12.0-RELEASE kernel hangs on Dell Precision 7920

2019-01-22 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Hi there, I've installed FreeBSD/amd64 12.0-RELEASE on this beefy Dell Precision 7920 Tower workstation, but it does not boot unless I disable "Memory Map IO above 4GB" option in BIOS (UEFI): the kernel hangs right after "ACPI APIC Table: " line. Interestingly, it also won't boot if I disable NUM

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-24 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:38:46AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > ... > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, smc, > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, and > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. Warner, I ha

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:43:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > As far as I know, none of the drivers listed could do 1Gbps. Right. My point was that original proposal put 10/100 drivers into one basket, which is IMHO not fair: 10Mbps cards are rarely seen and used, 100mbps are not, just like 1000

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 02:26:44PM +, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:44:11AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > OK I guess I can understand removing 10 (I personally haven't seen > > one in a very long time) but 100 are omnipresent and most of my NICs

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:05:16PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > FCP-01010 (https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md) > outlines a plan to deprecate most 10/100 Ethernet drivers in FreeBSD 12 Holy shit! OK I guess I can understand removing 10 (I personally haven't seen one in a very

Virtio network: poor network with KVM hypervisor (latest Proxmox)

2016-03-01 Thread Alexey Tarasov
oes anyone have any ideas how to get full network performance inside FreeBSD guests? -- Alexey Tarasov (\__/) (='.'=) E[: | | | | :]З (")_(") smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Clock not ticking during S3

2013-10-01 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:12:38PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > The system is sent to S3 at this point and woken 4 days later. > > This is how it comes up: > > 27 Sep 23:07:03 ntpd[3045]: no servers reachable > 27 Sep 23:19:54 ntpd[3045]: synchronized to 83.170.1.225, stratum 2 > 27 Sep 23:19:

Re: panic with if_iwi(4) upon "netif restart"

2013-09-29 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 06:51:56PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Tuesday 19 June 2012 07:28:11 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:28:50PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > > does "ps" in kgdb reveal multiple instances of wpa_supplicant running

Re: fusefs-kmod does not work on 8-STABLE?

2013-04-16 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:21:32PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2013-04-16 08:14, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >>-u __start_set_sysinit_set -u __start_set_sysuninit_set \ > >>-u __start_set_sysctl_set -u __start_set_modmetadata_set \ > >>-u __stop_set_sysinit_s

Re: fusefs-kmod does not work on 8-STABLE?

2013-04-15 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:41:36PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > I've found the culprit: the problem is in this command of the build: > > > > ld -Bshareable -d -warn-common -o hello.ko.debug hello.kld > &

Re: fusefs-kmod does not work on 8-STABLE?

2013-04-12 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:12:39PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Does anyone have a clue why new ld(1) plays so badly with our system > > toolchain on 8.x (at least)? > > Maybe because there is almost 10 years difference between those > implementations? :-) > > In any case, to figure out what

Re: fusefs-kmod does not work on 8-STABLE?

2013-04-12 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 05:17:46PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:27:10PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > I've got puzzled with the fact that fusefs-kmod apparently does not on > > recent 8-STABLE: it builds and loads, but I don't see norm

Re: fusefs-kmod does not work on 8-STABLE?

2013-04-12 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:27:10PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > I've got puzzled with the fact that fusefs-kmod apparently does not on > recent 8-STABLE: it builds and loads, but I don't see normal "fuse4bsd: > version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.19" like I do on 9-ST

fusefs-kmod does not work on 8-STABLE?

2013-04-09 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Hey all, I've got puzzled with the fact that fusefs-kmod apparently does not on recent 8-STABLE: it builds and loads, but I don't see normal "fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.19" like I do on 9-STABLE (installed on the same laptop with almost identical kernel config). The result is that /

Re: 9.1-Stable rc.conf ifconfig IPv6

2013-03-12 Thread alexey
Dear Bogdan. Try: ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.conf first. > It is not working even I put lo0 instead of alc0. > -Original Message- > From: Kurt Jaeger [mailto:p...@opsec.eu] > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 12:07 PM > To: Bogdan Turcanu > Subject: Re: 9.1-Stable rc.conf ifconfig IPv6 >

Re: kgdb + uart

2012-12-14 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:22:12PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Yeah, kgdb and target kernel must closely match each other. > I guess that the machine does not support amd64 mode? Which machine? :-) My laptop can do i386 only, as it has old Dothan CPU. Lenovo box (victim) is E5500, which I want

