cess but they do not got installed but de-installed, as present some
dependencies are messed up ... :)
so as it is, better grab the original sources and compile your stuff on
your own and stay "far" away from ports
--
João Martins (JoaoBR)
Infomatik Development Team
http://wipserve
I have difficulties transferring data from or to nokia smartphones in mass
storage mode, specially nokia N80 and N95.
The files are coming with missing parts, accessing a photo which s stored ont
the phone is beeing seen cut somewhere in half, mp3 files are transferred but
there are missing pa
I get a problem on several am2 motherboards when an SCSI Adaptor (LSI or
Adaptec) is installed and with 4Gigs of Ram
the problem is easy to repeat, after some minutes compiling world the machine
crashes, sometimes a panic mmap ffs crossrefeerence or something, passes too
fast to look an when t
On Friday 10 October 2008 07:43:07 Dieter wrote:
> > I get a problem on several am2 motherboards when an SCSI Adaptor (LSI
> > or=20 Adaptec) is installed and with 4Gigs of Ram
> >
> > the problem is easy to repeat, after some minutes compiling world the
> > machi= ne=20
> > crashes, sometimes a pa
On Saturday 11 October 2008 07:13:16 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
> >
> > JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same r
>>>
> >>> Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
> >>>>>
> >>>>> JoaoBR <[EMAI
On Sunday 12 October 2008 06:57:11 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:51:18 +0200
>
> Fabian Wenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Jeremy
> >
> > On 11.10.08 18:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > Could the problem be specific to certain firmware revisions on the
> > > cards?
> >
> > S
On Sunday 12 October 2008 14:10:36 Scott Long wrote:
> >> I am using some LSI (mpt driver) ultra4 (U320 scsi) and LSI SAS
> >> controllers in FreeBSD 7.x amd64 with 20G of ram, and Adaptec (aac
> >> driver) with a 5th generation RAID card with 8G of ram, both have no
> >> such corruption problems.
On Monday 13 October 2008 10:50:54 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:35:10 -0200
>
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 October 2008 07:13:16 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > It's a driver problem. If you want to use SCSI then you'
gt;> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
> >>>>
> >>>> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
Hi
constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool, this
corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI
scrub is not able to repair, when comes to touch this files machines reboots,
deleting and restorin also is not possíble, seems I need to delete the files,
umoun
On Friday 17 October 2008 15:49:54 Xin LI wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool, this
> > corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI
> >
> > scrub is not able to repair,
On Friday 17 October 2008 15:39:59 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:30 AM, JoaoBR wrote:
> > constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool,
> > this
> > corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI
>
> Presumably your SATA
On Monday 20 October 2008 11:22:08 you wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:37:40AM -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Friday 17 October 2008 15:39:59 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > > On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:30 AM, JoaoBR wrote:
> > > > constantly I find data corruption on
On Monday 20 October 2008 14:44:50 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi, all--
>
> On Oct 20, 2008, at 6:22 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> [ ...JoaoBR wrote... ]
>
> >> well, hardware seems to be ok and not older than 6 month, also
> >> happens not
> >> only on one
On Monday 20 October 2008 15:03:14 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Hm... I thought we determined earlier in this thread that the OP is
> > not
> > getting the benefits of ZFS checksums because he's not using raidz
> > (only
> > a single disk with a sing
On Monday 27 October 2008 20:03:21 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I had no idea users were blindly uncommenting examples in
well seems you're new in support business then :)
the issue might be the reason why weapons are not delivered with roles in the
chambers ... so developers probably should take ca
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 19:48:56 Matthieu Bollot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently installed FreeBSD 6.3, and I've got a problem with
> synaptics.
> I've installed it, followed the pkg-message :
> hw.psm.synaptics_support=1
>
> It works, dmesg gives :
> psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0
> psm0: [GIANT-LO
On Sunday 10 February 2008 11:24:41 Matthieu Bollot wrote:
> Hi all,
> It seems that the current synaptics driver doesn't work with xorg 1.4,
> but with the patch it isn't necessary for virtual scrolling and "3 tap
> clic" for middle clic.
