rchitecture.
>
> --
> -Chuck
>
Hmm so using "-O2" is bad in 5.4 and it should be "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing"?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 25/10/05, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 08:57:27PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> > On 22/10/05, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > > > My make.conf contains (fbsd-5.4)
> >
r/obj
# chflags -R noschg *
# rm -rf *
# cd /usr/src
# make buildworld
# cd /usr/src
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
# make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
# shutdown now
# fsck -p
# mount -u /
# mount -a -t ufs
# swapon -a
# cd /usr/src
# make installworld
# shutdown -r now
Done.
ardware/bios or operating system
problem.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
table
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>>
>
> hello again,
>
> i've just cvsuped to 6.0-stable and recompiled & reinstalled world &
> kernel and guess what ?!? -- loader is still broken!!!
> this time my machine is not
Thats a simple answer your HD is failing purchase a new one backup and
reinstall freebsd on new drive
> Hi all!
>
> Once i installed ``old'' FreeBSD 5.0-STABLE with UFS file system.
> It had been working fine for a while without any problems but sometime
> later; it showed error messages on ttyv0;
You can umount any fs as long as it is not /usr or / boot into single user
mode and then use fdisk.
> On Tuesday 17 January 2006 09:11, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> So, does anyone know the trick to be used to modify
>> the slices on a mounted disk ? Or do i have to boot
>> from a different media ?
>
>
,
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Why would you want to do that ?
> Just curious if I should even bother trying to compile 4.11's kernel
> under Release 6.
>
> Just tried and couldn't successfully 'config MYKERNEL_CONF':
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] config MIRALINK.serial_console
> config: ../compile/MIRALINK.serial_console: No such file
Tell you how to unsubscribe
you need to send a email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Please take off this mailing list at once!!! I dunno what this is all
> about but i do not wish to receive any more mails, hundreds of them every
> day, that makes no sense whatsoever to me.
>
> T
gt;
> B
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
--
Chris Jackson
Network Adminstrator
class.com
"A man, a plan, a canal, panama."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
connected friends, an encrypted tunnel to their network
could be a handy thing..
chris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
while upgrading to 4.0-stable i typed "make buildworld"
and after a half hour or so got this error:
install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444
/usr/src/gnu/lib/libgmp/../../../contrib/libgmp/gmp.h /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include
cd /usr/src/secure/lib/libdes; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make before
First off, raidz2 and raidz1 with copies=2 are not the same thing.
raidz2 will give you two copies of parity instead of just one. It also
guarantees that this parity is on different drives. You can sustain 2 drive
failures without data loss.
raidz1 with copies=2 will give you two copies of al
essage-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Damien Fleuriot
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:55 PM
To: Chris Forgeron
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ZFS - moving from a zraid1 to zraid2 pool with 1.5tb disks
Well actually.
4 gig of memory for the cost of a 60 gig
SSD, and it will trounce the SSD for speed.
I'd put your SSD to L2ARC (cache).
-Original Message-
From: Damien Fleuriot [mailto:m...@my.gd]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:20 AM
To: Artem Belevich
Cc: Chris Forgeron; freebsd-stable@fre
>> On 6 January 2011 22:26, Chris Forgeron wrote:
>> > You know, these days I'm not as happy with SSD's for ZIL. I may blog about
>> > some of the speed results I've been getting over the last 6mo-1yr that
>> > I've been running them with Z
asking if the messages I'm receiving are related to the
corrections your patch provides. Or should I keep looking for the answer
for the messages I am seeing.
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
> ___
> freebsd-stabl
Hello Jeremy, and thank you for your reply.
On Tue, January 11, 2011 12:17 am, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:40:37PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
>
>> Greetings, and thank you for the "heads up".
>> On Mon, January 10, 2011 2:22 pm, Rick Macklem wrote:
&g
Interesting, I was just testing Solaris 11 Express's ability to handle a pulled
drive today. It handles it quite well. However, my Areca 1880 drive (arcmsr0)
crashes when you reinsert the drive.. but that's another topic, and an issue
for Areca tech support..
..back to the point:
Solaris runs
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Boris Kochergin
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:51 PM
To: Chris Forgeron
Cc: freebsd-stable
Subject: Re: ZFS - hot spares : automatic or not?
