- Original Message -
From: "Jack Raats"
Subject: Old system keeps coming back
At this moment I hiring a FreeBSD server running FreeBSD 7.2.
After running cvsup, updating sources and ports, compiling the complete
system, installing kernel and the "new world",
"me too" 's are of little help. Please elaborate on your "exact same", since
each person's perception will be slightly different.
So far I have heard nothing that sounds like a driver issue.
Jack
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Markus Vervier <[EMAIL PROT
OK, I just got access to a machine, am going to install and see if I
can repro this
this afternoon.
Jack
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Markus Vervier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Vogel schrieb:
>>
>> "me too" 's are of little help. Please elabo
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 08:19:46AM +, Josh Paetzel wrote:
>> On Friday 08 August 2008 06:31:24 pm Jack Vogel wrote:
>> > OK, I just got access to a machine, am going to install and see
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Markus Vervier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Vogel wrote:
>>
>> Seems possibly a BIOS thing, if not that bad cable, bad link partner
>> maybe??
>>
>
> I had the problem with all sorts of switches / cables. How can I dump
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Markus Vervier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Vogel wrote:
>>
>> I didn't mean the NIC EEPROM, but the system BIOS, make sure you are
>> running the version that Jeremy said he was, if that matches you might go
>> look
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Markus Vervier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jack Vogel wrote:
>>>
>>> I didn't mean the NIC EEPROM, but the system BIOS, make sure you are
>
e path, or using a set of scripts that get
postinstalled you need to
be ready to make this change.
How can you tell if you have such a device: Simple, use pciconf, there
are only 3 ID's
that are effected: 0x10A7, 0x10A9, and 0x10D6.
If you have questions feel free to email me.
Cheers
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jack. Will the em driver ever support the multiple hardware queues of
> the 82571 or are we just stuck with the standard em driver?
> Has there been any significant change in the em driver itself ?
> I have
d
neither our driver or the Linux driver has a way to bring it back
out of that state.
Until this gets worked out all I can tell you is "keep that cable
IN" :)
Jack
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Markus Vervier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
LOL, sorry to disappoint you but I'm not responsible for fxp, Intel didn't write
it, and i've never touched it :) Now that wouldnt mean that I can't look at it,
but I am very busy right now, so unless there's no alternative I'd rather not.
Jack
On Tue, Sep 23, 20
you the code directly.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
.
Send feedback to me,
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
)
The hardware is a Targa Visonary 2700XP, AMD 2700+ CPU, mem 1 GB
Can anyone help me. I never had this problems before on other systems.
Thanks
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
From: "Ben Kaduk"
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Jack Raats wrote:
Hi,
At this moment I have problems installing FreeBSD 6.4 and FreeBSD 7.0.
After booting from CD the system I get the menu. I have tried all
possible options.
The system starts checking all hardware but fre
y what was on the screen before the "freeze"
for
both 6.4 and 7.0?
How can I do this if the systeem freezes???
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
From: "SDH Admin"
How can I do this if the systeem freezes???
Good old fashioned pen + paper (as long as it's not too long). Never
fails.
Main problem is:
ad0: FreeBSD check1 failed
I googled but didn't find any solution.
Does anyone have a clue where to find
I have not seen a problem like this ever, what is the link partner
of each NIC and if you switch the ports what happens?
We have Nehalem's in the validation lab but I have not had an
excuse to install on one so far, I guess now I do :)
Jack
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Mars G Miro
other engineer in my group had an encounter with one
like yours, I have two managers looking for me, hopefully I can find one.
Jack
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Mars G Miro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we d
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Mars G Miro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Mars G Miro
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> >> Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we don't seem to have any systems
> >> with
> &
I got the same thing. I put only the options I needed into loader.conf
and it booted fine.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:09:52PM -0500, Andrew Lankford wrote:
>> After rebuilding world from 7-stable after cvsup, I can no longer boot.