>
> If somebody else has the problem :
> - apply this patch
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 07:49:42 Holger Kipp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated a system with 12 dc-interfaces to a new hardware
> with 14 em-interfaces. Yes, it is a firewall.
> New System is 6.2-RELEASE-p8.
>
> What I now experience between two internal networks (100MBit/s each)
> is the followi
On Monday 03 March 2008 19:07:38 Mark Andrews wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:30:01PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> > > Is it required to have 'options INET6' even if I'm not using any IPv6
> > > connectivity ?
> >
> > No, not unless you rely on SCTP, which at this time *does* require
> > IN
On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:24:08 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Agreed. But at this stage I can't justify the effort to do anything
> > more than have a very cursory glance it at. What benefit would I
> > derive from setting up an IPv6 network and attempting to experiment
> > with it? My ISP won't s
On Sunday 09 March 2008 20:41:51 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > From: JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 20:19:33 -0300
> >
> > your computer will or better CAN use ipv6 when it is on a ipv6 network
> > and nothing else, ipv6 WILL NOT come eventuall
after trying to mount my zfs pools in single user mode I got the following
message for each:
May 18 09:09:36 gw kernel: ZFS: WARNING: pool 'cache1' could not be loaded as
it was last accessed by another system (host: gw.bb1.matik.com.br hostid:
0xbefb4a0f). See: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-800
On Sunday 18 May 2008 11:11:38 Greg Byshenk wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 09:56:17AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > after trying to mount my zfs pools in single user mode I got the
> > following message for each:
> >
> > May 18 09:09:36 gw kernel: ZFS: WARNING: pool '
On Sunday 18 May 2008 12:39:11 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:20:33PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 May 2008 11:11:38 Greg Byshenk wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 09:56:17AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > > > after trying to mount my zfs p
On Sunday 01 June 2008 09:41:09 JoaoBR wrote:
> Hi
>
> when you need /usr/compat on your sistem (linuxfs) and you have /usr on zfs
> boot fails because mountcritlocal does not find /usr/compat
>
> so I changed the rcorder as you can see in the attached files
>
> also I c
Hi
when you need /usr/compat on your sistem (linuxfs) and you have /usr on zfs
boot fails because mountcritlocal does not find /usr/compat
so I changed the rcorder as you can see in the attached files
also I changed /etc/rc.d/zfs and added /etc/rc.d/zfs_swap in order to make the
actual zfs_swa
Hi
anybody else experience a problem with this SATA controller?
atapci1: port
0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfe02d000-0xfe02dfff irq 21 at device 7.0 on pci0
atapci1: [ITHREAD]
ata2: on atapci1
ata2: [ITHREAD]
ata3: on atapci1
7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STA
On Sunday 18 May 2008 12:39:11 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
...
>>> and if necessary /etc/rc.d/zfs should start hostid or at least set REQUIRE
>>> different and warn
...
>>
>> I've been in the same boat you are, and I was told the same thing. I've
>> documented the situation on my Wiki, and the ne
Hi
kern.cp_time seems is reporting wrong values (most time too high) with Phenom
and amd64 (i386 Ido not know)
but with snmpget I get the correct machine values when consulting
ssCpuRawUser.0 ssCpuRawNice.0 ssCpuRawSystem.0 ssCpuRawInterrupt.0
ssCpuRawIdle.0
kern.cp_time on RELENG6 reports
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 17:17:28 Ivan Voras wrote:
> Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > on a newly built Supermicro with Pentium D 2.8 (Dual core) with SMP
> > kernel I got zillions of 'runtime went backwards' errors, both on i386
> > and amd64 kernels.
> >
> > Upd: on GENERIC/
On Monday 11 June 2007 18:05:59 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if
> >
> >> you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if
On Friday 29 June 2007 16:37:34 Tobias Roth wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> -- snip bind question --
> >>
> >> And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE?
