W dniu 10-04-05 22:43, jfar...@goldsword.com pisze:
Quoting Maciej Jan Broniarz <gau...@gausus.net>:
W dniu 10-04-05 22:08, Tonix (Antonio Nati) pisze:
Maciej Jan Broniarz ha scritto:
W dniu 10-04-05 17:45, Mike Jakubik pisze:
So first you have to define your workload, then define what errors you
must avoid or allow, and then define how to deal with failures, errors,
etc.
Then you can start talking about High Availability vs. level of Fault
tolerance, vs. ....
Let's say i need to run a few php/sql based web sites and I would like
to maintain uptime of about 99,99% per month. No matter how good the
hardware - it will always fail at some time. My goal is to build a
system, that can maintain that uptime.
From what You say I need some level of HA system, to maintain the
required uptime.
So, as I've said earlier (correct me, if I'm wrong) - the setup could
look something like that:
- 2 web servers with carp
- 2 storage servers with on-line sync mechanism running
- 2 mysql servers with on-line database replication
(i'm skiping power and network issues at the moment).
Few people have told me about a setup with linux, drbd and heartbeat
which offers them some level of HA. Has anyone tried anything similar on
FreeBSD?
mjb
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