>> The loade
> >
> > no...@pci0:23:0:0: class=0x02 card=0xa15f8086 chip=0x10c68086
> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
> >vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
> >class = network
> >subclass = ethernet
&
Somehow that error was corrected but just AFTER the release. Its a simple
fix, look at
ixgbe.h in CVS to see it, you just get rid of the "tcp_lro.h" and change it
to
There will be a new code drop soon also.
Jack
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Greg Rivers
> wrote:
> On
is a possibility.
Jack
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:36:16AM -0900, Royce Williams wrote:
> > We have servers with dual 82573 NICs that work well during low-throughput
> activity, but during high-volume activity, they pa
LOL, glad the problem has been resolved, and no thanks, I do not need
to pursue this any further.
I also want to thank Jeremy for his help and data!!
Thanks guys and good evening,
Jack
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Royce Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Royce Willi
r try this.
Best regards,
Jack
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> On two Intel chipset Supermicro boards (X8STi and X8STE-0) using the
> onboard em nics (dmesg info below), I seem to have run into an issue where
> if I boot the box up with the cables unplugged,
Cool, so stable/7 will just need to be updated :) I need to catch up all the
drivers in that stream actually.
Thanks for testing!!
Jack
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 07:29 PM 11/18/2009, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> Hey Mike,
>>
>> Can you c
I will look into this Hiroki, as time goes the older hardware does not
always
get test cycles like one might wish.
Jack
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that network connection of one of my boxes got
> significantly slow just after upg
t was working.
To me this is further data on the need to have a frozen legacy version of
em but the problem is which code to use and how to approach it.
Can you give me more specifics on the box you have this installed on??
Regards,
Jack
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
&
debug, but wanted you to know that I
have reproduced this.
Jack
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> We've run into a snag on this problem. The 82547 is a LOM only interface
> and my validation engineer has only found two old systems that have it,
> and neither o
The 82573, when onboard (LOM) is usually special, it is used by system
management
firmware. Go to the system BIOS and turn off management, see if that
eliminates the
periodic hang.
Jack
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> John Nielsen wrote
> in <1e3c66ea-a6d3-
Hi,
I'm looking for a good manual how to implement ipfw in and with jails.
Google doesn't give anything usefull
Thanks for your time
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
pass tcp from any to $jail2 22,80 in
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Procacci"
To: "Jack Raats"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 6:33 AM
Subject: Re: Jails and IPFW
If you are asking whether the root user of the jail can implement their
own firewall, the
I am incorporating some of Pyun's ideas into my new version, although some
changes I
am unconvinced about... There will always be later :)
Jack
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 03:19 PM 1/7/2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 09:46
No, it hasn't, I need time to look it over and be convinced of what he was
doing.
Jack
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Nick Rogers wrote:
> looks like the patch mentioned in kern/141843 has not been applied to the
> tree?
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Nick Rogers w
issue?
Regards,
Jack
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> No, it hasn't, I need time to look it over and be convinced of what he was
> doing.
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Nick Rogers wrote:
>
>> looks like the patch mentioned
e the hardware offload for that works. With your patch if I disable
TXCSUM
on the interface then it will work... but before your change it works with
that on.
So, am I missing something?
Cheers,
Jack
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:55:00AM -08
Great, if you can get the changes to me quickly I'd like to incorporate
them.
BTW, I have merged your igb changes into my code and its very stable, should
see that checked in for 7.3 shortly.
Thanks for your hard work Pyun!
Jack
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
t uses the OLD way
(ie that it never calls em_setup_vlan_hw_support()) and see if that makes
the issue disappear.
If you have any problems or questions email me directly.
Jack
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Marco van Tol wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:00:35AM -0800, Nick Rogers wrote
No need, I set it up and tried it, and I was right, it does not fail if that
routine is not used. The interesting thing is that the igb driver, which
has the same code, works fine.
In any case, I'm hot on the track of this and hope I can figure it out
today.
Jack
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at
You know, i know absolutely nothing about ALTQ :) This is the first I've
heard
about this problem, you should make sure the maintainer of the driver gets
informed sooner :)
Would be happy to look into it as I have time.
