Hello,
Testing FreeBSD 8.2-RC3 i've seen that documentation with regards to
daily_status_zfs_enable
in periodic.conf(5) is missing. Something like this could be added:
(bool) Set to "YES" if you want to run zpool status -x to check for broken ZFS
pools.
Regards.
Victor.
--
La prueba más fehac
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:38:19PM +0700, Edho P Arief wrote:
> UFS:
>
> >>>create GPT
> # gpart create -s gpt da0
> >>>create partition, with start position 4k-aligned
> # gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -b 1024 -l mydata da0
> >>>default newfs is good enough
> # newfs -U /dev/gpt/mydata
>
>
> correct
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a new geli disk and i'm seeing what looks like a memory
leak.
After initializing the device i've tried to do the dd command from /dev/random
like this one:
dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/da0p1.eli bs=1m
And i can see that wired memory is increasing and never released, usi
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:33:48AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup a new geli disk and i'm seeing what looks like a memory
> leak.
> After initializing the device i've tried to do the dd command from /dev/random
> like this on
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 08:43:45PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 12:17:50 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
> PJD> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:04:09AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >> For me your patch look correct. But the same issue is for read :-). Also,
> to
> >> avoi
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a MBR partition with a BSD slice in it using gpart on
FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE. From the fixit console in the install i try to do
gpart create -s MBR ad0
gpart add -t freebsd ad0
gpart create -s BSD ad0s1
gpart add -t freebsd-ufs ad0s1
gpart set -a active -i 1 ad0
For boot
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:46:01PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > also, how do i know about offsets each partitioning scheme needs? shouldn't
> > GEOM
> > take care of it without user needing to know anything about i
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:05:15PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 24.05.2011 19:09, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:46:01PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> >> On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> >>> also, how do i know a
Hello,
Hastd in it's current form is not usable on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE or in 8-STABLE.
You
can see why in this thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-February/010752.html
You can see the committed fix in:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=219721
But it'
Hello,
I have a MySQL server that even without any query executing is eating a lot of
CPU.
After taking a look at what's happening, seems the problem is that pagedaemon
is eating
a lot of CPU. System is not swapping.
Any ideas on what can i look to know why is pagedaemon eating so much CPU?
I
Hello,
First: Happy new year to everybody!
Last year i had a problem with pagedaemon that i reported here[1] but i had
no replies. The problem went away and now it's back to beat me again.
Seems that mysql creates some bad interactions with pagedaemon and system starts
to get slow for disk acces
Thanks a lot for your fast reply Jeremy!
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 04:59:29AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 01:25:49PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > First: Happy new year to everybody!
> >
> > Last year i had
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:17:11AM -0800, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
>
> Mysql uses more than 20G of RAM. You may want to tune it down a bit so
> that there is a bit of free RAM around.
>
> Page daemon is trying to main
Hello,
I tried freebsd-i18n but no one answered, so i will try better luck here. Sorry
for the people who are subscribed to both lists.
- Forwarded message from Victor Balada Diaz -
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:17:21 +0100
From: Victor Balada Diaz
To: freebsd-i...@freebsd.org
Subject
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:05:13AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:19:09AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > We're having some troubles with AHCI under FreeBSD 8.2 and 8-STABLE. The
> > error is:
> >
> > ahcich0: Timeout on sl
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:16:01AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[..]
>
> Thanks. Both your drives look overall fine, sort-of. I'll outline my
> concern points, and ask for some more info:
>
> * ada0 has 28 CRC errors, while ada1 has 2. These drives have been in
> use for 4688 hours and 4583
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:17:19PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> schrieb Jeremy Chadwick am 14.02.2012 17:50 (localtime):
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Claudius Herder wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have got a quite similar problem with AHCI on FreeBSD 8.2 and it still
> >> p
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:09:58PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:15:27PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:17:19PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > > schrieb Jeremy Chadwick am 14.02.2012 17:50 (localtime):
>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:10:20PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I'm too tired to quite understand (in full) what's wrong with my patch,
> but I think you're referring to situations where someone would have
> kern.cam.ada.X.quirks set in loader.conf?