>After a cursory glance at their fault-management infrastructure, I
>noticed that it
d:
~4.5 seconds
Apologies for the extra noise on the list, but I do a tremendous amount
of editing with sed(1) on almost a daily basis. It's a _fantastic_
tool, that saves me _zillions_ of hours. So I'm afraid I become a bit
defensive when hearing anyone defame it - it's been like
On Thu, January 13, 2011 11:45 am, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 13 Jan 2011, at 6:10, Chris H wrote:
>
>> FWIW On a hunch, I just performed an experimentwith sed(1)
>> against gsed on 50,000 html documents. My mission; to replace all instances
>> of:
>>
>>
On Fri, January 14, 2011 12:01 am, Chris H wrote:
>
> On Thu, January 13, 2011 11:45 am, Alban Hertroys wrote:
>
>> On 13 Jan 2011, at 6:10, Chris H wrote:
>>
>>
>>> FWIW On a hunch, I just performed an experimentwith sed(1)
>>> against gsed on 50,0
ves
In fact, that's the _only_ reason I haven't already switched to unbound.
--Chris
>
>
> --
> Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.freenix.fr
> In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/
>
nothing.
Research on forums related to issues on nVidia & ATI video cards have many
threads that ultimately point at issues using hald(8).
Bottom line (for me anyway) has been that if I disable hald(8), I have nearly
no (video related) issues. Th
On Mon, February 14, 2011 10:21 am, Ted Faber wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:52:43PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
>
>> I noticed a potential issue in the output of your attached Xorg.conf.
>>
>
> Can you tell me what looked fishy? I'm happy to poke it it.
>
>
On Mon, February 14, 2011 2:35 pm, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Chris H wrote:
>
>
>> I'm /not/ on a GENERIC kernel, but here are some relevant pieces from
>> my setup that might help; rc.conf(5) hald_enable="NO" dbus_enable="YES"
>
"crap shoot" when it comes to setting up Xorg(1). While Xorg(1) -configure
is intended to get a "functional" version of X(7) up, and running. Hardware,
is not Hardware, is not Hardware. So a lot of "trial, and error" /will/ be
required to obtain an "optimal"
On Tue, February 15, 2011 4:05 pm, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Chris H wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, February 15, 2011 12:21 pm, Warren Block wrote:
>>
>>> So many people were using AEI that I decided to write an article about
>>> it: http://www
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Chris H wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, February 16, 2011 1:34 am, Tom Evans wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Chris H wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, the box I'm writing this message from is running a
>>>> G
s well as available from:
http://www.freebsd.org/docs.html
It's hard to imagine needing anything else -- even if it's ones very first time.
--Chris
>
> I'm finding it much more difficult to learn BSD than it was to learn Linux.
> However, I'm sure it will be worth it, as BSD is l
On Fri, April 1, 2011 6:29 am, Marko Lerota wrote:
> George Kontostanos writes:
>
>
>> Not with the same behavior and it depends on what your server is doing at
>> the time of the power interruption.
>
> It was in stage of booting after first power loss.
>
>
>> but ZFS is not the solution to your
On Fri, April 1, 2011 10:38 am, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Chris H wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, April 1, 2011 6:29 am, Marko Lerota wrote:
>>
>>> I read that ZFS don't need fsck because the files are always consistent
>>>
&g
cable(s), then what is left? The
card.
--
> Chris Brennan
> --
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com
, I would change
cards. There is a slim chance it could also be a driver issue.
--
> Chris Brennan
> --
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> http://xkcd.com/84
x27;ve tried the obvious, time to move up the chain.
I'm sorry you don't happen to like that but there is no need to be rude
about it.
--
> Chris Brennan
> --
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >&g
g you.
This will be my last post on this topic. George you are rude and I know
I will not be offering any more suggestions for you. I foresee few
others willing to help you now as well. Jeremy has willingly given you a
great amount of detail to work with and it's up to him to look past your
mment and manpage improvememts.
>
Hi Perry,
The changes look good, so if there's no response for a few days I'll
commit the changes.
Thanks for rescuing the port :)
Chris
--
Chris Rees | FreeBSD Developer
cr...@freebsd.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees
___
On 25 August 2011 18:54, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 24 August 2011 16:14, wrote:
>>> When the specified or calculated rate exceeds 64KB/sec, the
>>> required sleep interval between 64KB chunks is less than one
>>> second. Since diskcheckd calculates the interval in w
m "as many as script can stuff down the pty at maximum CPU
rate" to "one a second". Thus, if I were fixing this, I would lean
towards "EOF is just a temporary signal" being applied only to
character devices, and/or perhaps having a command-line f
What is your Wiki name?
