h the MFC or r215207.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
___
freebsd-stable@freebs
eady.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
man/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handb
o support that exact chip.
Probably needs some special initialization and a couple of if ()s, as
usual.
LSI/Dell are the people to talk to.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/
DATING?revision=196789&view=markup
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
___
freebsd
am willing to spend more time on it
:: if you send me an email.
So if anyone of you is still using NATM, please follow-up with me to
keep your functionality. If there is no feedback NATM is still
scheduled for removal.
Thank you.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You ha
Hi,
this is a heads up in case anyone is relying on this in private VNET
modules or code. I am planning on merging this code to stable/8
probably during the weekend. It should be a NOP for almost everyone,
especially if not running a VIMAGE kernel.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
branch would be good.
I would assume that if you have both machines running the newer kernel
and would start ping6 from both things would also start working
immediately.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for
[goes and tries]
No, that doesnt work - they both hang for a while and eventually start.
Ok, then it's even les obvious than what I thought. I'll keep you
updated.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin
On Apr 17, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, Pete French wrote:
>
>>> I assume both are stable/8? Are you sure on the Feb 25th kernel
>>> doing ok or could it be that you are just more lucky?
>>
>> I've rolled every
or /project area in svn with an
older version of a backport but I am not sure if it was ever updated again.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
ave the
fix and the fix could possibly be merges to 8 from there then
but knowing that just this fix applied to stable/8 works would be good for that.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new
ne to help that, which
are partly (mostly, all these days) existent in newer upstream version
(esepcially the latest devels).
I'll go an look in my 70 oustanding MFCs.
Would be cool if you could test 9 temporary and see if things are
better there.
/bz
--
Bjoe
enc(4)?
net.enc.in.ipsec_bpf_mask=0x0003
net.enc.in.ipsec_filter_mask=0x0003
Any hints on the PF rules required to allow those packets in ?
need more details (if you want also off-list).
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coi
db) l *ata_completed+0x727
489 (request->callback)(request);
490 else
491 sema_post(&request->done);
492
493 /* only call ata_start if channel is present */
494 if (ch)
495 ata_start(ch->dev);
496 }
497
498 void
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
On 11/16/11 08:43, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
we have seen this or a very similar panic for about 1 year now once in
a while and I think I reported it before; this is FreeBSD as guest on
vmware. Seems it was a double panic this time. Could
stion might be working better for the moment.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
kes a bit) and do basic testing, upload and then give them time to propagate
to mirrors.
That also means that stable/9 will probably soon be opened again for normal
merge procedure.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Inse
On 20. Dec 2011, at 10:01 , Claude Buisson wrote:
> It seems (from my own csup's and cvswe.cgi) that the src commits are lost,
> starting with r228697 Sun Dec 18 22:04:55 2011)
>
> What is going on (or off) ?
Re $subject -- yes. It will be worked on.
-
days ago that this was going to happen seems to have
> gone un-heeded. :) I'm sure you can take bz' word that it's being
> looked at now though.
It's been fixed and the changes should propagate to cvsup mirrors close
to everyone the next two hours.
/bz
--
Bjoern
updated man page:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/jail/jail.8?r1=221665&r2=224286
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
___
freebsd-stabl
I'm doing tests on a fix now.
Alternatively I can MFC the knobs; they are part of the other 50 possible
MFCs in my mailbox to do; I had just planned to wait on the entire stable/9/8/7
sweep to go by first.
There was also a follow-up fix from me on this...
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 4. Jan 2012, at 19:40 , John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:44 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On 4. Jan 2012, at 18:01 , John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>>>>
>>>&g
.
>
> I've not tested on 9, but this was certainly the case on 8.2.
8.2 did not shipped them so you had installed them yourself?
What kind of performance degradations and in which kind of environment
an how "noticeable"?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
aight back to standard ssh.
>
> I'll try and get some time to retest and provide some proper
> results.
Thanks. If you do please try the bundled version in 8-STABLE or 9 and
also gather the usual meta data (latency, packet loss, IPv4/v6, any
socket buffer tu
On 16. Jan 2012, at 04:56 , Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <
> bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>
>> On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote:
>>
>>> Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experie
'm not able to give epair0b inside the jail an ip address. I get
>> "permission denied".
