I did svn up just now in my /usr/src directory. I got this message.
Should I worry about this?
Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.freebsd.org:443':
- The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the
fingerprint to validate the certificate manually!
Certificate i
2 and the newly added ability to remove vdevs from a pool in 11.2.
I'm hoping someone else has a neat list of changes on hand and that
I don't have to read every commit (for there are many, some arcane).
- Stephen.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
Hi,
My name is Stephen Joseph, the Business Development Manager at one of the
leading email database providing companies.
Our area of expertise lies specifically in the major industrial lists like:
Agriculture, Business Services, Chambers of Commerce, Cities, Towns &
Municipali
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-s...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> s...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gary Palmer
> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 7:31 AM
> To: Kai Gallasch
> Cc: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; Royce Williams; freebsd-stable
> Subject: Re: LSI SAS2008 mps driver
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Mcconnell [mailto:stephen.mcconn...@avagotech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:45 PM
> To: 'Royce Williams'; 'Kai Gallasch'
> Cc: 'freebsd-s...@freebsd.org'; 'freebsd-stable'
> Subj
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-s...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> s...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Royce Williams
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:21 PM
> To: Kai Gallasch
> Cc: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable
> Subject: Re: LSI SAS2008 mps driver preferred fi
On 08/01/2013 10:31 AM, Chris H wrote:
> So, in the end; why did Perl have to be relocated? Is my only
> recourse at this point to
> # cd /
> # rm -rf .
When I get into this kind of bad situation, I usually do something
slightly less drastic:
# pkg_delete -a
# find -d /usr/local -type d -exec rmd
On 02/24/2013 05:43 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 13:24 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-al
On 02/24/2013 03:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-allocated
>>> buffers like file_buffer[6][] (196608 bytes) an
On 01/28/13 08:17, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
On CTM:
On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
- I'm wondering if there is a clean/reliable way to pull an index of the CTM
deltas? (This is still very far from the one-liner c[v]sup had become, it
would be great to chec
On 01/28/2013 07:34 AM, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
> On CTM,
>
> On Jan 27, 2013, at 10:54 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> On 01/27/2013 09:24 PM, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
>>> On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>>> On 2013-Jan-23 15:40:
needed) to install it via ports, the only reasonable way was to use
>>> pkg_add for that if you didn't want to pollute your system with
>>> otherwise unneeded software.
>>
>> There was also ctm(1). ctm is small, BSD-licensed and has been part
>> of FreeBSD f
On 01/11/2013 04:51 PM, Brian W. wrote:
> When I tried the first time, it only grabbed a few folders, a second try
> got me a conflict message. I then just whacked /usr/src and did the svn co
> again, successfully.
>
> Brian
And when you want to update, you can just type
svn up /usr/src
>
>
>
On 01/03/2013 07:20 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> So, why not wait until some more mirrors are available?
>
> One other problem people in 'developed' nations do not see exists. If -
> like me - you are located on a very remote location with a more or less
> random Internet connection, many servers
tion about docs disappearing from
cvs is because I maintain the CTM delivery system. I am in the process
of switching CTM from cvs to svn, and IM(NS)HO svn is much, much nicer
than cvs or cvsup. I am really looking forward to not having to deal
with cvs any more.
Give svn a try. My guess is that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/2012 11:58 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
> wrote:
>> (Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.)
>>
>
> -doc@ is a better choice.
Th
(Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.)
Last night I did a csup to retrieve the whole cvs repository. I noticed
that huge numbers of files in doc and www have been deleted. Is this
intentional, or is it the svn to cvs program not working properly? And
if it is the latter, a
eir early versions. They also offered gnome3, and it just
wasn't working. So I dare not go beyond Ubuntu 10.04, and I fear the
day 10.04 becomes EOL.
Having started with FreeBSD before Linux, I feel I understand FreeBSD a
lot better.
Stephen
__
On 04/28/2012 02:50 AM, Zenny wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
Hi:
I could not figure out how to restrict users or other users from certain
privileges to execute certain commands in FreeBSD/NanoBSD?
What I meant is I want to create a NanoBSD image in which there
ed by removing MegaRAID ID's from the
MPT driver.
Steve McConnell
-Original Message-
From: Desai, Kashyap
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 6:35 AM
To: Marius Strobl
Cc: sta...@freebsd.org; zvq...@di.vc; k...@freebsd.org; Andrew Pantyukhin;
McConnell, Stephen
Subject: RE: r232411 brea
rts, then why doesn't someone write the "rm" command to fork
copies of itself that work on different parts of large trees?
