В ответ на сообщение товарища Michael B. Brutman,
датированное 5-Oct-2011 19:39:
> On 10/5/2011 7:27 PM, Alain Mouette wrote:
> > I had problems with networking in dos for a few users, a short time
> > ago. After a lot of headache, I discovered that those were
> > conections via ADSL that used PP
On 05 Oct 2011 Alain Mouette said:
>I had problems with networking in dos for a few users, a short time ago.
>After a lot of headache, I discovered that those were conections via
>ADSL that used PPPoE, which has a 28 bytes overhead.
Would you please tell how they implement this (ADSL in DOS)
Em 05-10-2011 21:39, Michael B. Brutman escreveu:
> On 10/5/2011 7:27 PM, Alain Mouette wrote:
>> So now I use
>> MTU=1472
>> and I had no more problems ever since. I recommend to anyone, use 1472
>> to avoid problems.
> Ah, interesting! I should put that tip in the user notes.
>
> I set a
On 10/5/2011 7:27 PM, Alain Mouette wrote:
> I had problems with networking in dos for a few users, a short time ago.
> After a lot of headache, I discovered that those were conections via
> ADSL that used PPPoE, which has a 28 bytes overhead.
>
> So now I use
> MTU=1472
> and I had no more pro
I had problems with networking in dos for a few users, a short time ago.
After a lot of headache, I discovered that those were conections via
ADSL that used PPPoE, which has a 28 bytes overhead.
So now I use
MTU=1472
and I had no more problems ever since. I recommend to anyone, use 1472
to a
Excellent, and you are welcome! I am glad it is working this time
around - I get embarrassed when I let broken code out. Some questions:
For best performance the following should be set in the mTCP config file:
MTU 1500
FTPSRV_FILEBUFFER_SIZE 16
FTPSRV_TCPBUFFER_SIZE 16
FT
Thanks for this nice DOS FTP server!
I installed it under FreeDOS 1.0 in VirtualBox 4.1.4 (32 MB RAM) and
on a real machine (Compaq Contura Aero 4/33 20MB RAM).
I then compared the performance of mTCP ftpsrv with other DOS
FTP-servers. The competition was: EZ-NOS 2 [1], Datalight sockets ftpd
Re: Tom Ehlert's help, Eduardo Casino replied --
> A big THANKS to you. Optimising the memcpy routines
> was my next objective, so you saved me a lot of fun ;)
Tom's ideas are "ALWAYS good"! Maybe half of my UIDE
drivers has been much hard work, but the other half is
Tom's suggestions in 200
Hi Tom,
A big THANKS to you.
Optimising the memcpy routines was my next objective, so you saved me
a lot of fun ;)
Thanks again for your feedback (and the one you've sent me privately)
and for reviewing the code.
Best,
Eduardo.
--
Hi Eduardo,
sorry; pressed the send key too early ;)
> I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first version of
> VMSMOUNT, an installable file system for DOS that allows access to
> VMware's shared folders as a normal drive letter:
it simply works as advertised
it doesn't leave unuse
Hi Eduardo,
> I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first version of
> VMSMOUNT, an installable file system for DOS that allows access to
> VMware's shared folders as a normal drive letter:
it simply woks as advertised
it doesn't leave unused clutter loaded as TSR
---
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:09 PM, John Ames wrote:
>> From: Rugxulo
>> Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Sound Blaster 16 issues...
>>
>> Are you running latest FreeDOS kernel and HIMEMX + JEMM386?
>> (Somehow I doubt it.) Try upgrading a few of your system files and try
>> again. Else try booti
12 matches
Mail list logo
