On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 05:51:08AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:20:12AM +0200, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 06:03:27PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The one shortcoming of netw
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Hi,
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 10:08, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
As the subject says, on my 6-stable systems ntpd just sits there and does
nothing. The logs only mention when the daemon gets started or shut
down. It
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
i didn't know what was happening when i dropped to single user
mode i got all these different prompts and i didn't know how
to answer the questions. i have posted information on
experts exchange:
http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Unix/BSD/FreeBSD/Q_224
dhcp lease expires
and the system is idle. I am not currently on the laptop so I can not document
the versions I am using. I built the driver a few days ago and downloaded the
Intel 2100 firmware at that time.
Other than the above it has worked fine for me.
Doug.
On Sat, 20 May 2006, Ulrich
My system works, however the buildkernel process had about 2000 warnings, with
1/2 of those compiling aic7xxx (see below). This was discussed on BSDForums but
as far as I can tell, different compiler options were used; the conclusion was
using -O3 was the problem.
I did a clean install from a 6.1
Unless you have a reason to want to modify the source, why not use the package:
setenv PACKAGEROOT ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org
pkg_add -r xorg
will get you 6.9.0_1 in a few minutes
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
On 6/3/06, Manfred Lotz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
BTW, I'm ru
thanks - I appreciate the feedback
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Doug White wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > My system works, however the buildkernel process had about 2000
> > warnings, with 1/2 of those compiling aic7xxx (see below). This was
> > discu
<:(
Damn, however many years and people still point out cool stuff that I
never knew about. I guess thats why I am having so much fun,
thanks :)
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Brian Dean wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 12:30:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure what you mean. If
In trying to update KDE on a system, I wanted to use twm. twm has a
default configuration file, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/twm/system.twmrc which
defines a default menu. I propose the following change be made.
87a88
> "Xterm" !"xterm &"
With this change twm may be used as shipped.
_
D
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Robert Watson wrote:
> The theory goes that there are a number of TCP improvements, in particular
> a bugfix involving the newreno algorithm, that should address this
> specific problem. Once our first release candidate comes out, we'd really
> appreciate it if you had the
I have sound working on 4.4 and 4.3 but never got KDE 2.1.2 to work. After
fishing around a bit I decided to use XMMS YMMV.
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Tim Kellers wrote:
>
> After doing battle with a Toshiba 4010CDS --now it dual boots into Win98
> and 4.5 Pre-Release, I'm at a loss to make the sound
25 15:46 /dev/acd1c
>
> Note the major (117) and minor (0) mode of acd0?. If yours does not
> match, that is likely your problem.
Yes, this has been done and that is how they look.
Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Doug
__
Do You Yah
If I do a "boot -verbose" at the ok prompt when booting, the cdrom is
detected and works fine! (And I do not get the ATA identify retries
exceeded error).
If I do not boot with -verbose, the cdrom does not work.
What gives?
Thanks for any and all i
The answer was:
cd /usr/share
mv mk mk.old
ln -s /usr/src/share/mk/ mk
It would seem to me that this is either a build problem or might at least
rate a line in UPDATING. Or perhaps buildworld use /usr/src/share/mk
rather than the one that won't work?. A diff showed major work on mk.
I assume th
Well $%^& - I spoke too soon. I thought I had past the problem area. It
seems ncurses is used in lots of places. I am out of ideas. Same error
same place different ../share/mk - sigh
I am gonna read a good book for the rest of the evening.
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The error
Great idea - thanks. Those directories should be fine access-wise.
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Barney Wolff wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 11:48:17PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I appears there may be a spot in the buildworld where includes from the current
> > system are being used. The module
e up reliably. I think I'm going
to take what I can get though at this point. I'll re-enter the
approx. 1000 users, get mail running again, and then worry about
trying to recover the spooled messages that some of these people have
let sit all summer.
Thanks to all who made suggestions.
en the fixes are
stable enough they are backported to -stable, so before the next release
you should see big improvement.
> or whether I've done something wrong.