> >
> > There is a tradition of answering basic SA questions on our lists,
> > whether they are directly r
When I tar -xzvf file.tar.gz -C/d the machine freeze completely and instantly
after extracting the first file. I tried different option no chance. No error
msg nothing. I used then gtar on the same file created with tar -c and it
worked.
It is amd64 with smp kernel. The tarball is 2.4G . I d
On Saturday 28 July 2007 04:21:39 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> JoaoBR schrieb:
> > On Friday 27 July 2007 12:31:55 Nate Lawson wrote:
> >> JoaoBR wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>> when I enable powerd with default flags (and any other also) the
> >>> com
On Saturday 28 July 2007 07:10:21 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> JoaoBR schrieb:
> > On Saturday 28 July 2007 04:21:39 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >> JoaoBR schrieb:
> >>> On Friday 27 July 2007 12:31:55 Nate Lawson wrote:
> >>>> JoaoBR wrote:
> &g
On Saturday 28 July 2007 08:40:33 Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 08:33:55AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > my ok msg was too fast, after some time my video starts flickering and
> > stays so and the PC is freezed up, disabling powerd and works stable
&g
On Saturday 28 July 2007 14:47:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:46:15PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > Meanwhile I found a workaround for my system: I had SCHED_ULE configured
> > in my kernel - switching to SCHED_4BSD gets rid of the freezes. Should
> > have thought of th
On Saturday 28 July 2007 10:46:15 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> JoaoBR schrieb:
> > On Saturday 28 July 2007 07:10:21 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >> JoaoBR schrieb:
> >>> On Saturday 28 July 2007 04:21:39 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >>>> JoaoBR schrieb:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 10:46:15 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >>
> >> Good to hear. Unfortunately my Mobo's BIOS is already up-to-date, the
> >> CPU is officially supported and Cool'n'Quiet works dandy in Windows XP
> >> ... =/
> >
> > my ok msg was too fast, after some time my video starts flicker
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:21:02 Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2007-Jul-28 19:03:54 -0300, JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >so using ULE in 7 is ok ? ? ?
>
> Yes.
>
I thought it is SCHED_SMP on 7 ... isn't it? if not forget my joke, I remember
a msg from Roberson sa
On Saturday 28 July 2007 07:10:21 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > but I have better news and seems my first idea was right, the MB is it
> >
> > I found a tech info on the manufactor's support site telling cpu support
> > up to 4600+ and found a bios for newer cpus including my 5000+
> >
> > so I upg
On Monday 06 August 2007 12:54:08 Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On 8/6/07, JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Only to remember the problem only ocurres when loading powerd and seems
> > the freeze happens when cpu freq is upshifting not down.
>
> Try setting:
>
> hint.ac
On Monday 06 August 2007 09:28:35 JoaoBR wrote:
.
>
> I had a chance to test several MBs with the same 6000+, 5000+ and 4600+ cpu
>
> At the end seems that the problem is mb/hardware related since some
> combinations hung even with latest BIOS installed and others not.
>
no
On Thursday 23 August 2007 00:17:56 Ian Smith wrote:
>
> Call me curious, but (assuming that you're tuning for performance, not
> economy, and so will always run these boxes on AC power, not battery):
>
> a) why you think that line in /etc/rc.d/power_profile is 'funny'?
>
well, in first place b
On Thursday 23 August 2007 14:37:57 Ian Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 August 2007 00:17:56 Ian Smith wrote:
> > > Call me curious, but (assuming that you're tuning for performance, not
> > > economy, and so will always
On Thursday 23 August 2007 14:37:57 Ian Smith wrote:
> > so now I did because of your question and it seems the power_profile
> > script has a bug
> >
> > I tries to set hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1
> >
> > but I guess it should be dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest
>
> Ah, ok. Updated in HEAD but not STABLE:
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 23:28:42 LI Xin wrote:
> We (one of the largest ICP company in China and provides some billions
> of free e-mail accounts)
well ... and the server is hosted in Gotham City
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Se
On Monday 29 October 2007 20:25:18 Jason Slack wrote:
> I have an HP Media center PC that has the Viiv 920-D processor with 4GB of
> RAM. I hate Windows, but had to sell my MacBook so my Fiance and I could
> get into a new apartment together.
