On Saturday 28 July 2007 14:47:17 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:46:15PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > Meanwhile I found a workaround for my system: I had SCHED_ULE configured > > in my kernel - switching to SCHED_4BSD gets rid of the freezes. Should > > have thought of that sooner, ISTR having problems with powerd and > > SCHED_ULE even on single cpu P4s. > > I see you've now learned a reason why no-one should be using SCHED_ULE > on FreeBSD < 7
so using ULE in 7 is ok ? ? ? you already told once ULE is broken in 6 what is nonsense as probably using ULE in 7 is ... ULE in 6.x is absolutely ok and it runs depending on situation faster than 4BSD with correct kernel and sysctl settings for it and it is perfectly stable, specially with polling + net.isr.enable + net.inet.ip.forwarding + some other tweaks depending on the servers load and several NICs on a router probably up to 4-6MB continuous throughput when then 4BSD gets faster but not so much, small and midsize MySQL seems to be faster with ULE too especially with small r/w packages ULE also seems to be faster on a desktop with SMP and KDE on X2 CPUs and you can feel it -- João A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