Nope. In fact your fix of using tcp transport is the correct one.
Good luck,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
//www.daddylonglegs.com/arp.patch | patch -d /usr/src
You probably want to send this in as a PR as well. Thank you for
your diligence in hunting this one down.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four y
://home.san.rr.com/freebsd/make-upgrade.html.
Good luck,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
use the 2.2 branch
Changing to a different version of NTP in the 2.2 branch would
violate a lot of freebsd development guidelines. What you want to do is
upgrade to 3.2-Stable then run the verion of [x]ntpd that suits your
fancy. They should all compile right out of the box.
Good luck,
before rebooting. If so, take a look at the make world tutorial on
the web page.
Good luck,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> "Nawfal M. Rouyan" wrote:
>
> I used mergemaster to update /etc.
Good man. :)
> Below is the content of
> /etc/manpath.config
> OPTIONAL_MANPATH/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00503/man
Try commenting this one out, then report your resu
Usually I'd wait longer for a response from Sheldon, but since we're so
close to the release
Doug
Original Message
Subject: inetd -l doesn't (seem to) log without -wW
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 11:12:00 -0700
From: Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Org
not sure where it's generated from
/etc/exports
FYI Peter, similar work needs to be done in -Current, but since we're so
close to the release I thought I'd point out -Stable in particular.
HTH,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
The kerberos dependencies were an error on Jordan's part during the
cutting of the release that lasted all of 9 hours, then was subsequently
fixed. If you're still having trouble, download a new copy and reinstall.
If not, congratulations. :)
Good luck,
Doug
Adam Szilves
Alex Prohorenko wrote:
>
> Greetings!
>
> I've one question. Did anyone already solved problem with /usr/bin/passwd,
> which but default requires kerberos libs?
Yes, the fixed version is already available on the ftp site.
Good luck,
Doug
To Unsubscribe:
rrent behavior that were offered to you in -hackers, and you
apparently never even looked at login.conf which does allow you to limit
the number of processes and number of files per process on a per user
basis.
Now please drop this ridiculous thread.
Thanks,
Doug
> On Tue, 21 Sep 1
efforts to help in this fashion will not be appreciated.
Good luck,
Doug
--
"Stop it, I'm gettin' misty."
- Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
have a subscription I'm eager
for new toys. :)
Doug
--
"Stop it, I'm gettin' misty."
- Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
It's generally better to post a description of your problem, rather than
copy and pasting command line examples. What makes perfect sense to you
may (or even probably does) not make sense to others. :)
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothi
dump to shell
on boot during rc processing. That's a *showstopper*.
The canonical answer to this is to either mount them by IP, or to put
the appropriate name in /etc/hosts. Depending on DNS for NFS mounts is
not recommended.
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't cha
e
second half of the configuration.
I'm happy to review patches. :)
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours
On 01/25/2011 12:28, Kostik Belousov wrote:
No, my use for rc.early is different. I use it to load modules
before filesystems are mounted.
Ok, I'll bite ... what is deficient about doing this in /boot/loader.conf?
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothi
as the
| official 9.6.3 as of a commit done by Doug Barton only a few hours ago:
|
| http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/contrib/bind9/
| http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/contrib/bind9/README
The 9.6.3 update was in ports the same day it was released, and is now
in HEAD and RELENG_8.
elpless.
Did you update /etc after updating the binaries, or is this the first
reboot after freebsd-update installs the new kernel?
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and dept
Ok, likely you can bypass the problem by hitting Ctrl-C.
Once you get kernel and userland updated make sure that you get /etc/
updated as well and you should be fine.
hth,
Doug
On 02/16/2011 23:24, Ken Chen wrote:
It's first reboot with 8.1 kernel.
nextboot -k GENERIC
shutdown -
with that route.
Also fixed quite a few issues for us as well with services not reporting
properly. Definitely something that should be considered as part of core
I've already said that I plan to commit this once the releases are done. :)
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn&
this
is not the right way to solve the problem. If I misunderstand, I apologize.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the ri
the common case (starting the services when the system
starts) it shouldn't be difficult to find a port that is open on all 4.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience
rbitrarily old existing installations.