you really should read manpage of "gmirror deactivate"
On Thursday 20 July 2006 12:42, Sam Leffler wrote:
> The original posting didn't provide any basic info so there's little
> anyone can provide except wild guesses. There are debugging mechanisms
> for tracing what's going on at the net80211 layer and in the driver that
> have been referenced count
if you are using a pci express 1x NIC could you please so kind to confirm
which brand/model is working fine for you?
thank's
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
__
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 06:28, Petr Holub wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> > If you are facing the problem I am thinking about, you have to set in
> > your xorg.conf file something like :
> > option "noaccel" "true"
> > (sorry I do not have it at hand to confirm)
>
> no, it has the same problem with NoAcce
On Sunday 15 October 2006 14:42, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
> > pcm0:
> > *
> > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly.bus_dmamem_alloc
> > failed to align memory properly.cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
> > *
>
> This DMA misal
Hi
I have a remote server running if_bridge with two ath cards
one 11g as hostap
one 11a as adhoc
I have a local server with an ath card as 11a adhoc linking the remote server
all works fine but when I run "ifconfig ath0 list stat" on the *local* server
all stations connected to the remote hos
On Sunday 12 November 2006 17:32, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> i saw the same behavior where tx packets would tend to
> spool up and buffer. here's the output of one second
> where a bunch of spooled up packets were sent alont with
> the previous second and following second and with a note
> on how l
i get an error on recent sources releng_6 when doing make
buildworld from clean 6.1-STABLE install
I compile the same sources from a already releng_6 and it
compiles fine
sed
unctrl.h -e "/@NCURSES_MAJOR@/s%%5%" -e "/@NCURSES_MINOR@/s%%2%"
cc -o
make_keys -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 15:07, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses/ti
>nfo/make_keys.c
>
> > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /usr/src/lib/libncurses.
> > *** Error code 1
>
> I bet the date/time o
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 15:20, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 03:43:32PM -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 December 2006 15:07, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses/ti
> > >nfo/make_keys.c
>
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 09:49, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > What does stuttering mean? Is it similar to sendmail's
> > "greet_pause" feature?
>
> See here:
>
> http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/spamd/mgp00014.html
>
why the spam daemon should introduce an artificial de
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 15:46, Christopher Hilton wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > why the spam daemon should introduce an artificial delay
> > (tarpit) if this can be done already before like Oliver
> > said, it would only eat up and slow down threads between
> > both
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 22:05, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> In the process of investigating performance in another area I happened
> to be measuring sequential cached reads (in a fairly basic manner):
>
> $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/file bs=8k count=10 # create file
> 81920 bytes transferr
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:37, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 December 2006 22:05, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> >> $ dd of=/dev/null if=/tmp/file bs=32k # read it
> >> 81920 bytes transferred in 1.801944 secs (454620117 byte
Hi
seems to be something wrong with the sf driver
I have starfire 64bit cards (adaptec 1 and two port) on amd64 releng_6
the card is probed, recognize correctly the connection but no traffic i/o, arp
either
any idea?
sf0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=40
ether 00:00:d1:a8:3c:f7
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:51, Frank Steinborn wrote:
>
> Tried without polling?
