At 10:08 AM -0700 1999/10/14, Doug wrote:
> It is cabable of that, but managing this on the scale we're
> talking about with the FreeBSD lists is just not an easy task. This idea
> has been proposed often, and always rejected by the very people you claim
> to want to help.
I can't
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Jamie Norwood wrote:
> IIRC, Majordomo is capable of having 'post-ok' addresses, where you can
> do a sort of half-subscription where you can post from an address, but
> not get list mail there.
It is cabable of that, but managing this on the scale we're
talking abou
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
>
> Jamie Norwood wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 06:35:20PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > > [Hey, what about this "Roasting Newbies" subject? I have read all
> > > messages so far in this thread, and c
Thought for the day: From little Newbies do mighty Gurus grow.
Some positive stuff on the list for a change; about time. What I cannot
understand is why anyone is suprised that stable recieves _inappropriate_
mail. If you track stable you are _REQUIRED_ to subscribe to _THIS_
mailing list. (Yes
I think all of these are very good ideas. Set out plenty of pointers to
self-help and it makes dealing with people that want to learn much easier.
I love to say 'man it' or goto freebsd.org and follow the links to
'newbie' or something similar. It also makes sense to keep a few of the
lists clo
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 05:37:29AM -0500, Mike Pritchard wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 05:20:45PM -0400, Michael Lucas wrote:
> > IMHO, tensions on the FreeBSD lists are running at their greatest
> > level since... oh, I'd say mid-96, when I first subscribed to
> > -questions.
> >
> > If a "Fr