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) htt
se the --index-only --packages-only options and it'll
work just fine. You'll want to read the man page before getting started.
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, an
ese two FreeBSD releases.
I'm glad to hear that Miroslav was able to make it work. I looked at the
code and it's pretty simple, so I'm not sure why it would fail.
Hilko, if you can add -x to the end of the #!/bin/sh line in
/usr/sbin/service it might give you more of an idea of wh
2002, but did not keep up
with the improvements that NetBSD made to it. I recently found time to
catch up with the work that they've done, and the change to the behavior
of readlink seemed like a useful one so I brought it over. hopefully it
won't cause too many more problems. :)
saved in
/usr/ports/packages/portmaster-download.
It sounds like your best best would be to have an up to date ports tree,
and use the -P option to install packages whenever they are available.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin'
On 03/10/2011 09:31, Mark Felder wrote:
Hrm, strange that a nice keyboard like that comes as USB only.
It's not _that_ strange. PS/2 doesn't allow for safe hot-plugging, USB
does. And very few typists are going to exceed the keyrate of USB.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin
rack down network traffic from "random" ports that would
prefer that doing so not be made harder by having the same service on
the same host using 4 different ports.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
--
that, btw. But I'm not opposed
to the idea if it proves to be necessary (which I seriously doubt).
My only concern with the "same port# patch" is that it is more complex
and, therefore, somewhat riskier w.r.t. my having gotten it wrong.
Fair enough, and I'm usually the fir
ves real people real time, especially in
critical situations.
and BTW, mountd is already
heavely patched, rpc.statd less, and rpc.lockd is, so far, the only one
that is not complaining - guess Rick is a good programer!
and I concider myself lucky that we don't use NIS/yellow-pages.
e to
learn FreeBSD, your best bet is visit the home page at
http://www.FreeBSD.org/, look under Documentation, and start reading the
Handbook.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Bre
On 03/29/2011 12:37, Adam Vande More wrote:
Java is a different matter. Handbook should be updated to use the iced tea
plugin since the other java plugin doesn't work on new FF plus it's other
deficiencies.
It's been update for some time now. :)
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/de
hat's easy to use,
FreeBSD is not it. We need to be honest with ourselves about that if
we're ever going to make progress on it.
Doug
PS, it would be really helpful if people could tone down the language a
bit, and the vitriol a lot. Thanks.
--
Nothin' ever do
experiences. So if all
you want is a Unix'y desktop OS (and you can't afford/don't want a mac),
use it, and be happy. If you have other goals (such as learning Unix
internals generally, or a specific OS) then you have other areas you can
focus on, such as Fre
On 4/1/2011 8:47 AM, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
If you want to get rid of the reboot loop, set:
background_fsck="NO"
Then it will either come up, or ask for help if anything fails.
If you absolutely want the server to come up, you can set this
fsck_y_enable="YES"
+1
--
Nothin' ever
er an opinion on. And
yet, there is no actual problem here. As I said when I closed the PR,
using the full path is the safest, most conservative option, and there
is no reason to do otherwise. Let's move on.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but
to read freebsd-current@ and the relevant commit mail.
Doug (Yes, seriously)
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right p
and it'll get fixed
until now, but that didn't happen, hence my mail.
Traditional solution for similar problems is to clean out your /usr/obj/
and try again.
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK G
It's happened in the past that certain changes haven't resulted in
commit mail, but given that this happened so close to the update I
thought I'd mention it.
Doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
On 05/04/2011 04:49, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded my Soekris 4801 boxes from 8.1 to 8.2-STABLE (r221326) a few
days ago and now I get the following error in the daily mail:
Backing up package db directory:
tar: : Cannot stat: No such file or directory
tar: Error exit delayed from previ
On 05/04/2011 16:25, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Move PKG_DBDIR out of ports(7) and/or duplicate it to
/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk.
