Hello, Freebsd-stable.
You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 10:24:16:
> And all connections are reset. Before latest commits to driver
> this system paniced in swi_clock. Now it works without panics, but
> seems, that problem is not fixed completely.
I forgot to give one last pice of information: POLL
On 01.02.2011 13:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-stable.
> You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 10:24:16:
>
>> And all connections are reset. Before latest commits to driver
>> this system paniced in swi_clock. Now it works without panics, but
>> seems, that problem is not fixed completely.
hi,
I have one disk, labeled r0 (/dev/mfid0), which i gpart'ed so:
=>34 1952448445 mfid0 GPT (931G)
34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K)
162 4194304 2 freebsd-ufs (2.0G)
4194466 100663296 3 freebsd-swap (48G)
104857762 1847590717
I don't test POLLING, sounds like its broken, I don't understand
why you think you need you need it? This hardware supports
MSI why not use it?
Jack
2011/1/31 Lev Serebryakov
> Hello, Freebsd-stable.
> You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 10:24:16:
>
> > And all connections are reset. Before latest
On 01/30/11 12:09, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:38PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousov wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch
I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you can,
try it and see
We have tried POLLING here on Intel cards attached to the igb driver
(see my post entitled "High interrupt rate on a PF box + performance"
from 27/01/2011".
This broke carp *badly* and we switched back to interrupts.
You say a single thread eats up a full CPU core, can you post a top to
show the
Hi list,
I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally
What I want is:
1. List the wireless access points,
grep if there is one which bssid is 'bb:bb:bb:bb:bb:bb',
if there is, then set ifconfig_wlan0 to the value:
"inet 192.168.1.111 netmask 255.255.255.0 WPA"
2. chec
Hello, Eugene & Jack.
You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 11:23:23:
Eugene wrote:
> You could give a try to netisr parallelism of RELENG_8 instead of POLLING
> (and tune interrupt throttling) if your box does not have lots of dynamic
> interfaces like when using mpd.
Jack wrote:
> I don't test POLLING,
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:35:06PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally
>
> What I want is:
>
> 1. List the wireless access points,
>
> grep if there is one which bssid is 'bb:bb:bb:bb:bb:bb',
>
> if there is, then set ifconfig_wl
On 01/02/2011 13:35, Yue Wu wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally
Technically, yes it can be done, but you shouldn't. It is in essence a
shell script as it is sourced by other shell scripts but that's only
because that approach is easiest to impleme
On 01.02.2011 18:38, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> = INTR - ISR.DIRECT=1
> Real speed (accroding to Windows'7 report) ~101MiB/s.
>
> I've re-created file to flush caches on both sides between trys.
>
netisr queues help to deal with lots of incoming traffic.
If you bother about outg
Hello, Eugene.
You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 16:52:57:
>> = INTR - ISR.DIRECT=1
>> Real speed (accroding to Windows'7 report) ~101MiB/s.
>> I've re-created file to flush caches on both sides between trys.
> netisr queues help to deal with lots of incoming traffic.
> If you bother
Quoting Yue Wu (from Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:35:06 +0800):
2. check if bitlbee has been installed, if so, then let bitlbee
service start.
So I tried with following settings in rc.conf, but all of them failed,
i.e., the networking can't be connected and bitlbee service doesn't
run.
/etc/rc.conf
On 2/1/11 1:35 PM, Yue Wu wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally
>
> What I want is:
>
> 1. List the wireless access points,
>
> grep if there is one which bssid is 'bb:bb:bb:bb:bb:bb',
>
> if there is, then set ifconfig_wlan0 to the value:
>
>
On Monday, January 31, 2011 5:29:24 pm John Hickey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:00:29PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> (kgdb) vprint vp
> 0xd417633c: tag none, type VBAD
> usecount 0, writecount 0, refcount 1 mountedhere 0x0
> flags (VI_DOOMED)
> lock type ufs: UNLOCKED with 1 pend
Hi FreeBSD-{stable,current,fs},
I've reliably been able to cause the ZFS subsystem to hang under FreeBSD
8.1-RELEASE under the following conditions:
Another server is sending the server an incremental snapshot stream
which is in the process of being received with:
zfs send -I $OLD $FS@$N
Hi FreeBSD-{stable,current,fs},
I've reliably been able to cause the ZFS subsystem to hang under FreeBSD
8.1-RELEASE under the following conditions:
Another server is sending the server an incremental snapshot stream
which is in the process of being received with:
zfs send -I $OLD $FS@$N
Hello, Eugene.
You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 15:38:33:
> Eugene wrote:
>> You could give a try to netisr parallelism of RELENG_8 instead of POLLING
>> (and tune interrupt throttling) if your box does not have lots of dynamic
>> interfaces like when using mpd.
> Jack wrote:
>> I don't test POLLING,
On 01/20/11 03:05, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Eugene.
You wrote 19 января 2011 г., 12:50:25:
Yes, I've missed it's PRERELEASE already.
Backtrace points to the problem in em_local_timer() fixed in CURRENT
7 days ago, take a look:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c
Hello, Adam.
You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 21:59:31:
> Did it help the problem? I think I saw a related panic today so I'm
> going to try updating past the time this was MFC'ed to 8 which I think
> was Sat Jan 22 01:34:08 2011 UTC (10 days, 17 hours ago). Thanks.
It doesn't crash anymore, but my
Hey All,
I'm having an odd issue, and the only thing I can imagine is that there
has been a major change between 8.1 and 8.2.
Using the 8.1 kernel everything is dandy. But when I try to use a newly
compiled kernel from 8.2(GENERIC) I have no luck. Root will not mount.
Here are relevant k
According to Damien Fleuriot:
> As requested, find below the output of a verbose boot.
Thanks to Damien and his machine, we have seen that in RAID mode, the mps
driver, backported from current (backported as in, drop the mps directory in
the 8.2 tree) is not able to see the RAID array.
De-const
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:34:18PM -0500, Colin Legendre wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I'm having an odd issue, and the only thing I can imagine is that
> there has been a major change between 8.1 and 8.2.
>
> Using the 8.1 kernel everything is dandy. But when I try to use a
> newly compiled kernel fro
On 2/1/2011 6:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:34:18PM -0500, Colin Legendre wrote:
Hey All,
I'm having an odd issue, and the only thing I can imagine is that
there has been a major change between 8.1 and 8.2.
Using the 8.1 kernel everything is dandy. But when I try t
Hi,
I know tmpfs(5) is experimental on FreeBSD, but it seems to be enabled
for ports-mgmt/tinderbox-devel, which probably not too coincidentally
had just started a build before the machine panic'd.
uname:
FreeBSD orion 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #8 r217160: Sat Jan
8 14:17:44 EST 201
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:18:28PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know tmpfs(5) is experimental on FreeBSD, but it seems to be enabled
> for ports-mgmt/tinderbox-devel, which probably not too coincidentally
> had just started a build before the machine panic'd.
>
> uname:
>
> FreeBSD orio
On 2/1/11 7:56 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> Any advice on how I can help provide further information would be
>> appreciated.
>
> At this time do not mix tmpfs with ZFS:
>
> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/stable/2011-01/msg00344.html
>
Thanks for the info.
Cheers,
--
Glen B
27 matches
Mail list logo