Stephen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stabl
and against all existing jails.
I think the warning in the man page
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/jail/jail.8?r1=221665&r2=224286
is a better way to go.
Stephen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
On 12/23/2011 10:56 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Also, the chroot issue has been public for some time along with sample
exploits. Same with BIND which was fixed some time ago. Judgment call,
and I think they made the right call at least from my perspective.
It is this chroot issue that bothers me.
On 12/23/2011 10:07 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hey up list,
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
After receiving the fifth security advisory in a few moments, you will
get a Christmas message from th
On 09/24/2011 03:08 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I see that a lot of RELENG_9 tags have been created in the last day or
so. So I thought I would get the sources in the following manner:
I downloaded the complete cvs repository using cvsup. Then I ran the
commands
env CVSROOT=/whereever
I see that a lot of RELENG_9 tags have been created in the last day or
so. So I thought I would get the sources in the following manner:
I downloaded the complete cvs repository using cvsup. Then I ran the
commands
env CVSROOT=/whereever-it-is/cvs cvs co -rRELENG_9 src
and nothing happened e
On 07/30/2011 11:37 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message<4e345767.5070...@earthlink.net>, Stephen Clark writes:
Hello List,
Didn't see this show up in the mailing list so I am resending.
Could someone enlighten me as to when FreeBSD 6.3 does UDP packet reassembly?
I am havin
Hello List,
Didn't see this show up in the mailing list so I am resending.
Could someone enlighten me as to when FreeBSD 6.3 does UDP packet reassembly?
I am having a problem where I am getting a fragmented udp packet (2 pieces)
everthing is
fine if I get the first frag first. but if the sec
Hello List,
Could someone enlighten me as to when FreeBSD 6.3 does UDP packet
reassembly?
I am having a problem where I am getting a fragmented udp packet (2
pieces) everthing is
fine if I get the first frag first. but if the second frag comes first
then both fragments get dropped.
I am us
y want. If they
want to go to movie web sites and view the latest trailers complete with
all the flashy add ons, then FreeBSD is not the way to go. Of course,
if your idea of a good desktop experience is as a software development
environment, or to write math papers in latex, or
Jason Hsu wrote:
I've been trying to switch from Linux to BSD for my everyday computing (email,
word processing, spreadsheets, etc.), but I couldn't get things to work
properly. I've been so spoiled by the quickness and user-friendliness of
antiX/Swift Linux and Puppy Linux for so long. I ha
On 03/26/2011 12:00 PM, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28:53PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
Hi.
If one has multiple entries in the SPD some representing more specific
network addresses not to be encrypted and sent over an
ipsec tunnel vs more general
Hi,
If one has multiple entries in the SPD some representing more specific
network addresses not to be encrypted and sent over an
ipsec tunnel vs more general networks that would be encrypted would this
work?
In other words say I have a x.x.0.0/16 that should encrypted but in that
x.x.0.0/16
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Possibly you could use the example from the find(1) man page:
find -L /usr/ports/packages -type l -exec rm -- {} +
Delete all broken symbolic links in /usr/ports/packages.
(Note that the "+" on the end is not a typo, see the man page)
Brilliant!
Since
nge it to
if stat -L $link | awk '{print $3}' | grep l > /dev/null;
then rm $link; fi
but it is a lot less elegant.
What is the proper accepted way to remove broken links?
Stephen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
David DEMELIER wrote:
Hello,
A friend has a DELL Inspiron 1525 with an ALPS GlidePoint touchpad. We
have added hw.psm.synaptics_support=1 in his /boot/loader.conf but it
still detected as a standard ps2 mouse.
Looking at sys/dev/atkbdc/psm.c :
461 { MOUSE_MODEL_GLIDEPOINT, /* AL
On 11/01/2010 01:42 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 1:30:35 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
On 11/01/2010 09:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 8:38:15 am Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 05:20 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On
On 11/01/2010 01:42 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 1:30:35 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
On 11/01/2010 09:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 8:38:15 am Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 05:20 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On
On 11/01/2010 09:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 8:38:15 am Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 05:20 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, October 29, 2010 4:20:24 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
rr232x: RocketRAID 232x controller driver v1.02 (Jan 16 2008 04
On 10/29/2010 05:20 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, October 29, 2010 4:20:24 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
rr232x: RocketRAID 232x controller driver v1.02 (Jan 16 2008 04:16:21)
hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Jan 16 2008 04:16:19)
big snip
lo0: bpf attached
On 10/29/2010 03:51 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 01:40 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:12:29PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am having a problem
On 10/29/2010 01:40 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:12:29PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel
On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel atom mb. When
it gets to where it should identify the drive it hangs.