>
Yes, also with ULE and 4BSD, no change
thank's
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.mati
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:42, JoaoBR wrote:
> seems to be something wrong with the sf driver
> I have starfire 64bit cards (adaptec 1 and two port) on amd64 releng_6
>
> the card is probed, recognize correctly the connection but no traffic i/o,
> arp either
>
> any
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:38, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> I was however trying to point out that as your machine is different from
> mine (opteron and ddr*400* as opposed to PIII and pc133), the fact that
> it is faster is not telling us anything about whether releng_6
> performance on cached fil
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:19, JoaoBR wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:42, JoaoBR wrote:
> > seems to be something wrong with the sf driver
> > I have starfire 64bit cards (adaptec 1 and two port) on amd64 releng_6
> >
> > the card is probed, recognize c
On Friday 22 December 2006 09:43, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Friday, 22. December 2006 03:59, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >-5.x was never really for production use, in the same way 3.x never
> > >was.
> >
> > Why do people continue to say this?
>
> Because everybody
On Friday 22 December 2006 10:13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 22/12/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I could be wrong, but I get the impression that this whole EOL issue with
> > 4.x is partly a result of not reminding people when the EOL date for 4.x
> > is every 5 minutes. The result i
On Friday 22 December 2006 02:15, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
> FreeBSD 4.11 can survive a simple burn-in test. FreeBSD 5.X and
> 6.1 can not. Here's what I wrote earlier.
>
burn-in usually is a hardware test and not a software test
> Take a server. Configure for SMP, add quotas within jails an
On Friday 22 December 2006 16:06, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Friday 22 December 2006 08:09 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Pete French <> wrote on Friday, December 22, 2006 2:44 PM:
> > Frankly, I can't follow the argument that 6.x is "unstable". After all,
> > it's named 6-STABLE for a reason. I'd
I need some help here, this is not a single case, I get this on a several
machines, this is releng_6 , recent, but old problem getting ugly
first I get this kind of events in messages, independent if it is client mode
or hostap or adhoc
Dec 28 16:50:53 ap1-cds kernel: ath0: discard oversize fr
rsaving might shut the power down but must return when
necessary - if not - there is a driver problem.
João
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, JoaoBR wrote:
> > I need some help here, this is not a single case, I get this on a several
> > machines, this is releng_6 , recent, but old prob
On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:20, Sam Leffler wrote:
thank you for answering, lots of good points and I will try to answer any of
them
> >
> > I really do not know what this event means (ether type 5e4), for my
> > understandings it is vague in the source, so I am lost here
>
> Seems pretty c
On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:29, Sam Leffler wrote:
>
> See my previous reply to you. Lamont is directing you to look for
> stations in your network operating with power save enabled.
>
even if there are stations with powersaving on we can do anything against it
this is an ISP environment whe
On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:37, Sam Leffler wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > 572 cabq frames transmitted
> > 11 cabq xmit overflowed beacon interval
> >
> >
> > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps mode 11b
>
> So one other thing came to mi
On Sunday 31 December 2006 01:31, Sam Leffler wrote:
> >>> I really do not know what this event means (ether type 5e4), for my
> >>> understandings it is vague in the source, so I am lost here
> >>
> >> Seems pretty clear: it's the type field extracted from the ethernet
> >> header of the oversized
On Sunday 31 December 2006 01:33, Sam Leffler wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:29, Sam Leffler wrote:
> >> See my previous reply to you. Lamont is directing you to look for
> >> stations in your network operating with power save enabled
an ath wl card stops definitely working after showing this messages:
kernel: ath0: discard oversize frame ether type 5e4 flags 3 len 1522 > max
1514
seems this packages are then beeing held in the ath tx buffer, filling it up,
what then depending on the rate or quantity brings the ath card do
On Friday 12 January 2007 17:12, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-Jan-07 18:58:18 -0500, Sten Daniel Srsdal wrote:
> >Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >> I've just noticed an number of unpexected "IP address changed MAC"
> >> messages on one of the hosts in my network. It is connected via a
> >> FreeBSD br
On Thursday 25 January 2007 04:08, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> For purposes of making the subject less true, setting up greylisting
> with an optional tarpit for known baddies can be very effective. See
> Dan Langille's recent Onlamp article[1] or for that matter my tutorial[2]
> for how this is
On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:18, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > all this methods are certainly useless, stay calm ok
>
> I fully sympathize with your need to rant, but in this context most of
> what you say is really quite beside the
On Saturday 27 January 2007 02:16, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-Jan-26 09:24:58 -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
> >like I said, for my understandings firewall implemention for spam fighting
> > is wrong
> >
> >because you reject the message
>
> Except that th
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:10, you wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:58:46AM -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
> > also a point to think about, most complains about spam talk about
> > bandwidth consumption, by asking for resend later you certainly increase
> > bandwidth consumption
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:32, Jim Pingle wrote:
> Roland Smith wrote:
> > Most spammers do not bother to return if they get a resend request.