>>
>> Also it looks a bit strange:
>>
>> ===
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter h
d posting here, plural, in general) sure, that
you don't want to read up on freebsd-jail and give the framework a try which
might make your life easier...
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2011-July/thread.html#1568
I am sure Jamie would like feedback and now that 9.0 is done get r
we upgrade our jail setup VIMAGE will be also a must.
I have read that multiple times already and I'd love to but that's a looong way.
The plan might be to one day provide a 2nd kernel to install from and that
freebsd-update can handle but we'll see.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
is not as easy as it sounds, especially making them unloadable
again currently ...
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-s
o you happen to know why the amd64 kernel did hang on boot?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
p://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/UPDATING, I don't think it's been MFCd
> (there's a primer for the new carp in current's UPDATING)\
There's no plans to MFC given it changes things significantly.
I however wonder if someone wants to provide a user branch in SVN to
provide
> - IPSTEALTH (disabled in loader.conf)
> - IPFIREWALL_FORWARD (touches every packet, power users which need
> a bigger PPS but not this feature can recompile the kernel,
> discussed with julian@)
> - FLOWTABLE (disabled in loader.conf)
Which is not the same as it's not 100% d
s to reproduce this maybe a clue on how long
they'll have to wait? For that matter, is it a stock 9.0 or your own kernel?
What other modules are loaded?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how g
months (in HEAD) without further needs to re-adjustment. I am not
sure we ever allowed compiling with BURN_BRIDGES set but I can change the
#ifndef to THIS_IS_PART_OF_THE_PUBLIC_STABLE_KPI or something if needed.
See the comment above it:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/sys/netinet6/in6_
s but you also need
to fix ipsec-tools or your ike daemon. If you do the latter I can commit
the former.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
l).
>
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/8.3TODO
Which was already mentioned in an earlier pre-release announcement.
> I assume once it's released, this will be updated:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup
Which it was yesterday along with the release.
/bz
--
On 22. Apr 2012, at 21:59 , Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> A RELENG_8 system built this morning still identifies itself as
> 8.3-PRERELEASE.
>
> Any chance of this becoming 8.3-STABLE soon? While this is entirely
> cosmetic, it does cause me issues at $JOB.
Fixed.
--
still
using libkvm *sigh* and not the sysctl API.
> Anyone know why this behavior might be happening?
Without thinking too much (as in if I got the right case) I think you are
hitting this one:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/net/rtsock.c?annotate=234572#l792
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 2. May 2012, at 05:11 , Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 09:01:33PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On 1. May 2012, at 19:41 , David Thiel wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> So, I've been trying to debug an issue running nmap sca
will work
with a double-NAT (both i and r sitting behind a NAT) and not just i behind a
NAT and r sitting there with a globally routable IP.
The changes suddenly become a lot more complex. Just my 5cts.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions
it script to solve
> the problem? I'm new to freenas/BSD but am willing to try working from the
> Cmd line.
ntpd in head 9.0 and later and 8.3 and later should not exhibit that problem
anymore as it was fixed. Could you please tell me if that is not the c
ogging
should stop. I would assume that a newer FreeNAS release will pick these
things up automatically once they go to 8.3 or 9.0.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
_
.168.100.51/32"
> ifconfig_em0_alias1="inet6 2a00:abcd:0:405::3/64"
>
> defaultrouter="192.168.100.49"
> ipv6_defaultrouter="2a00:abcd:0:405::1"
>
> Please correct me, if there is a better solution.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup
8.1 and 8.2 will drop out of security support July 31 this year, given
8.3 has been available for at least 3 months then. Also 8.3 is an
extended release supported until 2014.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have vis
hanks,
Bjoern
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
#1308
I think your comments (and patches) are better sent there, rather than
to sta...@.
Gruesse,
Bjern
--
Bjoern A. ZeebFrom August on I will have a life. It's now up to you
to do the maths and count to 64. -- Bondorf, Germany, 14th
havent seen it on the
other LNS boxes that have the same setup, except no ipv6. It was happily
running for a few days until this error started showing up ?