Jack
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Nick Rogers wrote:
> Doe
So apparently this thing needs no special knowledge in the driver, yet
something in
the new code breaks it, can someone explain tersely how the altq app
actually
"pokes" or "hooks up" to the driver? I am not clear about that and I suspect
if I was
this would all be clearer.
es are not set in
the build, OR there is something wrong in the logic of the short circuit
approach in Kip's code.
A question might be if ANY driver that is usinig TX Multiqueue has been
successfully used with ALTQ?
Jack
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Max Laier wrote:
> On Tuesday 0
LOL, and I can answer my own question, I just looked and the ONLY
1Gig drivers using multiqueue are mine, so I guess not eh? :)
J.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Thanks Max, yes, i've done some digging myself and now see how things
> work, the rubber meets the
.
Right now the inserted code looks solid enough to me, so somehow I think
its not being defined.
Jack
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:41:01PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > LOL, and I can answer my own question, I just looked and the ONLY
Just teseted, and at least in the kernel build I'm doing its definitely
defining
that code on, hit my syntax error rebuilding em.
Jack
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> It should never get to the drbr code, look at net/if_var.h, in the inline
> definition
> o
Yes, my bad, its going to get MFC'd soon... The driver in HEAD
will work on 8 BTW.
Jack
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:47:16AM +0100, Christof Schulze wrote:
> > Hello world,
> >
> > I also have a board with the
Hmmm, not sure what changes are in this, what if you use the 8.0 REL
driver, does it still happen?
Regards,
Jack
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>> I have a fairly recent 8-stable machine running under VMWare ESXi 3.5
>> (a
The failure to "setup receive structures" means it did not have sufficient
mbufs
to setup the RX ring and buffer structs. Not sure why this results in a
lockup,
but try and increase kern.ipc.nmbclusters.
Let me know what happens,
Jack
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Willem Jan With
ffect,
Jack
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Nick Rogers wrote:
> I'm still having a problem where an em(4) interface mysteriously "hangs"
> and
> mostly stops sending/receiving packets until I issue an ifconfig emX down
> followed by an ifconfig emX up, which fixe
I need a bit more context Nick. Is this a card that has been non-problematic
on older releases and just showed a problem with 8.0 REL?
Regards,
Jack
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Jack Vogel (jfvo...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Its using MSI? Given that its
Hi,
I have an Exchange ActiveSync account and I would like to get this mail on my
freebsd 7.3-stable server.
I donn't haven an imap or pop account, only the information of the activesync
account.
Can anyone give me a clue how to achieve this?
Thanks for your time!
Jack
Brandon,
Did the checkin of yesterday afternoon resolve the problem of the win7
systems in
VirtualBox? I will continue to look at this today.
Jack
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >
> > OK, some more d
he kernel 64 or 32 bit?
Jack
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 09:12 AM 4/8/2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack,
>>I looks like the latest MFC to RELENG_8 for the em driver has
>> caused a regression. The box is not doing much as its a de
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Mike, I noticed this connection is only 100Mb, that isn't accidental?
> And,
> > is it possible for
> > you to check a connection at 1Gb and see
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Brandon Gooch <
> jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010
Both of you try something for me:
Assuming you are using the latest code in HEAD, at line 4042 please make
this insert:
/* Strip the CRC */
rctl |= E1000_RCTL_SECRC;
And try things again, I think this will solve at least the DHCP thing. I
hope.
Jack
On Thu
^^
>
> Try this patch. It should fix the issue. It seems Jack forgot to
> strip CRC bytes as old em(4) didn't strip it, probably to
> workaround silicon bug of old em(4) controllers.
>
> It seems there are also TX
^^
>
> Try this patch. It should fix the issue. It seems Jack forgot to
> strip CRC bytes as old em(4) didn't strip it, probably to
> workaround silicon bug of old em(4) controllers.
>
>
Actually it did strip it, but its buried in the c
You know, I'm wondering if the so-called ALTQ fix, which makes the TX
start always queue is causing the problem on that side?