A) That's a non-starter
B) Doesn't actually solve the problem at hand
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK G
On 05/04/2011 04:49, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
make -f/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk -V PKG_DBDIR
"/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 11: Could not find
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
I fixed this in HEAD by setting the default if pulling it from make
fails.
On 05/04/2011 23:56, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
On 05/05/11 04:43, Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/04/2011 04:49, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
make -f/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk -V PKG_DBDIR
"/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 11: Could not find
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
make: fatal errors encountered
On 05/26/2011 14:35, William Palfreman wrote:
I do think that it would be better if failure to mount an NFS share due
to DHCP not being finished did not cause the boot to halt. Non-root
filesystem NFS mounts are rarely so critical that is it necessary to drop
into single user mode instead - espe
nt my experiences, procedures, etc...
We definitely want people to help test this out. It was designed from
the start to be robust and do recovery for RAID 1 which is our use.
We had previously hacked enhanced support into ataraid(4) and ata(4) for
use in-house.
D
On 07/13/2011 23:42, joerg_surmann wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> i have in my .xinitrc:
> exec /usr/local/bin/gpg-agent --daemon --write-env-file
> .gnupg/agent.info /usr/home/holm/.gpg-agent-info
>
> Thats don't start gpg-agent.
Take a look at this:
http://dougbarton.us/PGP/gpg-agent.html
--
On 08/05/2011 20:38, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Ahh, but OP had moved these files away and performance was still poor..
> _that_ is the bug.
I'm no file system expert, but it seems to me the key questions are; how
long does it take the system to recover from this condition, and if it's
more than N
On 08/10/2011 19:51, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>
>>> Looks like SIGTTOU (output from background process)?
>>> This should be controllable with stty -tostop.
>>> (But why has it changed...?)
>>
>> On all our RELENG_8 systems (though I use bas
where to look would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Doug
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:224
224 pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
in pcpu.h
(kgdb) #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:224
#1 0x803ec4be in boot (howto=260)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:419
#2 0x803ec8f1 in panic
On 09/26/2011 16:02, crsnet.pl wrote:
>
>> 2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu.
>> I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to
>> Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/
>> Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11.
>> I try to use old gadulib, or recompie it. But this doesn't help ;/
>
>
7625 httpd3.064293 GIO fd 85 read 30 bytes
97625 httpd3.064296 STRU struct sockaddr { AF_INET, 127.0.0.1:53 }
97625 httpd3.064299 RET recvfrom 30/0x1e
97625 httpd3.064308 CALL close(0x55)
I'm open to suggestions on where to look to improve this situation.
Thanks,
Doug
--
Thanks Jeremy and Chuck. Answers below.
On 09/30/2011 17:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:31:18PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> So, this is a bit of an odd one I've got a web server running
>> apache 2.2.17 and php 5.3.5
On 10/12/2011 06:47, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:39 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
>> On 29/09/2011 02:42, Ken Smith wrote:
>>> MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-bootonly.iso) =
>>> 2ce7b93d28fd7ff37965893f1af3f7fc
>>> MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-dvd1.iso) = 4affc701f2052edc548274f090e49235
On 10/14/2011 17:48, Oleg Ginzburg wrote:
> Hi
>
> With /etc/periodic/daily/220.backup-pkgdb I would also suggest backing up
> /var/db/ports dir
I'm curious as to the reason for doing this. The options are easy to
recreate, and not particularl
On 10/16/2011 21:27, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 17.10.2011 10:13, Doug Barton пишет:
>> On 10/14/2011 17:48, Oleg Ginzburg wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> With /etc/periodic/daily/220.backup-pkgdb I would also suggest backing up
>>> /var/db/ports dir
>>
ame as the one
in the temproot then it deletes the temproot version and moves on. That
behavior was primarily designed to accommodate configuration files, but
it works just as well for everything else mergemaster deals with.
