On 7 Apr 2010, at 8:05, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > Until we get to 'database' everything is HA and quite easy to build and > manage. Having a clustered database solution is expensive and beyond most > smallish budgets. mysql and postgresql don't have anything available that is > quite ready yet (IMO), so you'll need to be talking to the bigger (expensive) > players about their clustered offerings.
There are quite a few replication projects for postgres, aren't you writing them off a bit too easily? I know that for example the guys from Skype wrote and maintain one of them, I imagine they'd be quite concerned about HA. And there are a number more (see: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pooling). I suggest that you poll their mailing list with your problem/requirements if you didn't already. They're usually rather helpful and will certainly confirm if there's no solution to your situation (yet). Alban Hertroys -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest. !DSPAM:74,4bbc600010411126416115! _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"