On 7 Apr 2010, at 8:05, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:

> Until we get to 'database' everything is HA and quite easy to build and 
> manage. Having a clustered database solution is expensive and beyond most 
> smallish budgets. mysql and postgresql don't have anything available that is 
> quite ready yet (IMO), so you'll need to be talking to the bigger (expensive) 
> players about their clustered offerings.


There are quite a few replication projects for postgres, aren't you writing 
them off a bit too easily? I know that for example the guys from Skype wrote 
and maintain one of them, I imagine they'd be quite concerned about HA. And 
there are a number more (see: 
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pooling).

I suggest that you poll their mailing list with your problem/requirements if 
you didn't already. They're usually rather helpful and will certainly confirm 
if there's no solution to your situation (yet).

Alban Hertroys

--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.


!DSPAM:74,4bbc600010411126416115!


_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to