On 02/18/2011 10:08, Rick Macklem wrote:
The attached patches changes the behaviour so that it tries to
get an unused port for each of the 4 cases.

Am I correct in assuming that what you're proposing is to (potentially) have different ports for all 4 combinations? I would suggest that this is not the right way to solve the problem. If I misunderstand, I apologize.


Doug


--

        Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
                        -- OK Go

        Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
        Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to