Can you try 8.1-RELEASE or an 8.1-STABLE snapshot
Hello,
I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel atom mb. When it
gets to
where it should identify the drive it hangs.
If I boot with no acpi it does the same thing.
If I boot with safe mode it comes up and identifies the drive but then
starts spewing the following errors:
ipfw2 i
On 06/09/2010 08:28 AM, Reko Turja wrote:
One final comment - I still don't understand why FreeBSD "won't"
respond to pings
when it has an address like 169.254.1.1. I can ssh to the unit but it
won't
respond to pings. I tried setting up a linux box with an address like
169.254.1.2 and it "would"
On 06/08/2010 03:00 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 06/08/2010 02:49 PM, Peter C. Lai wrote:
On 2010-06-08 11:44:29AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 06/08/2010 02:05 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 01:45:59PM
On 06/08/2010 02:49 PM, Peter C. Lai wrote:
On 2010-06-08 11:44:29AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 06/08/2010 02:05 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 01:45:59PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Why does FreeBSD 6.3
On 06/08/2010 02:40 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 06/08/2010 02:21 PM, Guy Helmer wrote:
On Jun 8, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
Why does FreeBSD 6.3 eat 169.254.x.x addressed packet when
4.9 didn't?
On 06/08/2010 02:21 PM, Guy Helmer wrote:
On Jun 8, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
Why does FreeBSD 6.3 eat 169.254.x.x addressed packet when
4.9 didn't?
* 6.3 *
$ sudo ipfstat -nio
empty list for ipfilter(out)
empty list for ipfilter(in)
Z2984:~
$ ifconfig rl
On 06/08/2010 02:05 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 01:45:59PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Why does FreeBSD 6.3 eat 169.254.x.x addressed packet when
4.9 didn't?
The following output would help:
- ifconfig -a
- netstat -rn
- Contents of /etc/rc.conf
Also, be aware
Hi,
Why does FreeBSD 6.3 eat 169.254.x.x addressed packet when
4.9 didn't?
* 6.3 *
$ sudo ipfstat -nio
empty list for ipfilter(out)
empty list for ipfilter(in)
Z2984:~
$ ifconfig rl0
rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=8
inet 192.168.129.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.16
x27;s lost a segment
for some reason and is trying to trigger fast recovery early.
Stephen Hurd schrieb am 18.02.2010 17:18 (localtime):
...
one retransmit per five packets). Is this what you're seeing? If you
have a capture you could share covering a few seconds, I could take a
look and
Stephen Hurd wrote:
Some experimental results:
When rsyncing with windows, and FreeBSD is receiver, I see the same
ACK ever two segemnts, but speed is at 72MB/s.
When FreeBSD is sender and Windows is receiver, it looks more I
expected. There are about 20 data segments before a ACK is returned
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Some experimental results:
When rsyncing with windows, and FreeBSD is receiver, I see the same
ACK ever two segemnts, but speed is at 72MB/s.
When FreeBSD is sender and Windows is receiver, it looks more I
expected. There are about 20 data segments before a ACK is ret
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Some experimental results:
When rsyncing with windows, and FreeBSD is receiver, I see the same
ACK ever two segemnts, but speed is at 72MB/s.
When FreeBSD is sender and Windows is receiver, it looks more I
expected. There are about 20 data segments before a ACK is ret
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sun, February 7, 2010 01:02, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sun, February 7, 2010 00:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sat, February 6, 2010 23:44, Eric wrote:
On 2/5/2010 9:22 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sun, February 7, 2010 00:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sat, February 6, 2010 23:44, Eric wrote:
On 2/5/2010 9:22 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail,
I've installed a recent 8-stable with gnome installed. I needed samba
and
noticed I
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Sat, February 6, 2010 23:44, Eric wrote:
On 2/5/2010 9:22 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail,
I've installed a recent 8-stable with gnome installed. I needed samba
and
noticed I have samba4-devel installed. but I can't manage to make it a
simple file server as I need. so ho
FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
I. Background
BIND 9 is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols.
The named(8) daemon is an Internet Domain Name Server.
DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) provides data integrity, origin
authentication and authenticated denial of existence
read the emails, so why should it bother me?