Re: kgdb + uart [Was: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot]

2012-12-14 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:40:23PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > uart(4): > 0x00080 use this port for remote kernel debugging Thanks, that did the magic. The problem, however, is that kgdb from i386 does not like amd64 kernel image, and I do not have any other amd64 box in the vicinity. Not sur

Re: panic in AcpiExSystemMemorySpaceHandler [Was: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot]

2012-12-14 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:48:10AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Could you please obtain acpidump output using Ubuntu? Yup, I already did [1]. Here is the what's inside: all.bin dump of all tables dsdt.bin dump of DSDT (original) dsdt.dsl decompiled DSDT dsdt.aml reco

Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot

2012-12-14 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:50:06AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > It looks like you obtained the boot messages using some sort of a remote > console? Yes; luckily this box has serial port (real, on-board one). > If yes, you can try to use kgdb for a live remote debugging. I thought of it, but last

Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot

2012-12-14 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:40:56AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:23:49PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > > If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the kernel symbols > > will do for you. > > It's OK, as long as they are provided,

Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot

2012-12-13 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:23:49PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:07:47PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > > They are included in the ISO. > > > > Meh... I did not pay attention to the subject too closely, it seems. > > If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the k

Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot

2012-12-13 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:36:35AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > > https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/ > > It is a few days behind though. I've tried 10.0 image from it; still getting (apparently the same) panic [1]. It seems that something is wrong with AML, but I cannot tell much without deb

Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot

2012-12-13 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:19:12PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Just a general note that nowadays booting without ACPI especially on > laptops would not get you very far in 99% cases. > IMO, it's pointless to try. I know, I just wanted to isolate a problem. > Will you be able to try head on this

9.1 memstick install panics on boot

2012-12-12 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Hey folks, Was going to try 9.1/amd64 on this Lenovo box with E5500 I have here at $work. Unfortunately it panics immediately upon boot [1]. Seems it be ACPI-related, as disabling it allows the boot to proceed a little further but still panic [2]. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS booted and worked just fine on

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-08-31 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:56:56AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:07:51AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Before zzz'ing: > > > > db> show intrcnt > > irq1: atkbd0168 > > irq9: acpi0 8300

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-08-27 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:34:54PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > If the USB HC is feeding too many such IRQ's it will be stuck. However, > if you see that "uhub_read_port_status()" is called, the kernel is at least > running, though it might be that some IRQ is stuck, hence the 100% CPU > usa

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-08-27 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:10:22AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2012 05:17:59 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:11:29AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > On Friday 02 March 2012 20:25:32 Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > &g

Re: panic with if_iwi(4) upon "netif restart"

2012-07-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:28:50PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Weird panic occurs to me here with iwi(4) based laptop when trying to hook > > up to WPA-protected network with "service netif restart". Kernel

Re: ServeRAID BR10il (LSISAS1064E)

2012-05-16 Thread Alexey V. Panfilov
16.05.2012 19:05, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: Alexey V. Panfilov wrote: P.S. my case is the same as http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=11222 And this is strange, on the machine where I have this one installed (as all other machines) I keep a MINIMAL kernel loading everything possible

Re: ServeRAID BR10il (LSISAS1064E)

2012-05-16 Thread Alexey V. Panfilov
16.05.2012 18:19, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: Alexey V. Panfilov wrote: I try to boot from CDROM with FreeBSD on IBM xServer x3250 M4 (P/N 2583-72G), but it always crash with message: "NMI ISA b8, EISA ff RAM parity error, likely hardware failure". This can be RAM error. I don&

ServeRAID BR10il (LSISAS1064E)

2012-05-16 Thread Alexey V. Panfilov
Hi! I try to boot from CDROM with FreeBSD on IBM xServer x3250 M4 (P/N 2583-72G), but it always crash with message: "NMI ISA b8, EISA ff RAM parity error, likely hardware failure". Attempts to install 8.3, 9.0, 7.3 / i386, amd64 - result always was the same. Screenshot of the crash is here: ht

Re: panic with if_iwi(4) upon "netif restart"

2012-05-08 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:28:50PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > does "ps" in kgdb reveal multiple instances of wpa_supplicant running? Yes, grepping /var/crash/core.txt.0 shows two wpa_supplicant processes, one in "-/Rs" state and another in "select/Ds". > If so, this seems to be the well kno

panic with if_iwi(4) upon "netif restart"

2012-05-06 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Folks, Weird panic occurs to me here with iwi(4) based laptop when trying to hook up to WPA-protected network with "service netif restart". Kernel and userland are not strictly in sync, with the latter lagging behind couple of months, but presumably this fact should not matter on stable branch.