On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
>>> available. Since this is t
On 4 October 2011 16:35, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The third BETA build of the 9.0
On 4 October 2011 19:36, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>> What is your Wiki name?
>>
> "ArnaudLacombe"
>
> created this morning, with the same email address as the one I'm
> sending this email
server, and there's no way to
> know. Great isn't it?
>
> If you are syncing directly off of cvsup-master -- shame on you. You
> aren't supposed to do this, and I believe the Handbook or freebsd-hubs
> even has a policy about it being considered in
Just on case anyone's not on ports@:
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Chris Rees"
Date: 8 Oct 2011 10:30
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP]: ports feature freeze starts soon
To: "Thomas Mueller"
Cc: , "Erwin Lansing"
On 8 October 2011 10:22, Thomas M
oved that I could configure my wifi connection w/o hand-editing the
> config files, so thanks a lot to Nathan for the hard work!
Wifi was the main thing I was pleased with too-- thanks from me.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
ete use case for it.
>
> I finally figured out why my ports aren't updating anymore: when running
portupgrade -a --batch from cron, stdin is /dev/null, and that produces the
gobs of ^D in the output, as well as the script file that portupgrade
creates. What's worse is that the upgrade
y src.conf looks like it's in good order, and the
> other WITHOUT_ options were heeded.
>
You mention a new sysinstall executable, as in it was *definitely*
installed by the installworld and not just left over? Is the mtime the
same as others in that dir?
Chris
__
You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the
point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons.
A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
On 15 Dec 2011 21:25, "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> >> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it
> >> is legitimate to com
Flat 3
> > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
> > JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
> >
>
> Thanks for the info Matthew. I think though that it is best for all to
> first make sure that the servers all update
27; (sysutils/libutempter) failed
(specify -k to force)
>
>
> I installed misc/compat8x, however it informed my that I'd need to add ""
to the kernel conf. When I try to do that, I'm met with this error:
>
> /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/DESKTOPKERN9: unknown
> least x.1.
There's no such odd/even number policy with FreeBSD-- I think you're
thinking of another OS ;)
You're right that x.0 is slightly more experimental in general though
(by its nature, it must be).
Chris
___
freebsd-stabl
On 26 February 2012 11:32, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 26 February 2012 18:16:53 Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 24 February 2012 01:35, Erich Dollansky
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Friday 24 February 2012 01:25:01 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> >
g the problem, sometimes you get a bit more info about what was
> >>> happening at the time of lockup.
> >>>
> >>> -- Ian
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Harry Newton
> >> _
I have a few systems with Intel X520-DA2 PCIe network cards (10 Gig).
The problem I've been running into is with a fresh 9.0-STABLE or 9.0-RELEASE
install. I can't get a LACP connection established over the ix0 and ix1 ports.
It's showing COLLECTING and DISTRIBUTING, but not ACTIVE.
I've notic
de for the laggport do I have these problems.
How can I help Jack (or others) diagnose and test this further?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Forgeron
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 7:01 PM
To: free
eyond not
understanding the software forming the basis of Shorewall, you evidently
also failed to read the Shorewall web site which provides support
resources: http://shorewall.net/support.htm . Please pursue those
resources, as this is very much not the place.
--
Thanks and best regards,
Chr
ere's also
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/usr.bin/unzip/ which AFAIU was
committed in time for 8.2-R.
--
Thanks and best regards,
Chris Nehren
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-st
software and stability (Ubuntu didn't exist at the time, and
the less time I spend using that the better).
--
Thanks and best regards,
Chris Nehren
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ther than directories full of conf files
3) Friendly community; easy to get support from people who really know
what they're doing.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
fall back on.
This is *awesome*. /me removes yet another item from the "reasons to use
Solaris" list. I cannot wait to try this out.
--
Thanks and best regards,
Chris Nehren
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
o all of my actual
work in either the Mac's BSD userland or a FreeBSD machine over ssh.