> > That's the whole point of doing this. So practically it doesn't increase
> > bandwidth consumption.
>
...
> Greylisting is a decent idea, but it see
On Saturday 27 January 2007 13:04, Roland Smith wrote:
>
> That's not a bonus. Think about it. Sending a message twice will cut the
> spammer's mail delivery rate at least in half.
>
nobody cares about this, what counts is the hit rate, more you get delivered
merrier the return, that means more y
On Saturday 27 January 2007 13:23, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
>
> Could this discussion please be continued on the apropriate list which
> is designed for spam - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
lists.freebsd.org Mailing Lists
No such list devnull
could you please provide correct information in order to follow
On Saturday 27 January 2007 13:39, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:04:28PM -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
> > > Greylisting is a decent idea, but it seems to me that it's just another
> > > tool in the ongoing arms race against spammers. It may work for a
> >
On Saturday 27 January 2007 14:19, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> everybody: ENOUGH ALREADY!
> Take this discussion off the -stable list!
are you my boss or something?
go swimming in your fjord, eat some lemmings and cool down man
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e po
On Saturday 27 January 2007 20:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No, he's not your boss. You, on the other hand, are a moron and a
> complete menace to the usefulness of this mailing list. Take your
> whining about whatever it is to some place that wants to hear it and
> leave the FreeBSD-stable lis
On Friday 09 February 2007 20:29, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 01:49:08PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:06:56PM -0500, Kevin Way wrote:
> > > I recently ran into a bug in the jail startup scripts that caused this
> > > command to be executed:
> > >
>
On Saturday 10 February 2007 01:54, Ian Smith wrote:
>
> Secondly, pardon my ignorance, but what does 'NS' refer to here? That
> string / term occurs nowhere else in ifconfig(8).
>
nameserver
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service
On Saturday 10 February 2007 17:08, Spil Oss wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Well, actually I'm proposing a change to the GENERIC kernel and
> make.conf.example to add to the comment that one should add
> WITHOUT_IPV6 to the make.conf if you enable NO_INET6.
>
> That sounds to me like something completely
On Saturday 10 February 2007 23:31, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm afraid I disagree with a few of the points you raise.
>
I think both views have points and none of them is wrong. I accept as it is
but I would prefer having it disabled by default. But perhaps this is valid
only for m
On Monday 12 February 2007 12:26, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "ifconfig nic -alias" is obviously a wired and confusing behaviour
>
> It might be confusing to you. Personally I think that the
> current behaviour isn't t
On Monday 12 February 2007 16:09, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >
> > it is not misleading and it is a perfect term. With alias you add
> > secondary addresses to an interface. Like secondary is probably the
> > better word,
>
> No, not at all. As soon as you use the terms "primary IP
> address" and
On Monday 12 February 2007 16:27, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Setting media options and the like via _aliasesX variables makes no
> sense and you don't appear to be doing it so I'm confused by your
> question. The ifconfig_iface_aliasX syntax exists to add IPv4 addresses
> to an interface. New ipv4_addr
On Monday 12 February 2007 22:37, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:18:54 -0300
>
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe the problem here is that
> >
> > ifconfig_nic="inet IP"
> > ifconfig_nic="ether MAC"
> &
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 04:57, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Kevin Way wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > But you called it "confusing". That's just your personal
> > > perception. It doesn't mean it is confusing to everybody.
> > >
> > If asked what -alias does, would you really reply "it
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
