Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-29 Thread JoaoBR
On Friday 29 June 2007 16:37:34 Tobias Roth wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> -- snip bind question -- > >> > >> And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE? > > > > There is a tradition of answering basic SA questions on our lists, > > whether they are directly r

Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-29 Thread Tobias Roth
Doug Barton wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> -- snip bind question -- >> >> And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE? > > There is a tradition of answering basic SA questions on our lists, > whether they are directly relevant to the list topic or not. If things > get too far off base

Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-29 Thread Doug Barton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -- snip bind question -- > > And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE? There is a tradition of answering basic SA questions on our lists, whether they are directly relevant to the list topic or not. If things get too far off base, users are generally directed

Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-29 Thread David Adam
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:17:59 -0700 > Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Pick a "fake domain" for yourself (such as home.lan or something that > > won't be used on the Internet; a fake TLD is the way to go). > > FWIW, '.local' is preferre

Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-29 Thread freebsd . lists
-- snip bind question -- And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE? I don't want to be picky, but asking bind questions on bind-specific mailing lists and not somewhere else is helpful to everybody. After all, someone else might have the same problem as you, and he/she probably won't sear

Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-29 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:17:59 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pick a "fake domain" for yourself (such as home.lan or something that > won't be used on the Internet; a fake TLD is the way to go). FWIW, '.local' is preferred by many these days. Example: machine.mydomain.local HTH

Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-29 Thread Trond Endrestøl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:18+1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > > > /etc/master/intranet.rev > > > > > > > > $TTL3600 > > > > > > > > @ IN SOA localhost. root.localhost . ( > > > >

Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-29 Thread Mark Andrews
> Yes, dns-server itself seems to work very well. when I query some public > domains - google.com, yahoo.com -, the result is fine. > but when I put zone files to /etc/namedb/named.conf, the domain is not > resolved. What is your search path (resolv.conf)? Note dhclient.conf cont

Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:01:00PM -0700, Minseok Choi wrote: > Yes, dns-server itself seems to work very well. when I query some public > domains - google.com, yahoo.com -, the result is fine. > but when I put zone files to /etc/namedb/named.conf, the domain is not > resolved. > > One more t

Re: BIND Configuration

2007-06-28 Thread Minseok Choi
Yes, dns-server itself seems to work very well. when I query some public domains - google.com, yahoo.com -, the result is fine. but when I put zone files to /etc/namedb/named.conf, the domain is not resolved. One more thing, /etc/resolv.conf is changed whenever the server reboot because the serve

BIND Configuration

2007-06-28 Thread Minseok Choi
Hi, I am digging on how to make home server. The home server is for Wireless AP, file server, samba and LAMP. The current progress is almost done but I can't solve this problem so far. I have 3 PCs. One is home server and the others(A, B) are WinXP. I have to know A's IP to access A because WinXP