th pinging the arcmsr driver maintainer about this.
- Rich
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:49:27PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
>> On 01/09/2011 10:00 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
>> > On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Mat
Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Dec 28, 2008, at 8:47, Rich Dunkle wrote:
FreeBSD 7.1 RC2
using: xf86-video-radeonhd-1.2.4 X.Org ati RadeonHD display driver
after running Xorg -configure
run: X -config /root/xorg.conf.new
exit with control- alt- backspace
This will lock the machine and require
FreeBSD 7.1 RC2
using: xf86-video-radeonhd-1.2.4 X.Org ati RadeonHD display driver
after running Xorg -configure
run: X -config /root/xorg.conf.new
exit with control- alt- backspace
This will lock the machine and require a reboot.
___
freebsd-stab
ple who are more familiar with the hardware and the code.
I've updated PR 103435 with this info.
Rich Wales
Palo Alto, CA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.richw.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
's causing it.
Needless to say, I'd love to see a fix. Any ideas?
Rich Wales
Palo Alto, CA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.richw.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
23:71:66
miibus0: on sk0
e1000phy0: on miibus0
e1000phy0: 1000baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX, 10baseTX-FDX, 10baseTX,
auto
Rich Wales[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.richw.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
it appears that the current EG1032's use a Marvell 88E8003
chip, which (AFAICT) isn't supported by any driver in 4.11.
Rich Wales[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.richw.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
full backup of the old drive in preparation for
copying the data onto the new drive.
Rich Wales[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.richw.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
h are MDNS (multicast DNS).
So, I was mistaken; my NIC doesn't have a "promiscuity" problem after
all. Sorry for raising a needless alarm.
Rich Wales[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.richw.org
___
freebsd-stable@free
imply impossible (and if so, why)? Thanks for any help.
Rich Wales[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.richw.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
What does this mean? Is it a reason for me to worry? Any ideas on
what might have caused it or what I should do about it?
Rich Wales[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.richw.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
When compiling php 5 recently here is what i had to do
i used the port in /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions it gives you
options for what kind of support you want (socket, ftp, etc) and it
also installs php. You will probably have to recompile apache as well
(I did) but it was the best way i cou
I have a user who wants to use passive-mode FTP to access files on my
FreeBSD 4.5 system. Our firewall is set up to allow all outgoing packets
and to allow incoming traffic on
20 TCP # FTP (data)
20 UDP # FTP "
21 TCP # FTP (control)
21 UDP # FTP "
Noneth
At 2:51 PM -0800 3/23/01, Kent Stewart wrote:
>I thought that was what is already built into 4-stable right now. I
>did a named -v and 8.2.3-REL pops up.
Sorry; I'm neglected to say that I'm running a (fairly vanilla)
FreeBSD 4.2 release:
% named -v
named 8.2.3-T6B Mon Nov 20 11:27:49 GMT
I just received a security notice about a really nasty worm that is
using a hole in bind to infect Linux boxes.
>Late last night, the SANS Institute (through its Global Incident
>Analysis Center) uncovered a dangerous new worm that appears to be
>spreading rapidly across the Internet. It scans t
At 10:45 AM -0800 3/20/01, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>Why are you using TCP? If you are on a reliable LAN, use UDP. TCP should
>be used for long haul NFS. There are lots of reasons for using UDP, if you
>want me to go into them, I will.
Although TCP imposes some overhead, it may provide better worst-c
At 7:46 PM +0100 3/18/01, Markus Holmberg wrote:
>Isn't there a small security advantage with building from source
>(compared to downloading packages from an untrusted party)?
Access to the source code (and even a close examination of it) isn't
enough. See Ken Thompson's Turing Award lecture, "R
ide down, with more space around it, and
added another fan, and (touch wood!) I haven't had any more errors from
this drive for about three months now.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsub
> I just upgraded to 4.3-BETA, and at boot got a warning about
> "/var/run/dev.db: No such file or directory" when I rebooted.
> It now exists, and is a berkeley db file.
>
> Could someone tell me what this file is, and what creates it?
The FreeBSD Browser (http://www.cfcl.com/Meta/md_fb.html) i
)? If so,
this seems buggy to me; my desktop really only wants to know about
=one= hardware address for the bridge (not two).
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
perfectly for me in all respects other
than ARP.
The "rl0" card in my bridge is identified as an "Accton MPX 5030/5038",
and I'm running it in 100baseTX full-duplex mode (connected to another
machine via a crossover cable).
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.w
ands on the other
machines to tell them the bridge's hardware address -- but I really
shouldn't have to do this.
Any ideas?
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
oblem to the XFree86 people. I also submitted
a FreeBSD PR (misc/23168), though this report got shot down on the
grounds that X isn't part of the FreeBSD base system. (I did post
a followup to my PR, with the above workaround, just in case anyone
else with the problem goes looking for help i
e kernel. For the moment, I think I'll have to stick with -RELEASE
and wait to track -STABLE until I have time to deal with a more involved
upgrade (including being able to back it out in case something doesn't
work -- the machine in question is a semi-production system and I can't
afford t
cable in
cases like this? For example, if an ATA controller has two devices,
and one is ATA-5 (or better?) but the other is not, then ata-dma.c
could say something like "can't do UDMA66 with fast/slow device mix".
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.co
non-RSAREF code on September 20? Or do we need to wait one more day?
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
According to Rich Winkel:
> According to Charles Owens:
> > Rich Winkel wrote:
> > > I just cvsupped fresh sources this weekend with the same result.
> > > Does anyone else use nfs to "installworld"?
> > > Or am I the only one having this problem?
According to Charles Owens:
> Rich Winkel wrote:
> > I just cvsupped fresh sources this weekend with the same result.
> > Does anyone else use nfs to "installworld"?
> > Or am I the only one having this problem?
>
> From 3.0R to at least 3.1-stable I&#
I just cvsupped fresh sources this weekend with the same result.
Does anyone else use nfs to "installworld"?
Or am I the only one having this problem?
According to Rich Winkel:
>
> This is from 3.2 sources cvsup'd today.
> The buildworld on the nfs server goes fine,
This is from 3.2 sources cvsup'd today.
The buildworld on the nfs server goes fine, the make.conf files are
identical on the server and client, but make installworld on the client gives:
[... lots of lines ...]
===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl
install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 perl /usr/bin
/usr/
30 matches
Mail list logo
