser has been ported to DOS now. You can download the first
beta here:
http://code.google.com/p/nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/downloads/list
I recently ported the FLTK toolkit to DOS. Based on that I could port the
Dillo GUI to DOS. Benjamin Johnson, who ported Dillo to W
45 matches
Mail list logo
