Hi unionfs folks
It is my pleasure and honor to announce the commitment of
latest unionfs improvements for 8-current, RELENG_7 and
RELENG_6. Now you can get more stable operation using
unionfs on latest 8/7/6.
This latest improvements give finstall and FreeSBIE works
more well as well as other u
- Original Message
> From: Ken Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 5:21:00 AM
> Subject: 7.0-BETA1 Available, 6.3-BETA1 coming soon...
>
>
> We have entered the final phases of the FreeBSD-7.0 Release cycle which
Hello,
Running make for makeworld or in ports gives problems since my upgrade
yesterday.
Running 6.2-STABLE of yesterday on i386.
--
stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> RELENG_7 isn't -STABLE yet
Uhm, are you sure? In the past, whenever a new RELENG
branch was created, it was implicitly the next -stable
branch, because -current moved on to the next version
number. Did that policy change?
If it did change, I'm curious to know what the
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 18:22 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > RELENG_7 isn't -STABLE yet
>
> Uhm, are you sure? In the past, whenever a new RELENG
> branch was created, it was implicitly the next -stable
> branch, because -current moved on to the next version
> number. D
Hi,
This unit is supposedly going to be my new home ws, are the below acpi
errors something that I need to worry about?
Thanks,
--per
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:18:11 +0200, Ronald Klop
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Running make for makeworld or in ports gives problems since my upgrade
yesterday.
Running 6.2-STABLE of yesterday on i386.
--
stage 1.1: legacy re
How risky is it to start using 7.0-BETA1 in production, with the
intention of upgrading to release as soon as possible? Thanks.
BTW, where can I find 7-STABLE release notes? It's not here:
http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes.html
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:57:52 +0200, rihad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How risky is it to start using 7.0-BETA1 in production, with the
intention of upgrading to release as soon as possible? Thanks.
BTW, where can I find 7-STABLE release notes? It's not here:
http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes.htm
rihad wrote:
How risky is it to start using 7.0-BETA1 in production, with the
intention of upgrading to release as soon as possible? Thanks.
We've used 7-CURRENT since January on a couple of production boxes and
had very few disasters, well, none, but a couple of issues.
"Risky" is a relativ
>
> Also, the list of things to do is a bit mis-ordered and truncated. The
> official list is in /usr/src/UPDATING and reads:
>
>
> make buildworld
> make kernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
> [1]
>
Using mplayer to try play a DVD my errorconsole is spammed with:
ata1: FAILURE - non aligned DMA transfer attempted
acd0: setting up DMA failed
The mplayer just hangs around in physrd status and cannot be killed (even by
kill -9). The error message gets posted until the system is shutdown. The
mp
> >
> > Also, the list of things to do is a bit mis-ordered and truncated. The
> > official list is in /usr/src/UPDATING and reads:
> >
> >
> > make buildworld
> > make kernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
> > [1]
> >
>
> --==_Exmh_1193178365_55823P
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> > >
> > > Also, the list of things to do is a bit mis-ordered and truncated. The
> > > official list is in /usr/src/UPDATING and reads:
> > >
> > >
> > > make buildworld
> > > make kernel K
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [LoN]Kamikaze
> Sent: mercredi 24 octobre 2007 00:06
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: RELENG_7 problem with playing DVDs
>
> Using mplayer to try play a DVD my errorconsole is
* Daichi GOTO ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It is my pleasure and honor to announce the commitment of
> latest unionfs improvements for 8-current, RELENG_7 and
> RELENG_6. Now you can get more stable operation using
> unionfs on latest 8/7/6.
>
> This latest improvements give finstall and FreeSBIE
What are the likely release dates (I'm looking for estimates here)
of FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0? We need 6.3, including all of the MFCed
code that's likely to be included in it, for new servers and would
like to begin experimenting with 7.0. The current release
engineering page hasn't been updated in
Olivier Brisson wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [LoN]Kamikaze
>> Sent: mercredi 24 octobre 2007 00:06
>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
>> Subject: RELENG_7 problem with playing DVDs
>>
>> Using mplayer to try
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Olivier Brisson wrote:
> I actually tried with 2 different drives. I can get more detailed, now.
>
> The drive lockup and dmesg spamming till the system has shut down as I
> reported it only occurs if I try to use the drives through the cam interface
> /dev/cd0 or /dev/cd1
df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free space
remain.
However doing a
du -hd 1 /var
and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space, so
there are 1.3G unaccounted for. fsck in single user mode does not recognize a
problem.
_
> df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free space
> remain.
>
> However doing a
> du -hd 1 /var
>
> and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space, so
> there are 1.3G unaccounted for. fsck in single user mode does not recognize a
> problem.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:00:29PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> What are the likely release dates (I'm looking for estimates here) of
> FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0? We need 6.3, including all of the MFCed code that's
> likely to be included in it, for new servers and would like to begin
> experimenting w
Mark Andrews wrote:
>> df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free space
>> remain.
>>
>> However doing a
>> du -hd 1 /var
>>
>> and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space, so
>> there are 1.3G unaccounted for. fsck in single user mode does not
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:27:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free space
> remain.
>
> However doing a
> du -hd 1 /var
>
> and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space, so
> there are 1.3G unaccounted fo
24 matches
Mail list logo