Re: RELENG_8 kernel as of Apr 14 does not boot

2012-04-17 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:46:43PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > I've just tried to zzz/resume several times in a row with latest 8.x > kernel with io/mem compiled in. Maybe I am speaking too fast, but guess > what: keyboard works now, network service are accessible, bluetooth

Re: RELENG_8 kernel as of Apr 14 does not boot

2012-04-17 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 08:40:37AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > Hmm, this has been broken for a long time on HEAD and 9 it seems. However, > there you get compile breakage (as acpi is no longer supported as a module > in 9+) if you try to build a kernel with 'nodevice mem'. Yes, I am aware. Unfo

Re: RELENG_8 kernel as of Apr 14 does not boot

2012-04-17 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 08:08:40PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > I guess, Alexey just tries to make smallest possible kernel just for fun :-) You are correct. Not for the size reasons though, but I want to be able to change as much as possible on the fly, without a reboot, and I can

Re: RELENG_8 kernel as of Apr 14 does not boot

2012-04-16 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:37:29PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 16.04.2012 11:26, Alexey Dokuchaev пишет: > > Just update my 8.x kernel sources last weekend, and newly built kernel did > > not boot for me: > > > > link_elf: symbol mem_range_softc undefined >

RELENG_8 kernel as of Apr 14 does not boot

2012-04-15 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Hi, Just update my 8.x kernel sources last weekend, and newly built kernel did not boot for me: link_elf: symbol mem_range_softc undefined KLD file acpi.ko - could not finalize loading kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled This is stripped down kernel with everything possible loaded from modul

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-03-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:11:29AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 02 March 2012 20:25:32 Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > Try the attached patch. At least, it fixed my problem. > > I've committed your patch with some minor modifications. > > http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/232448 Unf

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-03-02 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:14:08PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 02 March 2012 09:57:03 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 08:48:13AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > If the reset doesn't work, then try to enable hw.usb.uhub.debug=15

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-03-02 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 08:48:13AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > If the reset doesn't work, then try to enable hw.usb.uhub.debug=15 and see > what port change events are coming. I don't see such oid hw.usb.uhub.debug. Perhaps it should be hw.usb.debug? > If cfg=255 in usbconfig, then somet

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-03-02 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:55:03PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Thursday 01 March 2012 01:53 pm, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > What is output from usbconfig as root, before and after > > suspend/resume ? Before suspend (just after reboot, this output is identical to pre/post SVN r229370): ugen

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-03-01 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22:38PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:28:15PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > I was mistaken, the latest kernel with working resume is from Jan 4 00:00 > > UTC, kernel from Jan 4 01:00 UTC does not allow my laptop to com

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-27 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:46:07PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > Can you please try head and/or stable/9? FYI, Linux people found that > some BIOSes can corrupt low 64KB between suspend/resume, which may > cause strangeness like this. I worked around it in head (r231781) > and stable/9 (r232088)

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-27 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:47:49AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > Yes, I can't think of how r229450 would affect "resume". All it does is > clear the high order bit in an error reply from an NFS server, since that > bit should never be set in an NFS error reply and, if set, it results in > an mbuf li

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-27 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:28:15PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > I was mistaken, the latest kernel with working resume is from Jan 4 00:00 > UTC, kernel from Jan 4 01:00 UTC does not allow my laptop to come back from > zzz(8) successfully. It seems that offending change is rev. 1

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-27 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:57:14AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Yesterday I've updated my laptop to the latest RELENG_8, it booted just > fine, however, after coming out of suspend, keyboard does not work (well, > almost: I can switch between consoles, Caps Lock works, but

Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-22 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Hi, Yesterday I've updated my laptop to the latest RELENG_8, it booted just fine, however, after coming out of suspend, keyboard does not work (well, almost: I can switch between consoles, Caps Lock works, but I cannot type anything, login, etc., break into debugger with Ctrl-Alt-Esc). Network do

