Hello,
which 1000BaseFX (optics) card with SC connector is _best_ for FreeBSD
5-STABLE in SMP environment?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL P
Emanuel Strobl wrote this message on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:44 +0200:
> tonight I wanted to consolidate (for an upcoming trekstor i.beat organix)
> my oggs and therefore eval the difference between reencoded
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] and the original reread
> wavs(tracks)->[EMAIL PR
Hi all,
Without a doubt I can reproduce this panic every single time.
1. Insert UMASS USB Stick
2. mount as msdos
3. umount USB stick
4. remove USB stick
4. some time laster [hours/days] *panic*: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs
OS-Version: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Jul 14 12:32:30 CST 2005
[/var/
Hi,
[ please avoid cross-posting, RELENG_6 is still in its beta stage, so
-current@ should be use for now. ]
> When trying to unmount my flash drive with force (#umount -f /flash) machine
> hardlocked.
> After restart, when fsck-ing in background, computer panicked.
> Machine is SMP 2x500MHz PI
AAron
could you please email the site for the firmware update?
thank you in advance,
Jon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[Sorry, this is a late reply, but might be helpful.]
Daniel Gerzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Brandon,
> Thursday, September 15, 2005, 5:17:57 AM, you wrote:
> > [...]
> > nullfs looks interesting. I was thinking about sharing files
> > between jails using NFS, but it looks like nullfs
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:37:03AM +0200, ComteZero _ wrote:
C> Hello,
C>
C> it's been two weeks I try to find out what's wrong. Clean install from cvsup
C> STABLE (5).
C> my ADSL account works fine with REL. 4.4+rp_pppoe but not with my new STABLE
C> (5) (without using rp_pppoe).
C> could someo
I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 9/19/05, Eriq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0
>
Most likely a month after 6.0 is released, as they are busy getting
6.0 ready for the release.
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
__
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:21:31PM -0500, Eriq wrote:
> I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0
A few months after 6.0 is released.
Kris
pgpEpLEt0UP6H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
I am using UCARP on two FreeBS= D 4.10-RELEASE-p16 nodes to offer
highly available apache virtual hosts.&nb= sp; Everything seems to
work very well except that occasionally one webserv= er will become
inaccessable from outside it's subnet. I have narrowed= this down to
On Monday 19 September 2005 19:31, Colin Farley wrote:
>1.&nbs=p; Set the arp cache timeout of the cisco router very low so
>that outages a=re minimal. I would rather not do this as it will
>problably stress th=e router too much. Unfortunately I know little
>about cisco devices so
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your reply. = The model of the Cisco router is 2811. Do
you think that lowering the= timeout to 5 seconds would be ok? I have
seen that Cisco does not recommen= d a timeout below 30 seconds but
after reading your reply and seeing as the= re are only a couple
Thanks for that info.
The release engineering page should be updated to reflect this. The last
time I looked (yesterday), it read that 5.5 will be out in September 2005.
Dan
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:21:31PM -0500, Eriq wrote:
I haven't noticed a
Why would 5.5 come out after 6.0, what's the use ?
just upgrade to 6.0 ,.,, no?
Sandro
On 9/19/05, Eriq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0
>
Most likely a month after 6.0 is released, as they are busy getting
6.0 ready for the release.
--
DISCLAIM
On Sep 19, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Colin Farley wrote:
Thanks for your reply. The model of the Cisco router is 2811. Do
you think that lowering the timeout to 5 seconds would be ok? I
have
seen that Cisco does not recommend a timeout below 30 seconds but
after reading your reply and s
In the past, x.0 releases are meant for the adventurous
not the production oriented.
I never go before x.1. And I skipped 3.x completely.
I just got my final server from 4.11 to 5.4 in July.
6.x is probably still 9-12 months away from prime time.
But that's just a guess on my part. I do know tha
Thank you for the explaination paul.
Sandro.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Colin Farley wrote:
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your reply. =he model of the Cisco router is 2811. Do
you think that lowering the=imeout to 5 seconds would be ok? I have
seen that Cisco does not recommen= a timeout below 30 seconds but
after reading your reply and seeing as the=e are
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:36:10PM -0500, Paul T. Root wrote:
> In the past, x.0 releases are meant for the adventurous
> not the production oriented.
>
> I never go before x.1. And I skipped 3.x completely.
> I just got my final server from 4.11 to 5.4 in July.
>
> 6.x is probably still 9-12 mon
Paul T. Root wrote:
In the past, x.0 releases are meant for the adventurous
not the production oriented.
I never go before x.1. And I skipped 3.x completely.
I just got my final server from 4.11 to 5.4 in July.
6.x is probably still 9-12 months away from prime time.
But that's just a guess on m
That's what i thought ... :)
On Sep 19, 2005, at 6:59 PM, Scott Long wrote:
Paul T. Root wrote:
In the past, x.0 releases are meant for the adventurous
not the production oriented.
I never go before x.1. And I skipped 3.x completely.
I just got my final server from 4.11 to 5.4 in July.
6.x i
though after looking at 6.0 beta I couldn't help but think why not just
call it 5.5?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:48PM -0500, Eriq wrote:
> though after looking at 6.0 beta I couldn't help but think why not just
> call it 5.5?
Because it's not a release from the 5.x branch. Read the handbook for
detailed explanation of how FreeBSD releases work.
Kris
pgpqnjzjPR0ja.pgp
Descri
I'm just stating my observations and my decisions
on when I upgraded to a major revision. I started this
back in the early 2.x.x days. I believe 2.2.1 is my
first set of CDs. And I still have most all of them.
I also put in the caveot that a lot of work is being
concentrated on 6.x so times could
On 平成 17/09/19, at 5:32, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
Some more info:
Windows is installed on the same drive. When I launched Partition
Magic
it complained about the LBA and CHS parameters for a partition on the
drive not being identical.
Just in case it's helpful..
FWIW, I've had bad luck with
On Tuesday, September 20, 2005 2:47 AM, Paul Root <> unleashed the infinite
monkeys and produced:
> I will go to 5.5, I'm sure, on my servers. I update
> from source fairly regularly. And that was the original
> question: "Why would 5.5 come out after 6.0?"
For the same reason 4.11 came out after
27 matches
Mail list logo
