Hello Daniel,
I am unfamiliar woththe C languages, but does it also allow one to mix
both assembly in with the C source code? Are there any other languages
In short, yes, most C compilers allow you to write "in-line" assembly
inside a C language source file.
However, note that this is not a
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 8:30 PM Daniel wrote:
>
> I am unfamiliar woththe C languages, but does it also allow one to mix both
> assembly in with the C source code? Are there any other languages that
> allows mixing of assembly in with the language code?
Not in the manner you are thinking of.
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:29 PM Daniel wrote:
>
> A little info for those who uses FreeBasic (or even Power Basic 3.5) in
> FreeDOS. In case noone knows this, it is possible to mix both Basic and
> Assembly language in the same source code using both PB and FB using the
> ‘ASM’ command. T
A little info for those who uses FreeBasic (or even Power Basic 3.5) in
FreeDOS. In case noone knows this, it is possible to mix both Basic and
Assembly language in the same source code using both PB and FB using the
‘ASM’ command. This is something I have been doing in PowerBasic for some
time.
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 5:53 PM Aitor Santamaría wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 00:00, Rugxulo wrote:
>>
>> I can send you my local copy (or show you how to get it) of the 3.2.2
>> cross-compiler (i8086-msdos) that works under latest HX pre-releases.
>> It has a built-in assembler and linke
Hello,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 00:00, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> > - Assembler - there is NASM, not compatible with MASM/WASM. I guess
> there is still (J)WASM as
> > alternative, as I assume that MASM/TASM haven't been neither open
> sourced nor actively maintained.
>
> Strictly speaking, OpenWatcom
On 7/7/2022 9:59 AM, C. Masloch wrote:
On at 2022-07-07 09:39 -0700, Ralf Quint wrote:
Similar with NASM, where for some weird reasons, they made the
assembler case-sensitive, which I would consider utter nonsense (also
among my griefs with C(++)). And it really bites you if you are
trying to
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 12:50 PM Aitor Santamaría wrote:
>
> I haven't been following much of what happens with the different assemblers
> these days, but my idea is
> that the same thing as with C or Pascal happens: as much as TASM or MASM are
> nice products, there
> are hardly open source
Hello,
I haven't been following much of what happens with the different assemblers
these days, but my idea is that the same thing as with C or Pascal happens:
as much as TASM or MASM are nice products, there are hardly open source
actively maintained products that are compatible with them, and hen
On at 2022-07-07 09:39 -0700, Ralf Quint wrote:
Similar with NASM, where for some weird reasons, they made the assembler
case-sensitive, which I would consider utter nonsense (also among my
griefs with C(++)). And it really bites you if you are trying to link
assembler modules with other progra
On 7/2/2022 10:37 AM, Travis Siegel wrote:
Masm, Tasm, and others all have their own syntax which confuses me
more than helping.
Well, that is not quite correct. And it would be obvious if you did x86
assembler in the early '80s. MASM (and basically TASM (as in Borland
Turbo Assembler)) is
> What i don't like about A86 is that allows you to do stuff that is
> actually "forbidden".
>
> For instance, from what i remember, A86 allows you to do something
> like:
>
> MOV ES, B800h
>
> This is absolutely not supported by the CPU, and you need to use a
> general purpose register to move a v
12 matches
Mail list logo
