On 2013-01-17 15:26, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Willem Jan Withagen"
> To: "Julian Stecklina"
> Cc: "Steven Hartland" ; "Andriy Gapon"
> ;
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:11 PM
> Subject: Re:
- Original Message -
From: "Willem Jan Withagen"
To: "Julian Stecklina"
Cc: "Steven Hartland" ; "Andriy Gapon" ;
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Some new hardware with 9.1 does not reboot easily
On 2013-01-17 3:08, Ju
On 2013-01-17 3:08, Julian Stecklina wrote:
>
>
> Steven Hartland wrote:
>
>> - Original Message - From: "Andriy Gapon"
>>
>>
>>
>>> on 11/01/2013 21:38 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
On 2013-01-07 18:06, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> Has this been resolved? I still see
Op 17 jan. 2013 om 01:17 heeft "Steven Hartland" het
volgende geschreven:
> - Original Message - From: "Andriy Gapon"
>
>
>> on 11/01/2013 21:38 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> On 2013-01-07 18:06, Julian Stecklina wrote:
Has this been resolved? I still see a hang o
Steven Hartland wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Andriy Gapon"
>
>
>> on 11/01/2013 21:38 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> On 2013-01-07 18:06, Julian Stecklina wrote:
Has this been resolved? I still see a hang on reboot/shutdown on my
>box
(zfs root on USB th
- Original Message -
From: "Andriy Gapon"
on 11/01/2013 21:38 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
On 2013-01-07 18:06, Julian Stecklina wrote:
Has this been resolved? I still see a hang on reboot/shutdown on my box
(zfs root on USB thumb drive), but I am not sure if the problem
on 11/01/2013 21:38 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> On 2013-01-07 18:06, Julian Stecklina wrote:
>> Has this been resolved? I still see a hang on reboot/shutdown on my box
>> (zfs root on USB thumb drive), but I am not sure if the problem is
>> related.
>
> Could very well be be.
>
> I
Hello,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
>A reboot work around that works for me:
> reboot -n
> shutdown -n now
>Of which the manual pages say: option should not be used.
>But I have not yet found bad effects. Perhaps becuase I only have ZFS
>fs-systems
Thanks for the workaround! But as
On 2013-01-07 18:06, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> Thus spake Andriy Gapon :
>
>> on 29/11/2012 17:16 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> Would that mean that the regular checkout of stable/9 contains enough
>>> code to allow "painless" rebooting...
>>
>> Not yet...
>
> Has this been resolved
Thus spake Andriy Gapon :
> on 29/11/2012 17:16 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> Would that mean that the regular checkout of stable/9 contains enough
>> code to allow "painless" rebooting...
>
> Not yet...
Has this been resolved? I still see a hang on reboot/shutdown on my box
(zfs roo
on 29/11/2012 17:16 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> Would that mean that the regular checkout of stable/9 contains enough
> code to allow "painless" rebooting...
Not yet...
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
On 29 November 2012 10:16, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 2012-11-29 16:08, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 29/11/2012 10:53 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> On 2012-11-29 9:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200,
Andriy Gapon a écrit :
Hello,
>
On 2012-11-29 16:08, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/11/2012 10:53 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> On 2012-11-29 9:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>>> Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200,
>>> Andriy Gapon a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the followi
on 29/11/2012 10:53 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> On 2012-11-29 9:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>> Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200,
>> Andriy Gapon a écrit :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
As far I can see it fails because there i
On 2012-11-29 9:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200,
> Andriy Gapon a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>> on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
>>> As far I can see it fails because there is no getnewvnode_reserve()
>>> / get_newvnode_drop_reserve() in 9.1
Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200,
Andriy Gapon a écrit :
Hello,
> on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
> > As far I can see it fails because there is no getnewvnode_reserve()
> > / get_newvnode_drop_reserve() in 9.1.
>
> The patch is for stable/9.
Ok, thanks.
I've made
on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
> As far I can see it fails because there is no getnewvnode_reserve()
> / get_newvnode_drop_reserve() in 9.1.
The patch is for stable/9.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing l
Le Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:41:32 +0100,
Willem Jan Withagen a écrit :
Hello,
> >> I'm waiting for the system to come back up, and will put the svn
> >> diff on my webserver, unless it is oke to post a 1200 lines of
> >> diff??
> >
> > I think that a webserver option would be better.
> > Thanks a
On 23-11-2012 23:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/11/2012 00:09 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
With you latest patch I was able to:
reboot
shutdown -r now
shutdown -p now
So that seems to work just oke.
Good news. Thank you for working on this!
I'm waiting for the syste
on 24/11/2012 00:09 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> With you latest patch I was able to:
> reboot
> shutdown -r now
> shutdown -p now
> So that seems to work just oke.
Good news. Thank you for working on this!
