On Monday, August 27, 2012 4:07:26 pm Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > On 2012-08-27 19:54, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Sunday, August 26, 2012 6:59:22 pm Martin Dieringer wrote: > >> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > >> > >>> On 08/26/12 18:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >>>> Hi! > >>>> > >>>>> On our X61s's setting 'debug.acpi.disabled="hostres"' does not change > >>>>> the inability to boot 9-BETA1, 9-RC1 or -current. > >>>> > >>>> I tested 9.1-RC1 on X61, and it worked without any troubles. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Yes, it does on this one too if I install a mechanical disk. The problem > > is > >>> related to installing on a SSD drive, Kingston SSDNow SV200S37A/128G. > >>> > >>> This must be related to a change in the base system some time between > >>> 9.0-RELEASE and -BETA1 as 9.0 runs and installs fine. Perhaps someone > > could > >>> suggest anther SSD drive with equal capacity that works? > >> > >> > >> debug.acpi.disabled="hostres" fixed it for me on T61 and T410 > >> with normal HD and (older) SSD (OCZ Summit) > >> > >> FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #16: Tue Aug 21 > > > > Can you get a verbose dmesg both with and without the "hostres" setting? > > > > OK, will post tomorrow, a quick check with > "debug.acpi.disabled="hostres"" yields same output excluding the "ata0: > reset ..." lines.
I don't think the "hostres" bit is relevant to your case (where a different SSD fixed your issue). I think that is related to the ATA driver in some way. I am curious about Martin's case where he reports that "hostres" does make a difference however. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
