On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:47:49AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > Yes, I can't think of how r229450 would affect "resume". All it does is > clear the high order bit in an error reply from an NFS server, since that > bit should never be set in an NFS error reply and, if set, it results in > an mbuf list being free'd twice.
True, although even if it helps triggering the real underlying bug, it's still weird. > The bit is erroneously set by "amd" sometimes. If you are using "amd", > that might be related to the resume problem? No, I don't; I've deliberately disabled almost everything. > ps: I suspect you saw it, but there was a recent thread related to known > suspend/resume issues and discussed how they might be fixed in the > future. Sorry, I don't remember which list or the exact subject line. Yes, I know what are you talking about. However, I don't recall if any one was experiencing the same symptoms as I do. ./danfe _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
