Hi,
> Let's say i need to run a few php/sql based web sites and I would like
> to maintain uptime of about 99,99% per month.
> From what You say I need some level of HA system, to maintain the
> required uptime.
Okay
> (i'm skiping (..) network issues at the moment).
Then you won't succeed.
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 08:37:14AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
[snip]
> >> Out of curiosity: have you considered MySQL Cluster:
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySQL_Cluster
> >> http://www.mysql.com/products/database/cluster/faq.html
> >>
> >> If yes, can you share your evaluation results?
> >>
On 7 Apr 2010, at 8:05, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> Until we get to 'database' everything is HA and quite easy to build and
> manage. Having a clustered database solution is expensive and beyond most
> smallish budgets. mysql and postgresql don't have anything available that is
> quite ready ye
On 4/7/2010 2:37 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/2010 08:15:16, Joshua Boyd wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/04/2010 09:05 Aristedes Maniatis said the following:
Until we get to 'database' everything is HA a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/2010 08:15:16, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> on 07/04/2010 09:05 Aristedes Maniatis said the following:
>>> Until we get to 'database' everything is HA and quite easy to build and
>>> manage. H
On 7/04/10 5:00 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/04/2010 09:05 Aristedes Maniatis said the following:
Until we get to 'database' everything is HA and quite easy to build and
manage. Having a clustered database solution is expensive and beyond
most smallish budgets. mysql and postgresql don't have a
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/04/2010 09:05 Aristedes Maniatis said the following:
> > Until we get to 'database' everything is HA and quite easy to build and
> > manage. Having a clustered database solution is expensive and beyond
> > most smallish budgets. mysql an
on 07/04/2010 09:05 Aristedes Maniatis said the following:
> Until we get to 'database' everything is HA and quite easy to build and
> manage. Having a clustered database solution is expensive and beyond
> most smallish budgets. mysql and postgresql don't have anything
> available that is quite rea
On 6/04/10 7:10 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
W dniu 10-04-05 22:43, jfar...@goldsword.com pisze:
Quoting Maciej Jan Broniarz :
W dniu 10-04-05 22:08, Tonix (Antonio Nati) pisze:
Maciej Jan Broniarz ha scritto:
W dniu 10-04-05 17:45, Mike Jakubik pisze:
So first you have to define your w
On Apr 5, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
> W dniu 10-04-05 22:43, jfar...@goldsword.com pisze:
>> Quoting Maciej Jan Broniarz :
>> So first you have to define your workload, then define what errors you
>> must avoid or allow, and then define how to deal with failures, errors,
>> etc.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am thinking about building a fault tolerant web servers running FreeBSD.
> The servers would be serving web sites using jails+apache+php+mysql.
> Would anyone be so kind, as to give me some advice about building such a
> so
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
>
> Let's say i need to run a few php/sql based web sites and I would like to
> maintain uptime of about 99,99% per month. No matter how good the hardware -
> it will always fail at some time. My goal is to build a system, that can
> maint
W dniu 10-04-05 22:43, jfar...@goldsword.com pisze:
Quoting Maciej Jan Broniarz :
W dniu 10-04-05 22:08, Tonix (Antonio Nati) pisze:
Maciej Jan Broniarz ha scritto:
W dniu 10-04-05 17:45, Mike Jakubik pisze:
So first you have to define your workload, then define what errors you
must avoid
Quoting Maciej Jan Broniarz :
W dniu 10-04-05 22:08, Tonix (Antonio Nati) pisze:
Maciej Jan Broniarz ha scritto:
W dniu 10-04-05 17:45, Mike Jakubik pisze:
Just to use exact words, fault toulerancy is not possible with any
FreeBSD/Linux O.S.
F.T. means outage can occur in every moment, but al
Maciej Jan Broniarz ha scritto:
W dniu 10-04-05 22:08, Tonix (Antonio Nati) pisze:
Maciej Jan Broniarz ha scritto:
W dniu 10-04-05 17:45, Mike Jakubik pisze:
>
Just to use exact words, fault toulerancy is not possible with any
FreeBSD/Linux O.S.
F.T. means outage can occur in every moment, bu
W dniu 10-04-05 22:08, Tonix (Antonio Nati) pisze:
Maciej Jan Broniarz ha scritto:
W dniu 10-04-05 17:45, Mike Jakubik pisze:
>
Just to use exact words, fault toulerancy is not possible with any
FreeBSD/Linux O.S.
F.T. means outage can occur in every moment, but all current operation
will be a
Maciej Jan Broniarz ha scritto:
W dniu 10-04-05 17:45, Mike Jakubik pisze:
You may want to check out carp(4).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=carp
Thanks. Carp is fine, but I still have to figure out how to
synchronize data on disks or in the database. Usign just carp would
leave
> soulution similar to drbd+heartbeat on Linux? Geom_gate looks nice, but
> I have no idea if it has been used in a production enviroment.
I use it for production - it works nicely, but you wont get automatic
failover that way.
-pete.
___
freebsd-stab
on 05/04/2010 20:04 Maciej Jan Broniarz said the following:
> W dniu 10-04-05 17:45, Mike Jakubik pisze:
>> You may want to check out carp(4).
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=carp
>>
>
> Thanks. Carp is fine, but I still have to figure out how to synchronize
> data on disks or in th
W dniu 10-04-05 17:45, Mike Jakubik pisze:
You may want to check out carp(4).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=carp
Thanks. Carp is fine, but I still have to figure out how to synchronize
data on disks or in the database. Usign just carp would leave me with
two separate databases c
You may want to check out carp(4).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=carp
On 4/5/2010 7:29 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Hi All,
I am thinking about building a fault tolerant web servers running FreeBSD. The
servers would be serving web sites using jails+apache+php+mysql.
Would anyone
Hi All,
I am thinking about building a fault tolerant web servers running FreeBSD. The
servers would be serving web sites using jails+apache+php+mysql.
Would anyone be so kind, as to give me some advice about building such a
solution? I have read a lot about freebsd cluster, but it was focused
22 matches
Mail list logo