So, really, this is nothing to do with FreeBSD per se, and I will
consider reevaluating FreeBSD as a desktop when something not X11 comes
along (although I don&#x
ures as long as it can continue to run on the original hardware.
Show me one volunteer Unix OS with a 10+ year support infrastructure.
--
Thanks and best regards,
Chris Nehren
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
h of the stuff I wanted broke on AMD64 after
> downloading tarballs for hours. Not good. Contacted package maintainer and
> received answer: yeah, I know it doesn't work on AMD64.
That is unacceptable. Submit a PR next time you find something like
that-- ports that are broken on an arch sho
ted to pkgng is that it's based on a
C library with a public API that developers can use / abuse. It's not
(AFAIK) officially released yet, but some early work I've been doing
with it has shown it to be useful enough.
--
Thanks and
S does not? I'm not trying to troll here,
but am genuinely curious about ZFS's shortfalls in one of the problem
domains it seeks to address.
--
Thanks and best regards,
Chris Nehren
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
me here. It would be of advantage if the
ports tree would also have tags like the base system itself.
>
Unfortunately this is a massive amount of extra work - we only just keep up
with updates as it is.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
have shot themselfs into the foot!
>
Not reading UPDATING until there are problems is not the fault of the ports
tree; it should be checked every time you update.
Of course, many of us forget, but that still doesn't make it anyone else's
problem when we do!
Chris
levant to ports you're interested in. There are also
systems like gmane which provide an NNTP feed for mailing lists.
Combined with a newsreader with good killfile / scoring features, it
shouldn't be hard to keep up.
--
Thanks and best regards,
Chris Nehren
__
On 2 June 2012 10:42, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02 June 2012 AM 9:14:28 Chris Rees wrote:
>> On Jun 2, 2012 4:04 AM, "Erich Dollansky"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > But I have to mention one disadvantage. The ports are in no way linked to
>
more would be needed. Of course, we have then
a huge number of versions. Would it matter? Give the ports tree the major
version number of the latest release. So, at the moment it would be 10.
Increment then the minor every hour if you want. Just make sure that the
ports tree can be downloaded
On Jun 3, 2012 5:26 AM, "Erich" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 02 June 2012 PM 2:56:01 Chris Nehren wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 14:11:06 -0400 , Paul Mather wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what the solution is for the end user. I know I get
> > > s
ay.
--
Thanks and best regards,
Chris Nehren
pgpnxSxVZLdHX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> port maintainers to write a bit more documentation on the options they
> are providing?
Where are you looking? I updated the Porter's Handbook- is there something
missing?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
BSD's ports becomes again
> a problem. There is no convenient way to downgrade or allow the
> user/admin managing how to deal with the load of updates.
You can't have both. As has been repeatedly explained to you, you
should not expect an easy life with the very latest of softwar
option for every port. At the very least it'd
take quite a lot of time and effort to document all of that. Beyond
this, such explanations would duplicate each port's own documentation.
If you're not familiar with something, you very probably shouldn't be
installing it.
Show me on
do not want any extra work spend here to make this
perfect. I only want a simple way to fall back to a big net which is not
that old from which the user can restart.
>
I and most others will purposely refuse to document this in any official
capaci
;
>
> I think that this states very clearly that there are no tags.
>
No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you
know what you are doing, as several of us have explained more than once.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@
On 6 June 2012 14:12, Erich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06 June 2012 8:48:10 Chris Rees wrote:
>> On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, "Erich" wrote:
>> >
>
>> No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you
>> know what you are doi
s well, like fsck and dd do). It sounds
like something is waiting for input or otherwise wedged, and ^T might
tell us which command and what it's trying to do.
Additionally, the output of ps ax -d (show process trees) would be
helpful. This should also show what mergemaster is waiting on.
--
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:05:24 -0700 , Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> On 06/06/12 21:20, Chris Nehren wrote:
>
> >Have you tried ctrl-t? This will send SIGINFO to the process which
>
> No response to any key except ^z
>
> >Additionally, the output of ps ax -d (show process
eBSD is losing strength
> here, in my opinion.
