Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > RELENG_7 isn't -STABLE yet Uhm, are you sure? In the past, whenever a new RELENG branch was created, it was implicitly the next -stable branch, because -current moved on to the next version number. Did that policy change?
If it did change, I'm curious to know what the version 7 branch is called right now (6 being -stable and 8 being -current)? I assume we do not have two -current branches at the same time, do we? Best regards Oliver PS: I do agree that the DTLS security fix doesn't need a FreeBSD Security Advisory, for the reason that it doesn't seem to affect any _released_ FreeBSD version. -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925 _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