> I'm waiting for the system to come back up, and will put the s
On 23-11-2012 15:31, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/11/2012 15:09 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
Le Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:41:54 +0200,
Andriy Gapon a écrit :
Hello,
I will definitely MFC it to stable/9, just not sure if I would be
able to do it before New Year. It definitely won't be in 9.
on 23/11/2012 18:25 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> On 2012-11-23 17:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 23/11/2012 18:12 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> I have applied the patch but at the moment it does not fix anything
>>> If I go reboot, it still hangs.
>>>
>>> CTL-ALT-DEL g
On 2012-11-23 17:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/11/2012 18:12 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> I have applied the patch but at the moment it does not fix anything
>> If I go reboot, it still hangs.
>>
>> CTL-ALT-DEL give the last burp from the console buffer.
>> And then the cycle go
on 23/11/2012 18:12 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> I have applied the patch but at the moment it does not fix anything
> If I go reboot, it still hangs.
>
> CTL-ALT-DEL give the last burp from the console buffer.
> And then the cycle goes again, with all the time outs.
>
> So there
On 2012-11-23 15:31, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/11/2012 15:09 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
>> Le Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:41:54 +0200,
>> Andriy Gapon a écrit :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
I will definitely MFC it to stable/9, just not sure if I would be
able to do it before New Year. It defi
on 23/11/2012 17:25 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
> I've applied your previous patch (#3, I think) to 9.1 with
> few modifications but a quick test doing a "poudriere bulk" (lot of
> ZFS mount/rollback) shows that the system quickly becomes instable. I
> didn't find the time to dig into th
Le Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:31:06 +0200,
Andriy Gapon a écrit :
Hello,
> >>> I will definitely MFC it to stable/9, just not sure if I would be
> >>> able to do it before New Year. It definitely won't be in 9.1.
> >>> I'll send you a patch later.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The patch:
> >> http://people.freebsd.
on 23/11/2012 15:09 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
> Le Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:41:54 +0200,
> Andriy Gapon a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>>> I will definitely MFC it to stable/9, just not sure if I would be
>>> able to do it before New Year. It definitely won't be in 9.1.
>>> I'll send you a patc
Le Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:41:54 +0200,
Andriy Gapon a écrit :
Hello,
> > I will definitely MFC it to stable/9, just not sure if I would be
> > able to do it before New Year. It definitely won't be in 9.1.
> > I'll send you a patch later.
> >
>
> The patch:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfs-vf
on 21/11/2012 20:11 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 21/11/2012 20:08 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> On 2012-11-21 19:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> on 21/11/2012 19:48 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> [snip]
It seems to to be waiting/working in the ZFS code to get thing
on 21/11/2012 20:15 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> On 2012-11-21 19:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 21/11/2012 20:08 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> On 2012-11-21 19:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 21/11/2012 19:48 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> [snip]
> It seem
On 2012-11-21 19:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 20:08 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> On 2012-11-21 19:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> on 21/11/2012 19:48 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> [snip]
It seems to to be waiting/working in the ZFS code to get things unmounted.
on 21/11/2012 20:08 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> On 2012-11-21 19:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 21/11/2012 19:48 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
[snip]
>>> It seems to to be waiting/working in the ZFS code to get things unmounted.
>>
>> Yeah, oops, this is a known ZFS deadlock
On 2012-11-21 19:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 19:48 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> On 2012-11-21 18:27, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>> On 2012-11-21 18:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 21/11/2012 19:09 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 21/11/2012 19:06 Willem Jan Witha
On 2012-11-21 18:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 19:09 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 21/11/2012 19:06 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> Nothing that stands out for me, but then I'm not into FreeBSD kernels.
>>> But there is certainly no more userspace processes running ot
on 21/11/2012 19:09 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 21/11/2012 19:06 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> Nothing that stands out for me, but then I'm not into FreeBSD kernels.
>> But there is certainly no more userspace processes running other than
>> reboot.
>>
>> Certainly no pos
on 21/11/2012 19:06 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> Nothing that stands out for me, but then I'm not into FreeBSD kernels.
> But there is certainly no more userspace processes running other than
> reboot.
>
> Certainly no postfix, that could complain about missing libpcre.so.1
> That
On 2012-11-21 16:10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 11:55 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> Hoi,
>>
>> I'm building some new hardware for a customer, and given that 9.1 is
>> about to be around the corner, I installed 9.1-stable.
>>
>> svn from last night
>>
>> Trouble is that a r
On 2012-11-21 16:10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 11:55 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> Hoi,
>>
>> I'm building some new hardware for a customer, and given that 9.1 is
>> about to be around the corner, I installed 9.1-stable.
>>
>> svn from last night
>>
>> Trouble is that a r
on 21/11/2012 11:55 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> Hoi,
>
> I'm building some new hardware for a customer, and given that 9.1 is
> about to be around the corner, I installed 9.1-stable.
>
> svn from last night
>
> Trouble is that a reboot takes for ever...
> Same with shutdown -r
Hoi,
I'm building some new hardware for a customer, and given that 9.1 is
about to be around the corner, I installed 9.1-stable.
svn from last night
Trouble is that a reboot takes for ever...
Same with shutdown -r now...
What happens is:
services get killed
we end with all b
41 matches
Mail list logo