I thought this was fixed already but maybe only in HEAD and not
merged. I'll go and look.
/bz
--
Bjoern A.
;s only a matter of extracting patches
now but it'll be anohter few days till I'll get to that.
/bz
PS: freebsd-virtualization@ might be the better place to post VIMAGE
problems.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb This signature is about you not me.
__
ve a machine with ISA slots to
test things. If someone fixes the infrastructure and 1 driver I'll
also happily ship them so (s)he can do the others as well and test
and maintain things for the next couple of years.
Pick your poison;-)
HTH
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
maybe add a bit for extra safety?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
infodir=/usr/share/info'
'--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--enable-threads' '--enable-getifaddrs'
'--disable-linux-caps' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-randomdev=/dev/random'
+.if ${MK_INET6_SUPPORT} == "no"
+CONFIGARGS+=&#x
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
2) I am (was) still running C4B on amd64 on RELENG_8 with a privately
hacked together capi call log, which is a hack without me even
thinking about capi (specs) when doing it, but was doing the job
for me for 7 and 8. Getting the last C4B
ng.
/bz
PS: freebsd-virtualization@ is the best list to report "VIMAGE" or
"vnet" related problems.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
er
the weekend and we'll see if you can still reproduce it after
patching.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
ised that much due to the lack of 2) above.
The jail(8) documentation (mine lists FreeBSD 8.1 January 17, 2010)
seems to be missing documentation on the vnet command (due to the
experimental status)?
Right, vnets are still considered experimental.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
got another private report just now
on this one; is any of you by chance running VLANs on the systems
you see this happening?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_U
no member named
'if_index_reserved'
*** Error code 1
That would be mine though a universe had successfully completed with
the merge.
I'll go and look.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons lik
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi David,
Now, I actually build for the system in question on my build machine
(which builds a GENERIC kernel for itself, as well as kernels for the
above-mentioned machine and another).
This morning, it was running FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE r214547
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
just to get this out. Jack you might want to review and if ok, include
in HEAD before we get feedback maybe. To my understanding worst it
would be overhead but not really harm.
>>>>> Oct 22 02:06:02 i4 kernel: em1: discard f
load stuff enabled (as the subject suggests)? If so
what happens if you disable this?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
nglist and check the archives.
You'll find patches there.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
ons on
the usual jls output.
Please see the freebsd-jail mailing list archives of
the last weeks and months for more info.
I hope very much that these patches will be included
officially in RELENG_7 soon.
This seems to imply that, at last, IPv6 addresses can be used in jails -
is that true?
yes
-
for 9, when vimage will provide the infrastructure,
etc. This means that 8 would be the transition period. But that's
just me and my ideas - we'll see how it'll go.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.
ve to ship less patches integrated into
the jail patch for 7. So yes the plan is to finish the MFCs and generate a
new patch for 7 the next days (most likely beginning of next week).
Regards,
Bjoern
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new
t on to another
decapsulation the flag should be cleared when entering gre() for
example.
The other question of course is why we do not send the icmp error back
even on plain ipsec? Is it because we could possibly leak information
as it's not caught by the policy sending it back?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Ze
stable@ and setting reply-to: to move the discussion
there.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsu
that
people may want to think along with it in the future.
After all you want the information to be peristent over a reboot so
you have to write it out somehow anyway.
Just my 0.02CAD
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.
_
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, cpghost wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:23:05PM +0100, cpghost wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:07:32PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, cpghost wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:34:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh yeah, since we'
. More specifically, a
cloning route "2001:0db8:2::1/64 -> link#2" was removed for some
reason.
Is this an expected behavior?
I don't think so. Can you file a PR and get it assigned to bz@ and
I'll look in two weeks or so once I am fully back.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
try and review it for 7-STABLE, etc.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
I have a possible MFC candidate patch at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20090128-02-jail7-mfc.diff
to merge the multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails to 7-STABLE. My plan would be
to do so during the weekend of 6-8th February 2009.
In addition to
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 10:22 AM 1/28/2009, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
I have a possible MFC candidate patch at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20090128-02-jail7-mfc.diff
Hi Bjoern,
Will this patch allow for the creation of tun interfaces inside of a
jail
o escape - you sure won't succeed;)
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any ma
ffected by this.
