On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 01:48:02PM +0200, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:15:04PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 14/09/2012 11:17 Lars Engels said the following:
> > > Here's are some more dmesgs:
> > >
> > > http://bsd-geek.de/FreeBSD/T61_dmesg.boot.9.works # PCBSD 9.1-RC1
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:15:04PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/09/2012 11:17 Lars Engels said the following:
> > Here's are some more dmesgs:
> >
> > http://bsd-geek.de/FreeBSD/T61_dmesg.boot.9.works # PCBSD 9.1-RC1
> > successuful boot on AC power
> > http://bsd-geek.de/FreeBSD/T61_dmes
on 14/09/2012 11:17 Lars Engels said the following:
> Here's are some more dmesgs:
>
> http://bsd-geek.de/FreeBSD/T61_dmesg.boot.9.works # PCBSD 9.1-RC1
> successuful boot on AC power
> http://bsd-geek.de/FreeBSD/T61_dmesg.boot.10.works # FreeBSD 10-CURRENT
> successful boot on battery
> http
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:58:11PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 13.09.2012 10:44, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:08:25PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> On 12.09.2012 22:58, Lars Engels wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:58:31PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
>
On 13.09.2012 10:44, Lars Engels wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:08:25PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 12.09.2012 22:58, Lars Engels wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:58:31PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 12.09.2012 20:46, Lars Engels wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:30:36PM +0300, A
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:08:25PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 12.09.2012 22:58, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:58:31PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> On 12.09.2012 20:46, Lars Engels wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:30:36PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on
On 12.09.2012 22:58, Lars Engels wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:58:31PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 12.09.2012 20:46, Lars Engels wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:30:36PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/09/2012 20:25 Lars Engels said the following:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:54:30PM
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:58:31PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 12.09.2012 20:46, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:30:36PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 12/09/2012 20:25 Lars Engels said the following:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
On 12.09.2012 20:46, Lars Engels wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:30:36PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/09/2012 20:25 Lars Engels said the following:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Could you try to play with different eventtimer settings (preferably in
curre
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:30:36PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 12/09/2012 20:25 Lars Engels said the following:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> Could you try to play with different eventtimer settings (preferably in
> >> current) ?
> >> You can use this t
on 12/09/2012 20:25 Lars Engels said the following:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Could you try to play with different eventtimer settings (preferably in
>> current) ?
>> You can use this thread / PR as a guide:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 12/09/2012 14:34 Lars Engels said the following:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:02:12PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> >>
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 22-08-2012 18:52, Lars Engels w
on 12/09/2012 15:54 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 12/09/2012 14:34 Lars Engels said the following:
>> Meanwhile I found out what's the cause of it. On 9.x it only hung from
>> time to time, but I tried a few weeks old CURRENT and it hung at every
>> boot at the same time.
>> With enabled ve
on 12/09/2012 14:34 Lars Engels said the following:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:02:12PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 22-08-2012 18:52, Lars Engels wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:47:09PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen w
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:02:12PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 22-08-2012 18:52, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:47:09PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> >>
> >> On 22-08-2012 11:33, Lars Engels wrote:
>
On Monday, August 27, 2012 4:07:26 pm Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> On 2012-08-27 19:54, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 26, 2012 6:59:22 pm Martin Dieringer wrote:
> >> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 08/26/12 18:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >
On 2012-08-27 19:54, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, August 26, 2012 6:59:22 pm Martin Dieringer wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
On 08/26/12 18:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
On our X61s's setting 'debug.acpi.disabled="hostres"' does not change
the inability to boot 9-BETA1
On Sunday, August 26, 2012 6:59:22 pm Martin Dieringer wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
> > On 08/26/12 18:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>> On our X61s's setting 'debug.acpi.disabled="hostres"' does not change
> >>> the inability to boot 9-BETA1, 9-RC1 or -curre
On Sunday, August 26, 2012 7:51:27 am Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> On our X61s's setting 'debug.acpi.disabled="hostres"' does not change
> the inability to boot 9-BETA1, 9-RC1 or -current.
>
> What does fix it however, is to change the Kingston SSD drive to a
> standard mechanical one. This is ve
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
On 08/26/12 18:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
On our X61s's setting 'debug.acpi.disabled="hostres"' does not change
the inability to boot 9-BETA1, 9-RC1 or -current.
I tested 9.1-RC1 on X61, and it worked without any troubles.
Yes, it does on th
On 08/26/12 18:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
On our X61s's setting 'debug.acpi.disabled="hostres"' does not change
the inability to boot 9-BETA1, 9-RC1 or -current.
I tested 9.1-RC1 on X61, and it worked without any troubles.
Yes, it does on this one too if I install a mechanical disk. The pr
Hi!
> On our X61s's setting 'debug.acpi.disabled="hostres"' does not change
> the inability to boot 9-BETA1, 9-RC1 or -current.
I tested 9.1-RC1 on X61, and it worked without any troubles.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
_
On 08/21/12 21:09, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:50:27 pm Martin Dieringer wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:11:33 am jb wrote:
Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
freezes, among the last lines with v
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Thomas Steen Rasmussen
wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 22-08-2012 18:52, Lars Engels wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:47:09PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22-08-2012 11:33, Lars Engels wrote:
I hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-08-2012 18:52, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:47:09PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
>>
>> On 22-08-2012 11:33, Lars Engels wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a T61 running 9.1-BETA1 (with PC-BSD). In most cases it is
>>> booting fine
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:47:09PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
>
> On 22-08-2012 11:33, Lars Engels wrote:
> >
> > I have a T61 running 9.1-BETA1 (with PC-BSD). In most cases it is
> > booting fine, but from time to time it hangs at boot time but the last
> > lines are uhub0: ... to uhub4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-08-2012 11:33, Lars Engels wrote:
>
> I have a T61 running 9.1-BETA1 (with PC-BSD). In most cases it is
> booting fine, but from time to time it hangs at boot time but the last
> lines are uhub0: ... to uhub4
> Is that the same or a different i
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:50:27PM +0200, Martin Dieringer wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:11:33 am jb wrote:
>
> > Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
> > freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:50:27 pm Martin Dieringer wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:11:33 am jb wrote:
>
> > Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
> > freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
> >
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:11:33 am jb wrote:
Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
acpi_acad0: On Line
acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
after this,
On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:11:33 am jb wrote:
> Per olof Ljungmark intersonic.se> writes:
>
> > ...
> > >> Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
> > >> freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
> > >>
> > >> acpi_acad0: On Line
> > >> acpi_acad0: acline init
Per olof Ljungmark intersonic.se> writes:
> ...
> >> Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
> >> freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
> >>
> >> acpi_acad0: On Line
> >> acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
> >>
> >> after this, dead.
> >>
On 2012-07-20 08:02, John Marshall wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, 11:14 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
acpi_acad0: On Line
acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
a
On 20/07/2012 16:02, John Marshall wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, 11:14 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>> Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
>> freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
>>
>> acpi_acad0: On Line
>> acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tr
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, 11:14 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
> freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
>
> acpi_acad0: On Line
> acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
>
> after this, dead.
>
> What is
On 07/19/12 20:22, jb wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark intersonic.se> writes:
Hi,
Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
acpi_acad0: On Line
acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
after this, dead.
What
Per olof Ljungmark intersonic.se> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process
> freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are
>
> acpi_acad0: On Line
> acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times
>
> after this, dead.
>
> What is supp
37 matches
Mail list logo