Er... people always test their commits. Sometimes edge cases will
creep in, such as the libreoffice failure which was due to different
configurations, but to suggest that the commit wasn't tested is quite
frankly insulting-- it built on a clean
On 10 June 2012 11:51, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 06/10/12 12:37, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 10 June 2012 11:12, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
>>> Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:09:09 +0700
>>> schrieb Adam Strohl :
>>>
>>>> I get the feeling people are upd
On 10 June 2012 18:10, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 06/10/12 17:43, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
>> On 06/10/12 09:54, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
>>> Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:37:09 +0100
>>> schrieb Chris Rees:
>>>
>>>> Er... people always test their c
essential for a desktop to work properly
>
> of course the package collection needs then something similar to
portversion,
> but not based on ports tree versions, in order to find available updates
>
> who then wants to customize or learn or who dares, can use the ports tree
You have hit the nail right on the head there, and that is the intention
with pkgng. Please feel free to have a go with it using the beta repos :)
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> confirmed without any warnings.
>
> A good reason to stop using this bloated OS if you ask me and use
> something more respectful to their users base relaying on STABLE for
> stability reasons...
>
New versions of Skype require ALSA. This is at their insistence.
Chris
_
I've been seeing a panic on my FreeBSD/ZFS server (running 9-STABLE
built on 6/28), where the relevant line appears to be:
avl_find() succeeded inside avl_add()
I found a patch pjd committed to trunk (r230454), which apparently was
supposed to be MFC'd a week later, but it doesn't appear to be in
There was a problem with the server. It is updating at this moment and
should be up-to-date quickly.
Regards,
-Chris
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 04:55:15PM +0300, nickolas...@gmail.com wrote:
Is everything OK with cvsup.freebsd.org?
I got message
s to boot 8.1R on Linux KVM with AMD hardware!
I'll patch the system on lon-b not to advertise mca this morning Luke. It'll
be interesting to try again once I've done this to check if it fixes normal
booting without the extra hw.mca_enabled="0" flag.
Best wishes,
Chris.
_
BTW, just passing on that my Dell T710 which would Kernel panic under
8.1-RELEASE randomly between 10 minutes-2 days, no longer does this under
8.1-STABLE. I was running it with 2 of the new Intel 6 core Xeon's - X5660
Under 8.1.-RELEASE FreeBSD didn't recognize the processor, and I guess that'
Note, Warren and I attempted to test this this evening on a 10.04 Ubuntu
box, no crashy-crashy...
-chris
On 10/22/10 16:27, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> Ok I'll try testing that on some box I can reach with both hands.
>
> fyi nagasaki is:
>
> [r...@nagasaki ~]# uname -a
> Fre
; 1) http://sites.google.com/site/tingox/asus_v7-p7h55e
> --
> Regards,
> Torfinn Ingolfsen
Did you try installing using a different computer onto that hard drive?
Is the hardware supported by 7.x
(http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.3R/hardware.html for pointers)
Is there a reason
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Claus Assmann
> wrote:
> I just tried to install 8.2-RC1 (amd64) on one of my machines. It
> has two disks: WDC WD1001FALS-4 and SAMSUNG HD103SJ, both 1TB SATA
> disks. The installer shows them as ad10 and ad8. Both disks are
> already in use and have been "forma
p, followed by
cd /usr/src && make installworld, returned:
"/usr/src/Makefile", line 177: check your date/time:
WTF? Should I simply comment lines 174-178?
Why does make(1) refuse to installworld? My date and time are correct (in sync).
Any insight in
Greetings, and thank you for your reply.
On Thu, December 30, 2010 4:38 pm, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 16:06, Chris H wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>> I've spent the morning grooming a fresh kernel on a freshly installed
>> 8.1 amd64, from the DVD. I cv
BTW, I'm noticing the removal of vfs.zfs.zil_disable as well - It's not listed
as a sysctl when I check vfs.zfs, but I see it's still in the source code;
In usr/src/sys/cddl/ :
# grep -r zil_disable *
cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zil.h.orig:extern int
zil_disable;
cddl/contrib/
l: ch...@acsi.ca
2070 Oxford Street, Suite 100, Halifax NS B3L-2T2
Tel: 902-425-2686 Fax: 902-484-7909
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Forgeron
Sent: December-31-10 6:01 PM
To: freebsd-stable@freebs
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:16 AM, ben paley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using FreeBSD since 3.4 but I've been away for a while. Now I've
> put 8.2 on an old laptop, and everything's lovely except power management
> (I'll get round to that eventually) and the Flash plug in.
>
> I've followed the s
201 - 300 of 1023 matches
Mail list logo