I'll let you know once it is fixed.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
I merged a change I had tested in my working but not a vanilla
stable/7 tree. This broke make installkernel.
I am currently investigating if it's easily fixable w/o side effects
or I'll back it out in a bit.
If your sys/conf/kern.p
e. The URL
has stayed the same:
http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html
The page has a few instructions and links to further information. You
may want to read them before doing anything else to help everybody.
Thanks!
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greate
oming 8.0 RELEASE or the
9-CURRENT development branch.
Should no valid complaints come up saying that someone needs (and
actively uses *cough* PECOFF support on FreeBSD it'll be removed
earliest Novemeber 29th 2009 00:00 UTC (in about one week).
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not br
side the jail?
Also, how did you start the jail? jls -av output might be
interesting.
/bz
PS: there is a freebsd-jail list as well.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
version on stable/8 so it should be fine now.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
y in between has nothing to do with this, only the IPsec ends.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
The panic does not occur with the same kernel compiled without options
VIMAGE.
FAQ from virtualization@ ; pf support for VIMAGE only basically exists
here: http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/eri/pf45/head/
but is not fully ready either.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know
is trouble by providing additional info?
Looking at the info I doubt it's related to jails or Pg in first
place. Have you been running that same setup already before your Apr
1st, r206031, kernel? If so, from when was your last kernel?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you
to updat again; I hadn't realized before that your
r206031 seems to be in the middle of a multi-commit merge from two
people.
It would be worth to update to the latest stable/8 and try again
first.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you
between two commits. Updating
again seemed to have fixed it for him.
None of those changes are in 7.3-RELEASE though and the endless loop
indeed should no happen.
Is the kernel and the core file still avail for further analyses?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what
d need
SVN r206469,206470,206481 applied to 8-STABLE.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Denis Lamanov wrote:
Hi,
vmstat -m | grep lltable
every 3 minutes increases :(
lltable 16938 2149K -17779 128,256
I'll MFC the patches to fix that the next couple of days, maybe
tommorow morning. In case you
[address
[dest_address]] [parameters]
The following parameters may be set with ifconfig:
-alias Remove the network address specified. This would be used if you
...
Conclusion: -alias is a "parameter" and belongs to the end after
the address.
The it works for IPv4
s that fix this? Then I can merge this fix to my
local tree.
I think it was this change:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200801130945.m0D9jsgf040114
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Software is harder than hardware so better get it right
etinet/tcp_var.h
In case you are not using MD5 that should be enough. Else see
freebsd-net from the last 3 days for another patch.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Software is harder than hardware
review.
In case the above is a successor of pjd's multi-ip v4 jail patch I can
give you a plain forward port to a FreeBSD 7 system (which might have
possible locking issues I have never experienced).
All depends on how quickly you need it.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
and kernel-configuration attached.
Could you get a backtrace?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html
might help you with further debugging.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Software is harder than hardware so
ng on in FreeBSD atm or come up with new patches..
Regards,
Bjoern
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Just for the public; I am talking to him privately currently; I'll
summarize findings either here or in a commit message.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin fo
xpereincing problems with packets dropped due to
invalid checksums with IPv6 and pf after the recent merges, can you
report back if you also see this without "modulate state" in your
pf.conf (if you have 'modulate' in there, can you try changing it to
'keep' and see if th
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 01/08/2012 18:13, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Any of you who are expereincing problems with packets dropped due to
invalid checksums with IPv6 and pf after the recent merges, can you
report back if you also see this without "modulate state&quo
ork
was not yet merged to head or 9; I have 1 or 2 patches posted to net@
for review and testing though. Sorry not immediately helpful.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received.
other the
next 12 hours. Enjoy!
Any further discussions on src export I'll leave to other people
wearing hats.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new addr
t; epair0b
>
> and run dhclient on epair0b.
> But nothing comes through, not even on epair0a.
> bridge0 itself receives packets.
> No firewall involved.
>
> Any ideas?
Just checking, are all interfaces UP?
—
Bjoern A. Zeeb Charles Haddon Spur
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