Re: STABLE kernel panic: privileged instruction fault

2010-08-16 Thread Alexey Tarasov
On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:39 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:35:36PM +0400, Alexey Tarasov wrote: >> >> On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:31 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:21:15PM +0400, Alexey Tarasov wrote: >>>>

Re: STABLE kernel panic: privileged instruction fault

2010-08-16 Thread Alexey Tarasov
On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:31 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:21:15PM +0400, Alexey Tarasov wrote: >> Hello Kostik! >> >> On Aug 16, 2010, at 10:48 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> >>>> >>> The backtrace make ab

Re: STABLE kernel panic: privileged instruction fault

2010-08-16 Thread Alexey Tarasov
x) 0xff0060c0b771: add%al,(%rax) 0xff0060c0b773: add%al,(%rax) 0xff0060c0b775: add%al,(%rax) 0xff0060c0b777: add%al,0x290c55(%rax) 0xff0060c0b77d: (bad) 0xff0060c0b77e: (bad) 0xff0060c0b77f: incl (%rax) -- Alexey Taraso

STABLE kernel panic: privileged instruction fault

2010-08-16 Thread Alexey Tarasov
() #11 0x80b83c60 in sysent () #12 0xff8040d2cc80 in ?? () #13 0xff8040d2cae0 in ?? () #14 0x8059c431 in bintime (bt=0x80ad3140) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_tc.c:200 Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) (kgdb) -- Alexey Taraso

Kernel panic on 7.2-STABLE

2009-08-13 Thread Alexey Tarasov
or: blocks 176 files 26 WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted /var: mount pending error: blocks 44 files 11 em0: link state changed to UP I have vmcore in /var/crash folder. What debug information is needed to debug this problem? -- (\__/) (='.'=) E[: | | | | :]З (")_(") Ale

make buildkernel fails

2009-01-22 Thread Alexey Beketov
I trying to rebuild world and kernel on 7.1 My steps: 1) updated sources ok 2) make buildworld ok 3) make buildkernel fail here is an error I got: --- ===> umass (all) awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/kern/device_if.m -h awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.a

Re: kernel build broken on releng_6 due to camellia?

2007-12-10 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:02:14PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > hi there, > > my usual kernel config did not work with fresh releng_6: sorry, false alarm. my supfile was bogus. ./danfe ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

kernel build broken on releng_6 due to camellia?

2007-12-10 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
hi there, my usual kernel config did not work with fresh releng_6: ===> crypto (depend) @ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include ln -s /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VERSA/opt_param.h opt_param.h make: don't know how to make camellia.c. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. ***

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-12-04 Thread Alexey Popov
27;s the patch: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/038449.html Here's Kris saying that it helps: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/038672.html I'm not sure it will help to MySQL and Prostgres, but symptoms are mostly identical. W

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-12-03 Thread Alexey Popov
n work to do because FreeBSD with patched lockmgr on my workload is still 1.5 times slower that Linux. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-12-03 Thread Alexey Popov
Hi Alexey Popov wrote: Now we also have terribly performing PostgreSQL on 8-core server. We noticed the slowdown after moving PostgreSQL from 2xXeon 3.0 Apache+PostgreSQL server to dedicated PostgreSQL server. I collected some stats (see attach) before moving to Linux. FYI there's top o

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-12-03 Thread Alexey Popov
Hi Alexey Popov wrote: Now we also have terribly performing PostgreSQL on 8-core server. We noticed the slowdown after moving PostgreSQL from 2xXeon 3.0 Apache+PostgreSQL server to dedicated PostgreSQL server. I collected some stats (see attach) before moving to Linux. Sorry for the broken

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-12-03 Thread Alexey Popov
Linux. With best regards, Alexey Popov last pid: 58755; load averages: 26.42, 20.88, 14.00 up 25+22:12:42 11:51:11 84 processes: 29 running, 55 sleeping CPU states: % user, % nice, % system

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-12-02 Thread Alexey Vlasov
631 66%709 75%721 80%734 90% 19495 95% 25972 98% 25972 99% 25972 100% 25972 (longest request) Do you have any more ideas? I know that I can try to change to amd64, but I'm sure that this won't solve my problems. As far as I remember it didn't help Alexe

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-12-01 Thread Alexey Vlasov
_CPU_CFLAGS=false NO_CPU_COPTFLAGS=false NO_MODULES= -- BRGDS. Alexey Vlasov. last pid: 31039; load averages: 51.33, 26.31, 18.09 up 15+22:58:54 16:47:30 692 processes: 80 running, 608 sleeping, 2 stopped, 1 zombie, 1 lock CPU states: 2.4% user, 0.0% nice, 89.1% system, 1.6% interrupt, 6.9

