Hello!
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Andrew Reilly wrote:
How would I be able to tell? tunefs -p lists ACLs and MAC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dumpfs /|head -1
magic 11954 (UFS1)timeThu Oct 26 17:53:53 2006
Yes, this is for RELENG_4 compatibility.
multlabel and soft updates, but of those only sof
Andrew Reilly wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:14:53PM +1000, Tony Maher wrote:
>
>>dumpfs / | more
>>magic 19540119 (UFS2) timeThu Oct 26 14:29:14 2006
>
>
> Thanks for the tip. Same on this system, so I must have given
> it a proper clean install when I moved to 5.3.
>
> The dumpfs
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:14:53PM +1000, Tony Maher wrote:
> dumpfs / | more
> magic 19540119 (UFS2) timeThu Oct 26 14:29:14 2006
Thanks for the tip. Same on this system, so I must have given
it a proper clean install when I moved to 5.3.
The dumpfs output seems to say a lot of interestin
Andrew Reilly wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:05:30PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>>Andrew Reilly wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So: my two cents: it can work, but it's possible for it not to
>>>work, and care is required.
>>
>>That's always true, but worth a reminder nonetheless. :)
>>
>>
>>>[*] The product
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:05:30PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Andrew Reilly wrote:
>
> >So: my two cents: it can work, but it's possible for it not to
> >work, and care is required.
>
> That's always true, but worth a reminder nonetheless. :)
>
> >[*] The production server is using a software R
Andrew Reilly wrote:
So: my two cents: it can work, but it's possible for it not to
work, and care is required.
That's always true, but worth a reminder nonetheless. :)
[*] The production server is using a software RAID mirror on
a pair of SATA drives on a low-end Intel P4/ICH6 motherboard,
Andrew Reilly wrote:
> [*] The production server is using a software RAID mirror on
> a pair of SATA drives on a low-end Intel P4/ICH6 motherboard,
> using ar(4), configured by atacontrol. Fsck on 6.x can't find
> any superblocks on /usr, but 5.5 is fine.
It's a horrible hack, and you should def
On Oct 19, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I delete rc.d/* isdn/* bluetooth/* defaults/* gnats/* mtree/*
periodic/*
and security/* as well as most other stuff in /etc that I know I have
not modified and won't need for a single-user boot. But be VERY
careful
about this!
I do this t
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:56:58AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Randy Bush wrote:
> >do folk actually successfully upgrade
> >to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using the
> >instructions in UPDATING?
I've done that successfully on two single-user workstati
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Randy Bush wrote:
for the record, i followed the recipe in UPDATING and it worked.
randy
Another for the record ...
I upgraded my production box from 5.3 to 6.2BETA2 without incident as
well. I was surprised that all my services started properly on the first
boot (pos
for the record, i followed the recipe in UPDATING and it worked.
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Randy Bush wrote:
> do folk actually successfully upgrade
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41:24 GMT
> 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
>
> to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using the
> instruc
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Randy Bush wrote:
do folk actually successfully upgrade
# uname -a
FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41:24 GMT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using the instruc
LI Xin wrote:
> Randy Bush wrote:
>> do folk actually successfully upgrade
>>
>> # uname -a
>> FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41:24 GMT
>> 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
>>
>> to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using
> I delete rc.d/* isdn/* bluetooth/* defaults/* gnats/* mtree/* periodic/*
> and security/* as well as most other stuff in /etc that I know I have
> not modified and won't need for a single-user boot. But be VERY careful
> about this!
i regularly do that for /etc/rc.d for any update that is a mont
> Certainly. My definition of "*safely*" means having a full backup of
> the system to which I can go back to if the OS version upgrade
> doesn't work; if you don't have a good backup, well, you can probably
> update from 5 to 6 just fine, but I would not consider doing so to be
> complete
> From: Patrick Okui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:03:16 +0300
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thursday 19 October 2006 19:39, Randy Bush wrote:
> > do folk actually successfully upgrade
> >
> > # uname -a
> > FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41
Randy Bush wrote:
> do folk actually successfully upgrade
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41:24 GMT
> 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
>
> to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using the
> instructions in
On Thursday 19 October 2006 19:39, Randy Bush wrote:
> do folk actually successfully upgrade
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41:24 GMT
> 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
>
> to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production sy
> From: Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:39:18 -0500
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> do folk actually successfully upgrade
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41:24 GMT
> 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG
On Oct 19, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
do folk actually successfully upgrade
# uname -a
FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1
18:41:24 GMT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using th
21 matches
Mail list logo