Jack
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 08, 2
Bigger question is will it fix Brandon's VirtualBox issue??
Jack
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 02:17 PM 4/8/2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
> Try this patch. It should fix the issue. It seems Jack forgot to
>> strip CRC bytes as old em(4) didn
Try the code I just checked in, it puts in the CRC stripping, but also
tweaks the
TX code, this may resolve the watchdogs. Let me know.
Cheers,
Jack
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:27:10AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > You
Only one device support by em does multiqueue right now, and that is
Hartwell, 82574.
Jack
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 04:56 PM 4/8/2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:31:18PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> > At 02
Ah, ok, let me play around with it a bit, perhaps I'll make it definable,
of course if there is no positive benefit from using it it would seem silly
to leave it around :)
Will look at your patch changes and that issue tomorrow. Thanks
for your efforts!
Jack
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 09:17:07AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 07:07 PM 4/8/2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > >On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:06:09PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > >> Only one device support b
Oh, didn't realize you were running the lem code :) Will make the changes
shortly,
thanks for your debugging efforts.
Jack
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:40:03 +0300 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> MG> Hi,
>
> MG> Tod
e recent e1000/em
> > > changes. Because of this, I've avoided building kernel on all of my
> > > systems, and would recommend others avoid doing the same until these
> > > problems can get worked out.
> > >
> > > Jack, can you shed some light on what's go
Glad things are better. On the Hartwell, the 0x10D3 adapter, what is the
problem you are seeing?
I just did an MFC, would ask that you try that code, see if it changes
anything.
Regards,
Jack
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
>
Why are you using ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS? And is this LOR happening on STABLE or
CURRENT?
Jack
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:02 (localtime):
>
> Glad things are better. On the Hartw
No objection, I just wondered if it could somehow be involved in the problem
you are seeing.
What do you use that actually uses them?
Jack
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:53 (localtime):
've seen I inadvertently reintroduced it in the newest code.
I've agreed to go back to MAGIC only in the current code, but am in the
middle of some
new development and havent yet got to it but will shortly.
Jack
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2
Thanks Harald,
Have already been made aware of this, its due to the broadcast WOL being
enabled, I will be
fixing the problem shortly. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Cheers,
Jack
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> On 16.04.2
Oppps, forgot about the lem case, sorry, and here I made lem so i wouldnt
have to touch that code, lol :)
As for WOL not working at all, that's something I'll have to check on.
Jack
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> Ja
DUH, forgot to add the file, lol. Fix coming shortly
Jack
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:40:23PM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> > ===> em (depend)
> > @ -> /src/sys
> > machine -> /src/sys/am
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.366/0.790/1.339/0.290 ms
>
> (maybe I should have used HZ=2000 to keep it below 0.6ms ;-)
>
> > Also, if you dont need IPV6, use FAST_IPSEC. It does not need
> > mpsafe. If you do need IPSEC and IPV6, 7.0R got rid of that restriction
nd George have boards that use the 82563EB. jv@ will have to
> > help with this one. I wonder if it's a BIOS bug of some kind, where
> > something on the NIC isn't getting reset by the BIOS on a soft boot...
> >
>
> Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. I can test patches during
> evening hours when this server is mostly idle.
>
> Ben
>
>
There is a fix in the shared code that is checked into CURRENT that
addresses this,
however, yesterday evening a problem cropped up that might still be unfixed with
that code, I'm looking into that today...
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
exact dates for availability but they should be soon.
As ever, issues and bugs should be sent to me. Cheers everyone!
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any ma
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:14:32AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>
> > I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
> > messages.
> >
> > The igb dr
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:14:32AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
0505 BIOS. I
> updated to the 1001 version.
>
> Jonathan Stewart
Excellent, glad to hear that it now works, and thanks the most for
getting back on this Jonathan, always good for future searching
to have closure :)
Jack
___
freebsd-sta
;
>
> Any ideas?
There was a problem in the watchdog path, I don't recall if
it was checked in to STABLE, I will check after the weekend.