>
> If so, I believe that same situation woul
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:42:47PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:09:58PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >> I took a stab at this, but I don't feel confident this is the proper
> >> s
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:16:01AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Thanks. Both your drives look overall fine, sort-of. I'll outline my
> concern points, and ask for some more info:
>
> * ada0 has 28 CRC errors, while ada1 has 2. These drives have been in
> use for 4688 hours and 4583 hours (re
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:03:26AM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> Dear All ,
>
> There is a thread
>
> "Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?"
>
>
Hello,
I'm using FreeBSD for most of my tasks and servers and i think it's great, but
this things could be improved:
- Good FUSE support. On
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 04:46:21PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a problem with some host: If I put heavy IO load on that
> system, write errors happen, and then it crashes.
>
> AHCI is enabled.
>
> So I suspect the controller -- has anyone experience with that controller ?
Hello K
Hello,
we've just updated one of our test machines from FreeBSD 7.0 to
FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA 2 using freebsd-update. After upgrading it
we can see on /var/log/messages a lot of errors like this one:
Oct 21 13:17:40 yac kernel: re0: watchdog timeout
Oct 21 13:17:40 yac kernel: re0: link state changed
Hello,
last month i reported a problem with interrupt storms in re(4). You
can find that report here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-October/046075.html
After that, i filled a bug report:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/128287
Remko Lodder (CC'ed) sugges
Hello,
i'm trying FreeBSD 7.1 BETA2 in amd64 and i'm having issues with interrupt
storms. The machine works without problems as long as i don't stress much
the HD. If i have high IO load after a few hours the system starts to have
interrupt storms and never again recovers from them until i restart
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 08:42:10AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> >i'm trying FreeBSD 7.1 BETA2 in amd64 and i'm having issues with interrupt
> >storms. The machine works without problems as long as i don't stress much
> >the HD
Hello,
I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
been trying to narrow the problem so someone more knowledgeable than me
is able to fix it. This mail is an other attempt to ask a question
with rega
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> > with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:58:12AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> >Digging at linux source code i've found that they do some special things
> >for this chipset that i've been unable to find on our code. This is
> >linux
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:28:00PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrot
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:08:40PM +, Oliver Peter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> > with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now F
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:28:00PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:18:00PM +0100, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
> Victor Balada Diaz a écrit :
> >Hello,
> >
> >I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> >with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Also i didn't see any problem with interfaces going up and down,
> > but that usually happen after some hours of uptime, so i'll
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 05:05:59AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Dec-10 10:55:35 +0100, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >And you will not use 64bit DMA even if the chipset supports it.
> >However I have not seen any chipsets supporting this fail, YMMV as
> >usual :)
>
> There
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:57:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > Also i didn't see any problem with interfaces going up an
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:00:56PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:10:45AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:57:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
&g
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:00:56PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >
> > I've reverted r185756 which caused GMII access issues on some
> > controllers. If you are brave enough to try beta code, you c
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:13:09PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:00:56PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > >
> > > I've reverted r185756 which caused GMII access
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:55:35AM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> On 10Dec, 2008, at 10:11 , Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> >
> >Thanks for explaining me what the flags do. I'm not skilled enough
> >to create
> >the DMA quirks but if you could give me some patches i&#
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:02:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> Stopped stress testing this morning. After all the weekend testing
> seems the re(4) problems were fixed. No single interface up/down error.
> netstat -i reports no errors and everything is fine. Thanks a lot!
>
&g
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:57:46PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
> >>Dan Langille wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I'm getting this:
> >>>
> >>>kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling interrupt
> >>>source
> >what is your motherboard brand? I have the same issue
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:22:06PM +0300, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
> >>trouble with onboard re(4) was resolved in -CURRENT and -STABLE, but
> >>storms are not bound to ethernet only. storm may appear on any device.
> >>if any device generates enough interrupts rate, storm will arrive.
> >
> >Yes,
Hello,
i have a Sony VAIO VGC LA3[1] that just have USB wireless keyboard.
On the BIOS i can't modify if the legacy mode it's enabled or not
but i think it is enabled.