Stephen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Ivan Voras wrote:
An interesting problem. I presume that in either case (gpart or
GEOM_BSD/MBR) the output of "gstripe status" is the same? Only the
interpretation of the partition tables is problematic?
Yes, but the output of gstripe list is different in the mode lines...
for GEOM_PART, the
I've upgraded from 7.2-RELEASE_p2 to 8.0-BETA4 and using GEOM_PART_*
with my sliced gstripe array causes the /dev/stripe/raid0a to disappear
and the reset of the /dev/stripe/raid0[a-z] file systems to be unmountable.
My gvinum array is still working fine and, after chasing the ad* slices,
they
Nate Lawson wrote:
Ian Smith wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 09/04/2009 23:24 Stephen Clark said the following:
> >> Is there a reason it doesn't send and event like Linux that can be acted
> >> upon by user space
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 09/04/2009 19:17 Stephen Clark said the following:
Hello,
I am trying to figure out what happens on a soft poweroff? Is there a
userspace script that gets called?
If everything works correctly, then acpi driver sends a signal to init which
causes a typical
Hello,
I am trying to figure out what happens on a soft poweroff? Is there a userspace
script that gets called?
Thanks,
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
Dan Allen wrote:
While this enabled the mouse (without HAL), it did nothing good about:
a. The bogus keyboard scans.
Everyone is talking about an xorg.conf
The new X.org 7.4 upgrade hit me too: no keyboard & no mouse! Bummer.
I found that if I simply added to /etc/rc.conf:
hald_enable="YE
Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Peter (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:53:11 +1100) *
| X11 is a critical component for anyone who is using FreeBSD as a
| desktop and having upgrades fail or come with significant POLA
| violations and regressions for significant numbers of people is not
| acceptable.
Ful
Dan Allen wrote:
Thanks to Robert for pointing out a few things to me.
I have run
portupgrade -rf libxcb
I normally run portupgrade -WrRpPa
This is what I ran and it totally hosed my system.
I had to revert back to an earlier version to be able to
bring X back up.
This should have compi
Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Bruce (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:06:45 +) *
| One theory is that somehow the mouse driver ioctls which are passed
| to ums, are somehow hosing USB, although why that would be, I don't
| understand. ums currently doesn't have driver instrumentation in that pa
n LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [redirected from -bugs@ to -sta...@]
>
> Stephen Sanders wrote:
> > I'm tracking what I believe to be a bug in 32 bit compat5x.
> >
> > The situation is as follows:
> >
> > 6.3 am
David Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:48:54AM +0100, Bartosz Stec wrote:
My backup script split filesystem dumps to files with size of 4,37 GB (4
588 544 kB). It's just an optimal size to fill out DVDs. At this moment
I have to burn them from windows via smb-link becuase I didn't manage
Bartosz Stec wrote:
Stephen Clark pisze:
Do any of the firewall products on FreeBSD provide support
for a natted ftp server sitting behind the FreeBSD FW.
Without having the ftp server advertise the external address
in its passive mode packet, in other words have the firewall
product look
Do any of the firewall products on FreeBSD provide support
for a natted ftp server sitting behind the FreeBSD FW.
Without having the ftp server advertise the external address
in its passive mode packet, in other words have the firewall
product look inside the packet and change the internal addres
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Robert Noland wrote:
Hi,
Also just using gre's without the
underlying ipsec tunnels seems to
work properly.
The reason for this to my knowledge is:
http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/freebsd2/sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c#rev1.4
or looking at rece
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Robert Noland wrote:
Hi,
Also just using gre's without the
underlying ipsec tunnels seems to
work properly.
The reason for this to my knowledge is:
http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/freebsd2/sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c#rev1.4
or looking at rece
Julian Elischer wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
10.0.129.1 FreeBSD workstation
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
10.0.128.1 Freebsd FW "A"
^
|
| gre / ipsec
|
v
192.168.3.1 FreeBSD FW "B"
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
192.168.3.86 linux workstation
Also just
Holger Kipp wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:31:24AM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Dear Stephen,
I don't want to be rude, but looking at your description I don't see
what's wrong with the behaviour, but it seems you don't understand what
'* * *' really means.
How
10.0.129.1 FreeBSD workstation
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
10.0.128.1 Freebsd FW "A"
^
|
| ipsec
|
v
192.168.2.1 Linux FW "B"
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
192.168.2.20 linux workstation
from 192.168.2.20 Linux<->ipsec<->FreeBSD
traceroute -I 10.0.129.1
traceroute to 10.0.129.1 (10
Stephen Clark wrote:
Robert Noland wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 07:48 -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
you will need to define the setup and question better.
thanks.. cleaning it up a bit more...