But, there is also the question of why you are in the watchdog
path in the first place.
Jack
___
freebs
test group has done some basic testing of this and it is working great.
But we wanted to give any vlan users a chance to see, ask questions, or
whatever before its committed.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
On 6/10/08, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a small patch that Sam came up with for me, it will allow
> drivers to know
> when a vlan attaches.
>
> It is transparent to any code that doesn't want to change, but this
> will allow my
> drivers to f
/httpd.pid overwritten --
Unclean shutdown of previous Apache run?
After hashing out
#LoadModule unique_id_module libexec/apache/mod_unique_id.so
#AddModule mod_unique_id.c
Apache starts normally
Can anyone explain this?
Jack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - GPGrelay
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:51:53AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > This is a small patch that Sam came up with for me, it will allow
> > drivers to know
> > when a vlan attaches.
> >
&
Yes, I guess the time has arrived to add igb into GENERIC, I
would add into your kernel config now, I will add into the tree
at my next opportunity.
As for that failure on igb1, try building in the kernel and see
if that still happens, that one I have not seen.
Cheers,
Jack
On Mon, Jul 7
Just guessing, did someone change conf/files maybe??
Jack
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> As of today, this afternoon, I see the following:
>
> linking kernel.debug
> e1000_api.o(.text+0xad9): In function `e1000_setup_init_f
Oh, so the problem is if igb alone is defined?
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:04 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:53:16 -0700,
> Jack Vogel wrote:
>>
>> Just guessing, did someone change conf/files maybe??
>>
>
> If you build a STABLE ker
OK, will put on my todo list :)
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:07:22 -0700,
> Jack Vogel wrote:
>>
>> Oh, so the problem is if igb alone is defined?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
> Best,
> George
>
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I would like to add the zyd device to FreeBSD.
The zyd driver allready is in FreeBSD 7.0.
Which steps do I have to take to add the zyd device to FreeBSD?
Jack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959
If the poster gives me EXACT hardware list I will see about repro'ing the
problem inhouse. We do not do much of anything with laptops but I
will see. Oh and a pciconf would help too.
Jack
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:24:53 -0700
> "Jack Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If the poster gives me EXACT hardware list I will see about repro'ing the
>> problem inhouse.
that the LED is blinking means you
have an autoneg failure, so again, its your switch not the NIC.
Let me guess, you have some 100Mb home router and you are trying
to plug a gig nic into it and forcing the speed maybe?
I asked for a hardware list, now that includes the switch.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ed it, but get it, run it, and then
see if your problem goes away.
Jack
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:51:38 +0200
> schrieb Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I'm trying some other things here. Before
Thanks for the pointer Royce, and yes that's the issue, and if you want
to boot Linux and use that instead of DOS then more power to you.
Cheers,
Jack
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Royce Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Vogel wrote, on 8/4/2008 9:18 AM:
>> T
Right, the Linux driver implemented the ability to write as well as read
the eeprom, I've always been hesitant to add that. But for some it
will be easier to boot Linux and run the script.
Thanks for adding the URL Royce.
Jack
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Royce Williams <[EMAIL P
pass
traffic, and then unhook cable, see if link goes down, reconnect
and it should go up.
Oh, and exactly what kernel, and driver revision are you using.
Jack
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:35:21 -0800
> Royce Williams
I've noticed for Dells, you have to set the performance setting to
"Custom" and OS Control to be able to change the EST.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 7:12 PM Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> We use leased server Dell PowerEdge R640 with latest firmware (BIOS/UEFI)
> that does not export ACPI _PSS ta
I'm also having the same exact issues across several systems on
13-BETA3 and 14-CURRENT as of last week.
I recently upgraded everything to the latest 13-STABLE and 14-CURRENT
but uptime is only a day or so and not sure if it's still a problem.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:07 PM Florian Smeets via
nvironment.
Widely spread, uh ya, but not virtualized, so tell me more about the
environment.
Jack
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm playing with releng_9_1 on a neat intel server, pre-production.
> Since E
101 - 200 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