In the loader everything works fine and i can type without problems
but once i get to sysinstall the keyboard acts like if it had
Hello,
I'm trying to setup my wireless on FreeBSD 9.0-p3 amd64 and i get the following
error:
wpi0: fatal firmware error
pciconf -lv:
wpi0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x10518086 chip=0x42228086 rev=0x02
hdr=0x0
0
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'PRO/Wireless 39
CCing Benjamin Close as he ported wpi(4) driver to FreeBSD.
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup my wireless on FreeBSD 9.0-p3 amd64 and i get the
> following
> error:
>
> wpi0: fatal firmware error
&
Hello,
We've experienced a weird data "rollback" on our NFS servers.
We have two NFS servers. Both running 8.3-RELEASE-p3. We've
setup HAST for one partition between both of them. To be able
to switch fast we configured gjournal on top of HAST. At the
time there was no UFS+J.
Yesterday one of th
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:22:14PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Since FreeBSD 9.0 we are successfully running on the new CAM-based ATA
> stack, using only some controller drivers of old ata(4) by having
> `options ATA_CAM` enabled in all kernels by default. I have a wish to
> drop no
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 03:02:09PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2013, at 7:04 AM, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:22:14PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Since FreeBSD 9.0 we are successfully ru
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 05:07:20PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 01.04.2013 15:14, schrieb Victor Balada Diaz:
> > Being able to configure quirks from loader.conf for disks AND controllers
> > would be great
> > and is not hard to do. If you want i can do a patch in two w
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:27:04AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 19/08/2013 00:13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > That's really odd. But then, it's a firmware driven NIC, who knows what
> > kind of weird crap is going on under the hood.
>
> Yes, it's a black box. So how do I get in contact with inte
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 12:11:42PM +0300, Michael BlackHeart wrote:
> In a log
>
> Apr 11 10:10:23 diablo kernel: Seq: 17600 swtry: 0 ADDBAW?: 1 DOBAW?: 1
[ lots of trimmed log entries ]
>
> First time I see this and do not know what is it and how to handle it.
> There's no kernel debug symbols
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:43:09AM +0300, Michael BlackHeart wrote:
> Thanks.
> I do really have in kernel
>
> options ATH_DEBUG
> options ATH_DIAGAPI
>
> and I've got D-Link WiFi card with Atheros chip
>
> ath0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x3a7e1186 chip=0x0030168c
>
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:55:32PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2007-May-20 21:38:09 +0200, Victor Balada Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I tried the machdep.adjkerntz trick and didn't work very well.
> >If i'm on 0 irqs per second after changing the value i
Hello,
I have a server with FreeBSD 6.2 that is not generating RTC IRQs.
When the system boots everything it's working fine and I get 128
interrupts per second but after a few hours the system starts
losing RTC interrupts. If I enable powerd it happens much faster
than without it.
I've searched o
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 05:11:23AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2007-May-20 18:26:30 +0200, Victor Balada Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have a server with FreeBSD 6.2 that is not generating RTC IRQs.
> >When the system boots everything it's working fine and I
Hi,
i'm testing FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE (from a few minutes ago) and it
doesn't have a freq level for 2000 mhz, but my cpu is a p4-m at
2000 mhz.
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz (1995.01-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6d8 Stepping = 8
Features=0xafe9fbff
Feat
Hi,
using the "user" keyword in pf rules the system panics. I found
this in the errata page:
(31 Oct 2004) When the user/group rule clauses in pf(4) and ipfw(4)
are used, the loader tunable debug.mpsafenet must be set to 0
(this is 1 by default).
I have mpsafenet disabled so i assume that this s
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:09:01AM +0200, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> Hi,
> using the "user" keyword in pf rules the system panics. I found
> this in the errata page:
>
> (31 Oct 2004) When the user/group rule clauses in pf(4) and ipfw(4)
> are used, the loader tunable
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> It seems that powerd does very little in terms of reducing heat, and
> sacrifices performance while doing so. Am i wrong to assume that
> lowering the cpu's frequency should reduce consumed power, and therefore
> reduce the amount o
61 matches
Mail list logo