10.0.129.1 FreeBSD workstation
es or
rebuilding tables)
-- Jille
Stephen Clark wrote:
Why would du show 630k used by /tmp while df show 161M used
by /tmp?
# du -sh /tmp
630K/tmp
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 94M 41M 45M47%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B
Why would du show 630k used by /tmp while df show 161M used
by /tmp?
# du -sh /tmp
630K/tmp
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 94M 41M 45M47%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev
/dev/ad0s1e193M161M 17M
Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
Le Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:07:06 -0400,
Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Hello List,
We have 2 different platforms that we are trying to use the watchdog
timer and watchdogd program on. One is a Soekris 5501:
CPU: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by A
Hello List,
We have 2 different platforms that we are trying to use the watchdog timer and
watchdogd program on. One is a Soekris 5501:
CPU: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS (433.25-MHz 586-class CPU)
Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x5a2 Stepping = 2
Features=0x88a93d
AMD Feature
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Gary Palmer wrote:
Periodically logging "ps -auxw" output to a file would be useful, as
ideally you'd gradually see the list get longer and longer over time;
it's possible you have many zombie processes as a result of a parent
which is not reaping its
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:30:26AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak.
The problem manifests itself after one
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak. The
problem manifests itself after one of our remote systems has been up
around 100 days.
The symptom is that it appears no
Hello List,
I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak. The problem
manifests itself after one of our remote systems has been up around 100 days.
The symptom is that it appears no new processes can be spawned. If I try to
ssh to the unit, I can see the 3-way tcp handshak
D-7.x?
If so, should the man page of "sigaction(2)" be upgraded to say this?
Thanks, Stephen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 01:03:46PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:25:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 07:36:46AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am trying to get a crash dump but am unable to with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p2
Hello List,
I am trying to get a crash dump but am unable to with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p2
/etc/defaults/rc.conf
dumpdir="/var/crash"# Directory where crash dumps are to be stored
savecore_flags="" # Used if dumpdev is enabled above, and present.
Z2873# sysctl -a |grep physmem
hw.physme
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
Did you try using Alexander Motin's new snd_hda patches? They are available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/
Thanks. I hadn't tried them. But they didn't work. (I used the Sept 4
patch on CURRENT.)
I could provide more diagnostics if anyone wants t
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 11:32 -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
On 4 Sep 2008, at 10:29 AM, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
This is supported by the iwn(4) driver in CURRENT, and it should be
quite easy to port the driver to 7-STABLE. If you're interested in
reinstalling FreeBSD and testing a
Niki Denev wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile it on 6.2 and get
make: don't know how to make cryptodev_if.h. Stop
???
where is this file?
Thanks,
Steve
Have you applied the 6.2 patch included in the late
Niki Denev wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Patrick Lamaizière
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:41:35 +0200,
Patrick Lamaizière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Hello,
I'm trying to port the glxsb driver from OpenBSD to FreeBSD 7-STABLE
(via the NetBSD port).
" The glxsb d
Scott Long wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, I totally understand that FreeBSD wants people to upgrade from
6.2 to 6.3. But given that 6.3 is still experiencing bugs with things
that are working fine and stable in 6.2, this is a pretty hard case to
make.
Can you describe the bugs that are affect
Doug Barton wrote:
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
The Apache page:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.3/misc/perf-tuning.html
It mentions FIN_WAIT_2 not 1, so this might be a different/new problem.
IIRC it actually is the same problem, but in any case you're missing the
bit where 4.
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:47:59AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Mine is a nvidia 6300 mb with a dual core amd processor. I am causing the panic
while trying to develope a DD for a EVDO
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Mine is a nvidia 6300 mb with a dual core amd processor. I am causing the panic
while trying to develope a DD for a EVDO usb modem - so it is not a great
problem - I was just surprised it wasn't rebo
Clifton Royston wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 03:15:51PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Matthew X. Economou wrote:
Steve,
I recall having to set dumpdev in /etc/rc.conf before I could get
FreeBSD to reboot automatically after a panic. I have dumpdev=AUTO
set on all of my headless servers. If
Matthew X. Economou wrote:
Steve,
I recall having to set dumpdev in /etc/rc.conf before I could get
FreeBSD to reboot automatically after a panic. I have dumpdev=AUTO
set on all of my headless servers. If you are feeling especially
brave, you can also set fsck_y_enable=YES and background_fsck=
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