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-30 Thread Alexey Popov
s not also need porting. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core

2007-11-29 Thread Alexey Popov
ximum size of this cache. See sysctl -a | grep dirhash and tune up vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem if vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem is near to the limit. Also could you please provide `top` and `systat -vm 1` output on dual- and quad-core systems during your tests? With best regards, Alexey

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-23 Thread Alexey Popov
t. They are in my p4 branch (kris-contention) but I don't have time right now to extract them. I think it would be very useful because I can't see any other ways to profile FreeBSD on the modern many-cores machines. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-23 Thread Alexey Popov
egister_init: MOD_LOAD (hwpmc, 0x804833e0, 0x809338a0) error 78 This is related to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=amd64%2F111994&cat= and it is impossible to use hwpmc with modern CPUs. Is kgmon profiling usable on FreeBSD 7?

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-11-23 Thread Alexey Popov
progress. Wow! Really disabling Patrol Reads solves the problem. Thank you! I have many amrd's and all of them appear to have Patrol Reads enabled by default. But the problem happenes only on three of them. Is this a hardware problem? With best r

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-22 Thread Alexey Popov
size there's no visible influence of your patch. However Linux is still 2 times faster for my workload and there should also be another ways for optimization. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-21 Thread Alexey Popov
scripts are started in parallel. On a 2x dual Opteron running amd64 I get: This problem is almost invisible for me on 4-core servers. Could you try your benchmark on server with 8 or more cores??? With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-21 Thread Alexey Popov
Hi all. Sorry, forgot to attach top & vmstat oputput on 8-core 7-stable with optimized PHP realpath_cache_size. With best regards, Alexey Popov last pid: 91239; load averages: 4.64, 4.72, 7.82 up 0+19:1

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-21 Thread Alexey Popov
;50 rps is still far away from FreeBSD. Linux makes that 2000+ lstat's without problem. There's still stat(), open(), gettimeofday(), close() syscalls for each include file in PHP that i can not switch off. And also it is unclear for me what to do with MySQL which happened to have the s

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-20 Thread Alexey Popov
else but CPU. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-20 Thread Alexey Popov
ement changes around 45% +/- 10%) seems too much. Thank you for your research. I think you can get more %sys with 4-core processors. For me 2xquad-core systems are now completely unusable as PHP backends. Anyway I'm happy that I'm not alone with this problem

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-20 Thread Alexey Popov
run them. Also I tried to halt CPUs by machdep.hlt_cpus sysctl, but in that case %sys in top was still much greater than %user. With best regards, Alexey Popov last pid: 1100; load averages: 8.55, 5.20, 2.35up 0+00:05:39 18:59:52 48 processes: 22 running, 26 sleep

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-20 Thread Alexey Popov
tain logical CPUs in the OS itself (see smp(4) man page) and see if there's a certain relationship between how many CPUs are running and what the sys load is. Thank you. I need some time to try all this. I'll report if find something. With best regards, Alexey Popov _

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-20 Thread Alexey Popov
d ULE 20 7-STABLE quad 4BSD 17 6-STABLE quad 14 6-STABLE dual 21 Linux CentOS 5 quad >50 With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-s

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-20 Thread Alexey Popov
system CPU usage will also be higher. Usually on PHP backends slow PHP code eats most of the CPU time. I have %user much bigger than %system in CPU states. But now %system is much bigger than %user and I can conclude that on 8-core server FreeBSD consumes more CPU time than PHP. With best regar

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-19 Thread Alexey Popov
good. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-19 Thread Alexey Popov
of/kdump.txt.gz Also, did you try configuring and running pecl-APC for PHP?'s I'm using eAccelerator. Again, the same soft works good on less-CPU system and on Linux. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-19 Thread Alexey Popov
~ 2 times less, but still there's 90% system CPU load (see attach). With best regards, Alexey Popov 1 usersLoad 16.36 12.24 6.14 Nov 19 18:08 Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-19 Thread Alexey Popov
5 0:36 24.27% httpd With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-19 Thread Alexey Popov
ULE" in the 7.0 kernel rather than "options SCHED_4BSD". I tried 7-BETA with SHED_4BSD and id did not help. Now I'll try SHED_ULE, thanks. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.f

Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD

2007-11-19 Thread Alexey Popov
Hi. Ivan Voras wrote: I have a large pool of web backends (Apache + mod_php5) with 2 x Xeon 3.2GHz processors and 2 x Xeon 5120 dual-core processors. The workload is mostly CPU-bound. I'm using 6-STABLE-amd64 and also tried 7-STABLE. If you haven't tried mod_fcgid, give it a try - it can drama

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-11-12 Thread Alexey Popov
030x 0x22ec ONLINE 0 040x 0x22ec ONLINE 0 050x 0x22ec ONLINE I tried to run with disabled Read-ahead, but it didn't help. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-s

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-11-11 Thread Alexey Popov
er time and they also didn't show anything interesting. All mutex graphs were smooth while disk load peaks. http://83.167.98.162/gprof/mtx-graph/mtxgifnew/ With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.f

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-11-09 Thread Alexey Popov
/gprof/intr-graph/ Also I have similiar statistics on mutex profiling and it shows there's no problem in mutexes. http://83.167.98.162/gprof/mtx-graph/mtxgifnew/ I have no idea what else to check. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-10-31 Thread Alexey Popov
em01463513610 1869 I tried disabling USB in kernel, this ussie was gone, but the main problem was left. Also I have this issue with interrupt aliasing on many servers without problems. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ fr

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-10-18 Thread Alexey Popov
e was no significant difference in CPU usage. I disagree about your words about recent version. I have this effect on many servers with latest FreeBSD-6-stable and em. Actually I have more servers with this effect than without it. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-10-17 Thread Alexey Popov
fortunately i've lost pmc profiling results. I'll try to collect it again later. See vmstats in attach (vmstat -z; netstat -m; vmstat -i; vmstat -w 1 | head -11;). Also you can see kgmon profiling results at: http://83.167.98.162/gprof/ With best regards, Alexey Popov ITEM

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-10-17 Thread Alexey Popov
lighttpd on other server to run in multiple workers. I'll see if it helps. What else can i try? With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubsc

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-10-16 Thread Alexey Popov
7 10:59:34 +0200 From: Andrzej Tobola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Alexey Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Exactly the same here but on big ata RAID0 with big trafic (~10GB/24h): amper% df -h /ftp/priv FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted one /dev/ar0a 744G679G4.7G99%

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-10-16 Thread Alexey Popov
lockf state. Apache is not much used here, it is just for kind of content management. It is not exposed to external users. With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

2007-10-15 Thread Alexey Popov
erver if needed. What else can I try to solve the problem??? With best regards, Alexey Popov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: call for ALTQ users

2007-07-28 Thread Alexey Karagodov
; > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:53:36 -0700 > "Kip Macy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 7/28/07, Alexey Karagodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > how can i help you? > > > > I'd like to understand how ALTQ is being used currently. Are t

Re: call for ALTQ users

2007-07-28 Thread Alexey Karagodov
how can i help you? 2007/7/29, Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Expanding the net a bit. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Jul 28, 2007 2:03 PM > Subject: call for ALTQ users > To: freebsd-net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I'm looking at extendin

Re: pmtud + ipnat RELENG_6_2 appears to be broken

2007-07-26 Thread Alexey Karagodov
YES. thank you! your latest patch solved my problems. going to test it tomorrow in production. 2007/7/26, Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:42:21PM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote: > patch did not help ... > > ifconfig: > > > lagg0: flags=884

Re: pmtud + ipnat RELENG_6_2 appears to be broken

2007-07-25 Thread Alexey Karagodov
(ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 > max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 > max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 > max 1510) 2007/7/25, Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:15:17AM

Re: pmtud + ipnat RELENG_6_2 appears to be broken

2007-07-24 Thread Alexey Karagodov
is there any progress? just one "me too" this problem appeared for me when i try to use vlan over lagg ( to em NICs ) thanx kernel: vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 > max 1510) 2007/7/13, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Jul 12, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Stephen

Re: Seems like pf skips some packets.

2007-07-15 Thread Alexey Sopov
Fresh news. I've noticed all unblocked packets have tcp window suggestion set to 0 (zero). I tried to block these packets on external interface: ~>sudo ipfw add 10 deny log tcp from 192.168.0.0/16 to any via external out tcpwin 0 This rule is the first rule in ipfw. Then I looked for such packe

  1   2   >