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't c
Trying to track down a load problem we're seeing on 8.2-RELEASE-p4 i386
in a busy web hosting environment I came across the following post:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-October/234520.html
That basically describes what we're seeing as well, including the
"doesn't happ
On 11/14/2011 12:31, Doug Barton wrote:
> Trying to track down a load problem we're seeing on 8.2-RELEASE-p4 i386
> in a busy web hosting environment I came across the following post:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-October/234520.html
>
> T
On 11/14/2011 12:56, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, November 14, 2011 3:31:43 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>> Trying to track down a load problem we're seeing on 8.2-RELEASE-p4 i386
>> in a busy web hosting environment I came across the following post:
>>
>> http://lis
On 11/15/2011 02:09, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:51:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 11/14/2011 12:31, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> Trying to track down a load problem we
On 11/16/2011 23:49, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46:27PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 11/15/2011 02:09, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:51:35PM -080
ocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0,0xbfbf89d4)
That the rtld calls don't exhibit.
Kostik, thanks for your more detailed response, we'll poke that a bit
and report back.
Doug
--
"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
"Too practical."
Bread
On 11/17/2011 00:12, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:59:06PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 11/16/2011 23:49, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46:27PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> On 11/15/2011 02:09, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
eginning? Sorry to
be so dense.
> I want to see a backtrace from the breakpoint hit.
> Several times.
Me too. :)
Meanwhile, in response to one of the other questions, we are using
mpm_prefork. Also, the particular problem we're seeing does not appear
related to fork
On 11/18/2011 01:19, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:00:57AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 11/17/2011 02:57, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>>>> It's not catching there though:
>>>>>
>>>>> Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-e
aster was merged to RELENG_7 but appropiate version of tzsetup
> was not.
Well that's embarrassing. :)
Edwin, what are the chances that you could MFC your changes to tzsetup?
Doug
--
"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
"Too pra
On 12/3/2011 8:16 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> For machines that run UTC, it's not needed.
FYI, the code in mergemaster checks for that.
--
"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
"Too practical."
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge
On 12/3/2011 6:00 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On 04/12/2011, at 11:12 , Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 12/3/2011 8:14 AM, Max Khon wrote:
>>> Christian,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christian Weisgerber
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
arious tunables, dtrace'ing, etc. The cause of the problem
was never found.
I switched to 4BSD, problem gone.
This is on 2 separate systems with core 2 duos.
hth,
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the
ufs denied
0 requests for sfbufs delayed
809790 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
0 calls to protocol drain routines
So is this message something to worry about? If so, how can I diagnose
what's happening, and how do I fix it?
Doug
___
free
On 12/04/2011 12:51, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/3/2011 6:00 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
>> On 04/12/2011, at 11:12 , Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 12/3/2011 8:14 AM, Max Khon wrote:
>>>> Christian,
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christi
On 12/13/2011 13:31, Malin Randstrom wrote:
> stop sending me spam mail ... you never stop despite me having unsubscribeb
> several times. stop this!
If you had actually unsubscribed, the mail would have stopped. :)
You can see the instructions you need to follow below.
> ___
On 12/14/2011 11:46, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Dec 13), Doug Barton said:
>> I'm running 8.2-RELEASE-p4 i386 on some web servers that are generally
>> lightly-moderately loaded, but occasionally see some heavy spikes where
>> load average goes way up. W
taking so much cpu? HZ=100 if that
makes a difference ...
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
___
freebsd-stable@f
uld ship one kernel with both schedulers available it
should be simple to modify the installer to choose the right one and put
the right stuff in loader.conf.
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours f
tching schedulers on a running system and loading
one or the other at boot time are different problems, are they not?
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_
rnel itself why not do that instead?
Of lesser, but not insignificant consideration is the possibility that
at some point we'll have more than 2 scheduler options.
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the r
On 12/16/2011 14:59, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> It really looks much easier than i thought initially.
Awesome!
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
entical to the code in stable/8. If
you update your src tree and then update tzsetup you should no longer
experience this problem.
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
m sure you can take bz' word that it's being
looked at now though.
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
___
fr
27;m glad that Steve was able to produce useful results, and
hopefully it will lead to improvements.
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
___
1 - 100 of 1203 matches
Mail list logo